• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Aura watch

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
592 Posts 67 Posters 41.5k Views
Aura watch
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Billy WebbB Offline
    Billy WebbB Offline
    Billy Webb
    replied to rotated on last edited by Billy Webb
    #145

    @rotated said in Aura watch:

    Even more challenging for Ireland would mentally need to back up from beating NZ/SA before a prospective SF.

    Is that the likely QF for the team coming 2nd in the SA & NZ pool?
    Clearly this Saffa hasn't applied his mind much beyond the pool games...

    Fok. That's a tough one already at QF stage but as I mentioned elsewhere, this RWC has more genuine contenders than any I can recall.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Billy TellB Offline
    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy Tell
    replied to rotated on last edited by
    #146

    @rotated said in Aura watch:

    @No-Quarter said in Aura watch:

    I know they're a real threat but I can't take Wales completely seriously at the moment, they've still got a big mental hurdle to overcome.

    A lot will depend on how the tournament breaks in terms of QF/SF match ups.

    In the abstract I can see Wales/Ireland winning the RWC, but the reality of winning three weeks in a row with the mental swings that happen is another thing. Like we saw in 2011 with the ABs the relief/achievement of making the final finally can be mentally hard to back up from,and we have seen that in all sports thus the old 'you have to lose one to win one' adage.

    Even more challenging for Ireland would mentally need to back up from beating NZ/SA before a prospective SF.

    I think Ireland would just be happy to reach a semi-final for the first time, which would also involve having beaten one of the heavyweights. I doubt they have the wherewithal do rinse and repeat for a semi and a final, especially given their attritional gameplan.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to rotated on last edited by
    #147

    @rotated said in Aura watch:

    @No-Quarter said in Aura watch:

    I know they're a real threat but I can't take Wales completely seriously at the moment, they've still got a big mental hurdle to overcome.

    A lot will depend on how the tournament breaks in terms of QF/SF match ups.

    In the abstract I can see Wales/Ireland winning the RWC, but the reality of winning three weeks in a row with the mental swings that happen is another thing. Like we saw in 2011 with the ABs the relief/achievement of making the final finally can be mentally hard to back up from,and we have seen that in all sports thus the old 'you have to lose one to win one' adage.

    Even more challenging for Ireland would mentally need to back up from beating NZ/SA before a prospective SF.

    Oz need to beat Wales, England/France, NZ/Ireland/SA AND then win final!

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #148

    @pakman said in Aura watch:

    @rotated said in Aura watch:

    @No-Quarter said in Aura watch:

    I know they're a real threat but I can't take Wales completely seriously at the moment, they've still got a big mental hurdle to overcome.

    A lot will depend on how the tournament breaks in terms of QF/SF match ups.

    In the abstract I can see Wales/Ireland winning the RWC, but the reality of winning three weeks in a row with the mental swings that happen is another thing. Like we saw in 2011 with the ABs the relief/achievement of making the final finally can be mentally hard to back up from,and we have seen that in all sports thus the old 'you have to lose one to win one' adage.

    Even more challenging for Ireland would mentally need to back up from beating NZ/SA before a prospective SF.

    Oz need to beat Wales, England/France, NZ/Ireland/SA AND then win final!

    Ouch

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #149

    @booboo said in Aura watch:

    @pakman said in Aura watch:

    @rotated said in Aura watch:

    @No-Quarter said in Aura watch:

    I know they're a real threat but I can't take Wales completely seriously at the moment, they've still got a big mental hurdle to overcome.

    A lot will depend on how the tournament breaks in terms of QF/SF match ups.

    In the abstract I can see Wales/Ireland winning the RWC, but the reality of winning three weeks in a row with the mental swings that happen is another thing. Like we saw in 2011 with the ABs the relief/achievement of making the final finally can be mentally hard to back up from,and we have seen that in all sports thus the old 'you have to lose one to win one' adage.

    Even more challenging for Ireland would mentally need to back up from beating NZ/SA before a prospective SF.

    Oz need to beat Wales, England/France, NZ/Ireland/SA AND then win final!

    Ouch

    yeah ... IReland will get NZ/SA, Probably Australia (or whoever beats them), and then the final. Basically there's no easy route this time around. NZ might have the easiest QF if we get Scotland - but the other 5-6 teams that are really competitive will be playing off. Quarters wlil be a weekend of superb rugby ... may book the Monday off already ๐Ÿ™‚

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote on last edited by sparky
    #150

    Lard boy Peter Fitzsimmons on Stuff:

    "They (the All Blacks) have lost that aura of invincibility. "

    M N 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #151

    @sparky said in Aura watch:

    Lard boy Peter Fitzsimmons on Stuff:

    "They (the All Blacks) have lost that aura of invincibility. "

    Ex-lard boy

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • N Online
    N Online
    Nevorian
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #152

    @sparky note it took him pretty much a whole week to write anything following that shellacking - he must be hurting

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #153

    Peter Fitz is a good writer who spouts an enormous amounts of crap. And wears a headscarf.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • jeggaJ Offline
    jeggaJ Offline
    jegga
    wrote on last edited by
    #154

    Iโ€™ve heard that if you say Peter Fitzsimons name into a mirror he appears out of nowhere and bores you to death .

