• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
740 Posts 53 Posters 22.4k Views
Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by rotated
    #293

    @Chris-B said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    Rigor has still faced 1000 balls more than Tom.

    114 balls faced vs 86 balls faced per inning - the better part of five overs of shine more off that ball is a big deal. Both loaded up against the minnows and mid tier nations and didn't post big scores against the very best teams.

    The most outstanding aspect of Rig's batting is that he always showed mental fortitude and application during a period when for the rest of the team it often appeared optional.

    mimicM Chris B.C 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • mimicM Offline
    mimicM Offline
    mimic
    replied to rotated on last edited by
    #294

    @rotated said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @Chris-B said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    Rigor has still faced 1000 balls more than Tom.

    114 balls faced vs 86 balls faced per inning - the better part of five overs of shine more off that ball is a big deal. Both loaded up against the minnows and mid tier nations and didn't post big scores against the very best teams.

    The most outstanding aspect of Rig's batting is that he always showed mental fortitude and application during a period when for the rest of the team it often appeared optional.

    Rigor averaged 40+ against all nations except Australia (22.22) and South Africa (34.2). He was consistent.
    Latham averages 40+ only against Bangladesh (100.66), Sri Lanka (80), Zimbabwe (84.66) and West Indies (41). Latham looks more like a flat track bully.

    rotatedR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.
    replied to Godder on last edited by
    #295

    @Godder said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @Chris-B Probably not yet, but if he gets his average up, yes.

    Lead of 400 at lunch, must be due to declare.

    To be honest, I wouldn't set them less than 550 - and, because I'm conservative, I'd set them 600 in slightly more than two days - if we can.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.
    replied to rotated on last edited by
    #296

    @rotated Fair points.

    Interestingly, Tom is still more than two years younger than Rigor was when he made his test debut - so unless he falls apart it's probably going to be when rather than if he goes past Rigor.

    All going to plan, from here he should make more test hundreds than Crowe or Rossco.

    rotatedR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Do not disturb
    boobooB Do not disturb
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #297

    Yeah declare at drinks this evening if we can get there.

    It's a pretty good target already so a declaration would be a bonus.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    replied to mimic on last edited by
    #298

    @mimic said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    Rigor averaged 40+ against all nations except Australia (22.22) and South Africa (34.2). He was consistent.
    Latham averages 40+ only against Bangladesh (100.66), Sri Lanka (80), Zimbabwe (84.66) and West Indies (41). Latham looks more like a flat track bully.

    In both cases we are talking about small sample sizes - both lucky to get a home and away series against each nation. Hard to bag Latham's 31.40 average against Pakistan for 2 hundreds and 2 fifties in 15 innings. Same with England in 7 innings averaging 36.42 with 3 fifties. Neither stellar - but fine.

    Both show limitations against top tier attacks as those Rig stats show. His absolute peak was probably the England tour where he absolutely battled (in a good way) to a century against an attack that would a year later roll Australia.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by rotated
    #299

    @Chris-B said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    Tom is still more than two years younger than Rigor was when he made his test debut - so unless he falls apart it's probably going to be when rather than if he goes past Rigor.

    But does Latham have the test scalp of the best batsman in the world (at the time)?

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.
    replied to rotated on last edited by
    #300

    @rotated That's not a fair challenge - when they play on the same team!

    Let's hope there's no Indians reading this! 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • SynicBastS Offline
    SynicBastS Offline
    SynicBast
    wrote on last edited by
    #301

    what strikes me is that Latham bats time and balls - with the middle order he's got to protect, I'll take that everytime. I like that he can act as a fulcrum for others to bat around him. And Nicholls is really growing on me in terms of application and graft - something I'm not used to at #5 for NZ.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #302

    How good is this innings after the first innings?

    How good is it when the best two Batsmen get the lowest scores and those scores are still 40 and 48 ?

    I'm also loving Latham and Nicholls career stats at the moment too.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #303

    Hundy for Nicholls. Great work son.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SynicBastS Offline
    SynicBastS Offline
    SynicBast
    wrote on last edited by
    #304

    fuck.

    Well played tom latham. Application, concentration, fitness and dedication cannot be faulted. 214 run partnership and he ran bllody hard to make sure Nicholls got his hundy.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Do not disturb
    boobooB Do not disturb
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #305

    Poohs. Latham out. 176.

    Tea.

    Soooo ... 535 the lead.

    Declare now or give Col an hour (if he can make it that long) of ODI death batting? Make it a 6-hundy chase in 13 hours?

    Option A is roughly 2.5/over.

    I'm a fan of option B (approx 3.5 per over).

    But would take either.

    SynicBastS rotatedR 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • SynicBastS Offline
    SynicBastS Offline
    SynicBast
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #306

    @booboo said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    Poohs. Latham out. 176.

    Tea.

    Soooo ... 535 the lead.

    Declare now or give Col an hour (if he can make it that long) of ODI death batting? Make it a 6-hundy chase in 13 hours?

    Option A is roughly 2.5/over.

    I'm a fan of option B (approx 3.5 per over).

    But would take either.

    grind the fielding team into the dirt...lots of time, as long as we get 3 new balls

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #307

    @booboo said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    Declare now or give Col an hour (if he can make it that long) of ODI death batting?

    Or 20 minutes.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Godder
    wrote on last edited by
    #308

    Declare about 5:20 or 5:30, Southee and Boult get a full run at them tonight and again tomorrow.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    Virgil
    wrote on last edited by
    #309

    9/2 already
    Over by lunchtime tomorrow

    CyclopsC V 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    replied to Virgil on last edited by
    #310

    @Virgil said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    9/2 already
    Over by lunchtime tomorrow

    Optimistic! Might not even get to stumps the way Boult is bowling.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • SynicBastS Offline
    SynicBastS Offline
    SynicBast
    wrote on last edited by
    #311

    fc458ad4-91e8-429a-9d6b-07b3b45cabf1-image.png

    I'll take this for the 2018 calendar year thanks

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Cyclops on last edited by
    #312

    @Cyclops said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @Virgil said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    9/2 already
    Over by lunchtime tomorrow

    Optimistic! Might not even get to stumps the way Boult is bowling.

    Careful fellas. Similar bold predictions were thrown around last test before they dug in and saved it.

    Mind you two whole days looks a bridge way too far.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.