• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Cricket - NZ vs Pakistan

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
486 Posts 41 Posters 38.6k Views
Cricket - NZ vs Pakistan
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • PaekakboyzP Offline
    PaekakboyzP Offline
    Paekakboyz
    wrote on last edited by
    #400

    I like that Taylor was looking to be aggressive and hit his way into form. At least he has the ability for that to come off (some of the time at least). Showed that he was looking for other options rather than sitting back defensively which didn't work in earlier innings.

    KW, far out. I stayed up till nearly 2am to enjoy that masterclass. Well supported by Nicholls but I totally agree that he looks like he could get out at any moment, whether he's on zero or 99!! Definitely better when he's in a solid partnership and not having to create too much himself.

    Aside from keeping an eye on the performance of our openers, and batting options at 6/7 to support BJ, I think our approach should be 'lets bat with Kane'. I know we want everyone to be contributing to partnerships across the board, but if we can get 2-3 guys a match sticking with Kane then we are cooking with gas.

    Also really stoked with how Somerville has gone. Great to see him in the wickets and really interested in what he might offer on NZ pitches.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Paekakboyz on last edited by
    #401

    @paekakboyz said in Cricket - NZ vs Pakistan:

    I like that Taylor was looking to be aggressive and hit his way into form. At least he has the ability for that to come off (some of the time at least). Showed that he was looking for other options rather than sitting back defensively which didn't work in earlier innings.

    KW, far out. I stayed up till nearly 2am to enjoy that masterclass. Well supported by Nicholls but I totally agree that he looks like he could get out at any moment, whether he's on zero or 99!! Definitely better when he's in a solid partnership and not having to create too much himself.

    Aside from keeping an eye on the performance of our openers, and batting options at 6/7 to support BJ, I think our approach should be 'lets bat with Kane'. I know we want everyone to be contributing to partnerships across the board, but if we can get 2-3 guys a match sticking with Kane then we are cooking with gas.

    Also really stoked with how Somerville has gone. Great to see him in the wickets and really interested in what he might offer on NZ pitches.

    Two decent looking new spinners in a row for the BCs.....are we living in the twilight zone?

    PaekakboyzP 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • PaekakboyzP Offline
    PaekakboyzP Offline
    Paekakboyz
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #402

    @mn5 I know!! Weird to suddenly realise we have a bit of depth, even if only in 1-2 positions!!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Number 10N Offline
    Number 10N Offline
    Number 10
    wrote on last edited by
    #403

    Our man Kane ....

    http://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/25470155/frictionless-genius-kane-williamson

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPie
    wrote on last edited by
    #404

    No matter how dramatic (or predictable) the Kiwi batting collapse is, you're still genuinely surprised when Kane gets out. Everyone looked stunned when he got out in the 1st innings which is why he settled in for bed and breakfast in the 2nd. I probably care more about cricket stats than he does, but a not out and an average of 52 would be nice at the end of this series - and gives him a little gap ahead of Root. And as it says in that article above, in 4 of the last 5 calendar years he has averaged over 60.

    HoorooH 1 Reply Last reply
    8
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #405

    @chris-b said in Cricket - NZ vs Pakistan:

    @booboo said in Cricket - NZ vs Pakistan:

    @crucial said in Cricket - NZ vs Pakistan:

    @booboo said in Cricket - NZ vs Pakistan:

    We'd have to lose 6 for 30 to be under real threat I reckon.

    Someone had to say it didn't they?

    Better than 9 for 40..

    And even if we do now I reckon we're safe.

    Currently 199 to win at 2.2 rpo.

    Get Hank to his ton, add a few more and we'll be looing at defending 240-250 at 3s.

    It all depends on how willing they are to risk losing to win. In these days of T20, if Pakistan retain wickets then they can just unleash with 15 overs to go and it could be tough to stop them making a hundred runs in that period.

    If we're playing to win, I reckon bat for an hour tomorrow - the second half in T20 mode - if we can (Get the pads on Colin!).

    That should get us close to 270 and leave five hours to have a crack at bowling them out.

    Yeah that's fair

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    replied to KiwiPie on last edited by
    #406

    @kiwipie said in Cricket - NZ vs Pakistan:

    which is why he settled in for bed and breakfast in the 2nd.

    Easily my favourite Cricket analogy for the year

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    wrote on last edited by nzzp
    #407

    55 runs off 6 overs. We're going just fine this morning.

    reverse jinx AND ABOUT TO GET OUT

    edit: partnership 55 off 35. Good work πŸ™‚

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #408

    Southee should have come in before Watling for quick runs. That's not BJ's natural game.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #409

    @bovidae said in Cricket - NZ vs Pakistan:

    Southee should have come in before Watling for quick runs. That's not BJ's natural game.

    it sure has hell is Southee's! BIg 6 just hit. This is the time for him to play his natural game πŸ™‚

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #410

    Amazing that we got ourselves into a position to declare and go for the win. Awesome effort.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #411

    @no-quarter said in Cricket - NZ vs Pakistan:

    Amazing that we got ourselves into a position to declare and go for the win. Awesome effort BY KANE

    fixed that for ya

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #412

    I'm still surprised they declared so early. 280 in 79 overs is gettable but you do want to give Pakistan the carrot.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #413

    @nzzp said in Cricket - NZ vs Pakistan:

    @no-quarter said in Cricket - NZ vs Pakistan:

    Amazing that we got ourselves into a position to declare and go for the win. Awesome effort BY KANE

    fixed that for ya

    Bloody Little Kane - pulls out before Henry goes past him! πŸ™‚

    This morning worked out pretty well - apart from for BJ. I was really hoping they'd send Timmy and then Trent in instead of BJ - not much for him to gain just a drop in his average.

    Perfect declaration IMO. Very stiff but not quite impossible for Pakistan. Enough time for us if we bowl well.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #414

    Kane puts one down! Daaaammmnn

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #415

    @no-quarter Not a great morning for Kane, but now Timmy redeems him.

    One down,... nine to go!

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by Gunner
    #416

    Got eeeeem, nice Timmy.
    1 down, 9 to go.

    Edit: snap @Chris-B

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • PaekakboyzP Offline
    PaekakboyzP Offline
    Paekakboyz
    wrote on last edited by Paekakboyz
    #417

    First one down! Really hoping we can snare 2-3 early and give them the heebie jeebies asap

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #418

    Nice to see CdG and Southee do what we know they can do with the bat in that situation.

    Iman a danger man IMO. As a young player he won’t die wondering.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    Virgil
    wrote on last edited by
    #419

    CDG!!

    1 Reply Last reply
    2

Cricket - NZ vs Pakistan
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.