• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

RWC: England v Australia (QF 1)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
rwcenglandaustralia
706 Posts 68 Posters 42.9k Views
RWC: England v Australia (QF 1)
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #10

    @KiwiMurph said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

    @NTA said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

    This is fucking great!

    I can watch the Wallabies get knocked out, then relax as the rest of you shit your pants.

    Worryingly this is how it went down in 07.

    So Barnes to get our QF match? ๐Ÿ˜ง

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #11

    @Bovidae said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

    @KiwiMurph said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

    @NTA said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

    This is fucking great!

    I can watch the Wallabies get knocked out, then relax as the rest of you shit your pants.

    Worryingly this is how it went down in 07.

    So Barnes to get our QF match? ๐Ÿ˜ง

    I'd rather him than Garces or Poite. He knows he owes us a solid

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #12

    @nzzp said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

    @NTA said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

    I can watch the Wallabies get knocked out, then relax as the rest of you shit your pants.

    Underdog status claimed ๐Ÿ™‚

    actually, betfair agrees with you. Has strong favourites in Eng, NZ, SA and then slightly more even favouring Wales

    They have a hunch like @sparky and @MiketheSnow or are they using regression modelling?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #13

    I didn't think the Wallabies would beat England in 2015 either, and they flogged the fuck out of them.

    I reckon this will be tight as hell. If the Wallabies can stop Tuilagi galloping over the advantage line, they are a big hope.

    No QuarterN antipodeanA J 3 Replies Last reply
    4
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    Rembrandt
    wrote on last edited by
    #14

    My concern with Oz is who is their best 10? Doesn't seem clear to me.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #15

    @mariner4life said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

    I didn't think the Wallabies would beat England in 2015 either, and they flogged the fuck out of them.

    I reckon this will be tight as hell. If the Wallabies can stop Tuilagi galloping over the advantage line, they are a big hope.

    On the flipside England will need to stop Koroibete and Kerevi from galloping over the advantage line as well. If the Wallabies forwards can slog their guts out to get some parity those two can wreck havoc.

    mariner4lifeM J 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by mariner4life
    #16

    @No-Quarter said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

    @mariner4life said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

    I didn't think the Wallabies would beat England in 2015 either, and they flogged the fuck out of them.

    I reckon this will be tight as hell. If the Wallabies can stop Tuilagi galloping over the advantage line, they are a big hope.

    On the flipside England will need to stop Koroibete and Kerevi from galloping over the advantage line as well. If the Wallabies forwards can slog their guts out to get some parity those two can wreck havoc.

    absolutely. I think i would probably play O'Connor at 13 though, he is a calm head, and feeds the outsides well. Accurate tackler is another benefit.

    Edit: Whoops, i mixed up my Fijians and read Kuridrani.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #17

    @mariner4life said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

    I didn't think the Wallabies would beat England in 2015 either, and they flogged the fuck out of them.

    I reckon this will be tight as hell. If the Wallabies can stop Tuilagi galloping over the advantage line, they are a big hope.

    Tuilagi and Vunipola - if they're both fit and playing, the Wallabies will have a long day at the office.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to Rembrandt on last edited by
    #18

    @Rembrandt said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

    My concern with Oz is who is their best 10? Doesn't seem clear to me.

    Doesn't seem clear to anyone I'd say. Foley is out of form. Lealiifano doesn't appear to be able to make the step up. Toomua too often plays like the second five-eighth he is.

    That being said, I'd play White, Toomua, Kerevi and JOC

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #19

    @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

    @mariner4life said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

    I didn't think the Wallabies would beat England in 2015 either, and they flogged the fuck out of them.

    I reckon this will be tight as hell. If the Wallabies can stop Tuilagi galloping over the advantage line, they are a big hope.

    Tuilagi and Vunipola - if they're both fit and playing, the Wallabies will have a long day at the office.

    Yeah - in a game with no cards, I've got England winning by 10+.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by NTA
    #20

    @mariner4life said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

    Edit: Whoops, i mixed up my Fijians and read Kuridrani.

    Racist.

    1 Sio
    2 Latu
    3 Alalaatoa
    4 Rodda
    5 Arnold
    6 Pocock
    7 Hooper (c)
    8 Dempsey
    9 White
    10 Lilo
    11 Koroibete
    12 Kerevi
    13 JOC
    14 DHP
    15 Beale (if fit)

    16 Uelese
    17 Slipper
    18 Kepu
    19 Salakaia-Loto
    20 Naisarani
    21 Genia
    22 Toomua
    23 Petaia

    If Beale is NOT passed to play (ha ha), I would put DHP at FB, and AAC on the wing.

    Yeah that backrow is more about mobility than size, but bothing to lose, so fuck it.

    England are going to eat up our one-out running bullshit, and unless Cheika has a waterproof (airtight?) powder cabinet, we're out to the tune of 15 points.

    antipodeanA mariner4lifeM 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #21

    @NTA Where's Simmons in your list?

    Has there been a more maligned player to reach 100 tests?

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #22

    @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

    @NTA Where's Simmons in your list?

    Has there been a more maligned player to reach 100 tests?

    Let me answer your question with a question: is it deserved?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    wrote on last edited by
    #23

    Difference could be Farrells boot, lack of consistency at 10 and goal kicking could bite the convicts. To be fair I think the tight 5 is going very well with good props which is hard to say.

    It really just comes down to which Wallabies side turns up, Perth version wins, Eden Park version gets destroyed.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • O Offline
    O Offline
    Old Samurai Jack
    wrote on last edited by
    #24

    It would take a small miracle for Aussie to steal this one (pun intended) but having said that if there is one game they can get up for it's the Poms. Biggest concern is the tight 5 and their 12s lack of a distribution game (Farrell will just knock him over all day).

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to chimoaus on last edited by
    #25

    @chimoaus Farrell has been kicking crap this tourney

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • Stockcar86S Offline
    Stockcar86S Offline
    Stockcar86
    wrote on last edited by Stockcar86
    #26

    Cheika v Jones. Why can't both sides lose...

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #27

    @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

    @Rembrandt said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

    My concern with Oz is who is their best 10? Doesn't seem clear to me.

    Doesn't seem clear to anyone I'd say. Foley is out of form. Lealiifano doesn't appear to be able to make the step up. Toomua too often plays like the second five-eighth he is.

    That being said, I'd play White, Toomua, Kerevi and JOC

    Thatโ€™s their best line for sure.

    Does Hodge come straight back in?

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelb
    wrote on last edited by
    #28

    When does the banter between the coaches begin ?

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Stockcar86 on last edited by
    #29

    @Stockcar86 said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

    Cheika v Jones. Why can't both sides lose...

    One of those two actually seems like a decent bloke (and coach).

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

RWC: England v Australia (QF 1)
Rugby Matches
rwcenglandaustralia
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.