NPC - news, injuries etc
-
I like the single table structure but NOT the prospect of an uneven draw where everyone doesn't play everyone. That is the worst aspect of Super Rugby when it went to the conference system and why people turned off it.
The 'less strong' provinces in particular have ebbs and flows in their strength through the years and some will get a hard draw in the very year they peak. Vice versa an average team could get into finals due to a favourable draw in comparison to rivals. -
-
@gt12 said in Mitre 10 Cup - news, injuries etc:
Why not divide into two conferences with the top four teams from each going on to a finals series?
i like that much better than the current format where you play for points against a team in another competition entirely, that never made sense to me.
Reading Stargazer's post below, from my perspective, the entire competition is to see who plays (and in the main, loses to) Canterbury every year. The rest doesn't really mean all that much. When a losing record will get you a Div 2 semi final, is that really a good sporting competition?
-
@mariner4life Not sure what you mean with "losing record" here.
from my perspective, the entire competition is to see who plays (and in the main, loses to) Canterbury every year. The rest doesn't really mean all that much.
Then you just don't care about provincial rugby. To me, every game that my team plays matters.
-
@Stargazer said in Mitre 10 Cup - news, injuries etc:
@mariner4life Not sure what you mean with "losing record" here.
Theoretically you could make a semi by losing more games than you have won in a season.
-
@Hooroo said in Mitre 10 Cup - news, injuries etc:
@Stargazer said in Mitre 10 Cup - news, injuries etc:
@mariner4life Not sure what you mean with "losing record" here.
Theoretically you could make a semi by losing more games than you have won in a season.
nice edit Stargazer, check wiki did you?
And it's not theoretically, it happens every year. 4-6 will generally get you a Div 2 semi final. 3 years ago BOP made it with 3-7. What kind of shit sporting competition allows a team that won less than half the number of games it lost play post-season?
Don't tell me what i care about. I care about BOP games more than any other level of rugby. In fact the overly-regular BOP fuck up loss pisses me off more than any other sporting result.
However that's not what you were talking about, you were talking about engagement with a competition. When the same team plays the final every year, and wins 3 out of every 4, is that really a competition that captures the excitement? note i said competition, not individual games by the union you support.
-
@Hooroo Of last year's four Championship semi-finalists, that only applied to Northland.
But frankly, I don't care. If the comp consists of a higher and a lower division, cross-over games distort the points table.
I only like the cross-over games for the entertainment factor, if the games are reasonably close. If the lower division team gets absolutely butchered, that's just not fun anymore.
-
@mariner4life said in Mitre 10 Cup - news, injuries etc:
Don't tell me what i care about. I care about BOP games more than any other level of rugby. In fact the overly-regular BOP fuck up loss pisses me off more than any other sporting result.
Sorry, you seem to separate the competition as a whole from individual matches of your team. You only seem to care about the latter. I don't separate competition from individual games of my team, and that's why I watch each and every game (except the odd Southland game). Obviously, more emotion is attached to my team's games, but all the other games affect their position on the table and, therefore, matter to me as well.
However that's not what you were talking about, you were talking about engagement with a competition. When the same team plays the final every year, and wins 3 out of every 4, is that really a competition that captures the excitement? note i said competition, not individual games by the union you support.
The same team playing the final every year is only something happening in the Premiership Division; not in the Championship Division, which I was most concerned about. Also, what happens at the top of the Premiership Division is not going to change in the new structure. If Canterbury, or Auckland, or Wellington or Ta$man have dominated the Premiership Dvision (semi)finals the last few years, they're likely to do the same in a single table competition.
-
Just found the forum, loving these Provincial updates, player signings etc. Anyone know if Jordan Manihera is coming back for Mitre 10?
-
Some Northland news:
Renata Roberts-Te Nana (Old Boys-Marist, outside back) re-signed with Northland for 2019, Aorangi Stokes (Old Boys-Marist, loose forward) and Sam McNamara (Waipu, loose forward) re-signed through 2020
New signing, Harrison Levien (Old Boys-Marist, halfback) for 2019 season.
Scott Gregory (Hikurangi) recommitted to Northland through 2022!
-
@matty_kcrams Hi there, welcome to the Silver Fern Forum!
I keep a list of player/coach signings, re-signings, departures etc.. Obviously, it's not complete because not all signings are officially announced and contract durations are also not always published. Unfortunately, I have no information about Manihera still being under contract with Waikato, and am also not sure about his current whereabouts (whether he's still in the USA or not).
-
@Crucial said in Mitre 10 Cup - news, injuries etc:
I like the single table structure but NOT the prospect of an uneven draw where everyone doesn't play everyone. That is the worst aspect of Super Rugby when it went to the conference system and why people turned off it.
The 'less strong' provinces in particular have ebbs and flows in their strength through the years and some will get a hard draw in the very year they peak. Vice versa an average team could get into finals due to a favourable draw in comparison to rivals.I thought the 2 divisions was a great set up. Unsure why it has been changed. Although it is the NZRU so am not surprised
-
-
-
-