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by nzzp
    #155

    @mariner4life said in Aura watch:

    Peter Fitz is a good writer who spouts an enormous amounts of crap. And wears a headscarf.

    Perhaps the best description I have read of him ๐Ÿ™‚ He was kind of interesting for a while, but I don't bother reading much by him any more.

    Edit: a polite version of Stephen Jones? Or is that too harsh ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

    mariner4lifeM dogmeatD 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #156

    @nzzp said in Aura watch:

    @mariner4life said in Aura watch:

    Peter Fitz is a good writer who spouts an enormous amounts of crap. And wears a headscarf.

    Perhaps the best description I have read of him ๐Ÿ™‚ He was kind of interesting for a while, but I don't bother reading much by him any more.

    Edit: a polite version of Stephen Jones? Or is that too harsh ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

    his history books are actually really good. That's what i was meaning. I don't read his media stuff.

    jeggaJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • jeggaJ Offline
    jeggaJ Offline
    jegga
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by jegga
    #157

    @mariner4life said in Aura watch:

    @nzzp said in Aura watch:

    @mariner4life said in Aura watch:

    Peter Fitz is a good writer who spouts an enormous amounts of crap. And wears a headscarf.

    Perhaps the best description I have read of him ๐Ÿ™‚ He was kind of interesting for a while, but I don't bother reading much by him any more.

    Edit: a polite version of Stephen Jones? Or is that too harsh ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

    his history books are actually really good. That's what i was meaning. I don't read his media stuff.

    I find his books really wordy , I read the readers digest abridged version of Tobruk and it was really good without his usual bloviating .

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #158

    @nzzp Australia's answer to Jeremy Clarkson then

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRage
    wrote on last edited by
    #159

    I like him. Bit of a loudmouth but people in media rarely arenโ€™t.

    Generally like what heโ€™s got to say too. Reality is that AB aura is a thing, and the world is desperate for it to go.

    Comparisons to Jones are way off.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by
    #160

    @MajorRage said in Aura watch:

    I like him. Bit of a loudmouth but people in media rarely arenโ€™t.

    Generally like what heโ€™s got to say too. Reality is that AB aura is a thing, and the world is desperate for it to go.

    Comparisons to Jones are way off.

    His humour is generally self deprecating in a way Jones never is

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    wrote on last edited by
    #161

    Not really getting the negativity in this thread about Peter Fitzsimons.

    Stephen Jones comparison is well off, Fitz actually loves NZ rugby and will often talk it up when others are putting it down on Oz sports shows (rugby and non rugby).

    Jeremy Clarkson seems to a prick who goes out his way to be a prick, Fitz seems to be a good bloke.

    Haven't read his books and only read his columns when in cafes - so the wordiness never annoys me. Also, not sure what's up with the headscarf ... actually maybe the negativity is fair enough based on that alone! ๐Ÿ˜‰

    N 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • N Online
    N Online
    Nevorian
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #162

    @Nepia said in Aura watch:

    Not really getting the negativity in this thread about Peter Fitzsimons.

    Stephen Jones comparison is well off, Fitz actually loves NZ rugby and will often talk it up when others are putting it down on Oz sports shows (rugby and non rugby).

    Jeremy Clarkson seems to a prick who goes out his way to be a prick, Fitz seems to be a good bloke.

    Haven't read his books and only read his columns when in cafes - so the wordiness never annoys me. Also, not sure what's up with the headscarf ... actually maybe the negativity is fair enough based on that alone! ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Fitzsimons has a strong respect I think for NZ. And yes most of his books are a good read, as mentioned above Tobruk and the Mawson Antarctic story. Maybe if he is aware of the Aura he has been following the Fern?

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    wrote on last edited by
    #163

    I read a fair bit of Fitzy in weekend SMH and the odd book in the late nineties and early 00s. It was new and novel that an ex-rugby player (a tight forward of all people!) could actually put pen to paper in semi-coherent, slightly self deprecating manner, but perhaps it wore off over time?

    I can see the unflattering comparisons with Jones etc come from. Fitz wrote The Rugby War a seriously compelling, well researched, in depth account of the WRC and game going pro back in 1999. Yet despite being capable of some much more, he does use many of the same tropes as Jones - aura, sheep, the islands, infeririority complexes etc.

    The only differences is I'd happily have a beer with Fitzy, he just wouldn't have one with me.

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to rotated on last edited by
    #164

    @rotated Pretty sure that he would.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Aura watch
Sports Talk
allblacks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.