Tasman vs North Harbour
-
@Stargazer said in Ta$man vs North Harbour:
@African-Monkey I've been closely looking at the passing of some of the Ta$man players, particularly Christie. A lot of the passes go too high, making it very difficult for the receiver not to run too high. It has been one of the problems of Ta$man in this game. Set piece being another.
@Stargazer said in Ta$man vs North Harbour:
@African-Monkey I've been closely looking at the passing of some of the Ta$man players, particularly Christie. A lot of the passes go too high, making it very difficult for the receiver not to run too high. It has been one of the problems of Ta$man in this game. Set piece being another.
Totally agree Christie has always been a poor distributor and decision maker.
Not a SR HB -
Congratulations to Ta$man showing that despite they have several key players..They get the job done..
Well played Harbour in terms of defence , but Ta$man dominated field position and territory in the 2nd half..
Really enjoyable contest , and well officiated ..! -
@Stargazer He's always run very upright though, whether the service today has been poor for him or not, rugby league style. As @Steven-Harris said, he'll always give 100%, but it's not just today that he's been caught running high.
-
@Steven-Harris said in Ta$man vs North Harbour:
@Nepia one thing I respect about Taufua he gives 100% every time he takes the field..,not at his best body of work today..but still on the field and still going at 100%...
I was speaking in general terms not specifically about Taufua.
-
@Stargazer I thought Christie was not great today, a credit to Harbour putting on heaps of pressure at Breakdown.
-
@Steven-Harris said in Ta$man vs North Harbour:
@Nepia all good...I got a precious on that one..Got plenty of time for Taufua..he plays well above his physical stature ..
I’m not a huge fan, think he’s slightly overrated and always though he should have converted to 7 ... but that’s just my opinion, I know he’s got his fans out there.
-
Well, the first half was shit. Big Karl showing he's ready for a trip to Japan if necessary - and the Mako showing they need some of their first string front row firepower back.
Second half was a lot better, but attack still looked laboured and set piece a bit dysfunctional. Dare I say it, that we missed Mitch Hunt quite badly. I would have given Leicester some DM points.
In the end, I think better fitness and better bench depth got it over the line for Ta$man.
Freddie doesn't have much to say about this one.
"The show must go on"!
-
@Steven-Harris said in Ta$man vs North Harbour:
@Stargazer I thought Christie was not great today, a credit to Harbour putting on heaps of pressure at Breakdown.
Yeah - though he wasn't helped by the Mako forwards standing there looking at the ruck and waiting for NH to lock onto the ball.
First half - done in the scrums, done at the breakdown, and a lineout shambles.
-
@KiwiMurph said in Ta$man vs North Harbour:
So the Harbour guy gets binned for a penalty try but Ta$man don't get a player carded when they concede a penalty try.
Even though Ta$man is my team - in principle I don't really mind that.
If you're getting done over at the scrum, you don't really have a choice about standing up/collapsing/folding in. You're not necessarily cheating intentionally - you're just getting dominated.
In fact, the rules surrounding it are a bit dodgy - because often you have a scrum that's getting dominated - you send a prop to the bin and then require a weak scrum to front up with seven men, which seems bloody dangerous to me.