• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

RWC: South Africa v Italy (Pool B)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
rwcitalyspringboks
110 Posts 25 Posters 3.8k Views
RWC: South Africa v Italy (Pool B)
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • TeWaioT Offline
    TeWaioT Offline
    TeWaio
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by TeWaio
    #68

    @MiketheSnow said in RWC: South Africa v Italy (Pool 😎:

    Both should have gone

    Agreed! If anything, 17 looked the more guilty party than 1.

    Also, no idea why Wayno had to consult the others refs, it happened right in front of him after the whistle at a range of about 2m. And even then he only got half the decision right.

    Rugby reffing is an absolute clown show, embarrassing.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to TeWaio on last edited by
    #69

    @TeWaio said in RWC: South Africa v Italy (Pool 😎:

    @MiketheSnow said in RWC: South Africa v Italy (Pool 😎:

    Both should have gone

    17 looks the more guilty party than 1. No idea why Wayno had to consult the others refs, it happened right in front of him after the whistle at a range of about 2m. Then he only got half the decision right. Clown.

    Huh? Wouldn't you wanna check you're getting it right with something like that? I know I would. Sometimes others or the camera see something different...

    TeWaioT 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    wrote on last edited by
    #70

    How did Kolbe get away with that?

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    wrote on last edited by
    #71

    Fuck my days SA

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MajorRageM Away
    MajorRageM Away
    MajorRage
    wrote on last edited by
    #72

    Yeah, no problems with Barnes checking before redding.

    Still no idea how both didn't go.

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by
    #73

    @MajorRage said in RWC: South Africa v Italy (Pool 😎:

    Yeah, no problems with Barnes checking before redding.

    Still no idea how both didn't go.

    Yeah totally agree on both counts

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #74

    I think both Andrea Lovotti and Nicola Quaglio will get an appointment with the Judicial Committee.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #75

    Both props should have seen red.

    Both will get hefty bans.

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #76

    SA may be well ahead and win this game, but I can't say they've been convincing. It's just too messy.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #77

    @Stargazer said in RWC: South Africa v Italy (Pool 😎:

    SA may be well ahead and win this game, but I can't say they've been convincing. It's just too messy.

    Not exactly unlocking the defence. Kicking with good effect.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #78

    @NTA said in RWC: South Africa v Italy (Pool 😎:

    Both props should have seen red.

    Both will get hefty bans.

    .

    At least mid-range entry point of 10 weeks; if the usual deductions apply, they'll get a ban of 5 games.

    ee35e810-7fb5-413e-bccf-7bc2d2920d57-image.png

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #79

    @MiketheSnow said in RWC: South Africa v Italy (Pool 😎:

    How did Kolbe get away with that?

    The high tackle?

    MiketheSnowM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #80

    South Africa aren't unlocking the defence because their centres can't actually link or pass very well, only run hard at the line.

    Kolbe ankle issues

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #81

    @NTA said in RWC: South Africa v Italy (Pool 😎:

    @MiketheSnow said in RWC: South Africa v Italy (Pool 😎:

    How did Kolbe get away with that?

    The high tackle?

    Yep. That put the Italian in to touch

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #82

    Half ton opportunity goes begging with 3 missed kicks.

    Italy will need to send for more props. They'll be missing 3 come the All Blacks game.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #83

    That's it. I've seen better games.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #84

    @MiketheSnow said in RWC: South Africa v Italy (Pool 😎:

    @NTA said in RWC: South Africa v Italy (Pool 😎:

    @MiketheSnow said in RWC: South Africa v Italy (Pool 😎:

    How did Kolbe get away with that?

    The high tackle?

    Yep. That put the Italian in to touch

    I know the one.

    Apply the Piers Francis rule. 🙄

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • TeWaioT Offline
    TeWaioT Offline
    TeWaio
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #85

    @Bones said in RWC: South Africa v Italy (Pool 😎:

    @TeWaio said in RWC: South Africa v Italy (Pool 😎:

    @MiketheSnow said in RWC: South Africa v Italy (Pool 😎:

    Both should have gone

    17 looks the more guilty party than 1. No idea why Wayno had to consult the others refs, it happened right in front of him after the whistle at a range of about 2m. Then he only got half the decision right. Clown.

    Huh? Wouldn't you wanna check you're getting it right with something like that? I know I would. Sometimes others or the camera see something different...

    Yeah, I guess. But then he still made a hash of it, with zero sanction to #17.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TeWaioT Offline
    TeWaioT Offline
    TeWaio
    wrote on last edited by
    #86

    Maggie Alphonsi is an excellent pundit

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Billy WebbB Offline
    Billy WebbB Offline
    Billy Webb
    wrote on last edited by
    #87

    Happy with that.
    Hardly champagne rugby but the Boks did what they needed to do. And convincingly.
    Pity about the uncontested scrums.

    SmutsS 1 Reply Last reply
    0

RWC: South Africa v Italy (Pool B)
Rugby Matches
rwcitalyspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.