Law trials and changes
-
This part makes no sense whatsoever: The "referee, who should only refer to the TMO issues that are clear and obvious..." If it's bloody 'clear and obvious' there is no need for a TMO, because it is clear and fucking obvious! The point of a TMO is to pick up things that are not clear and obvious, like borderline tries. "Clear and obvious", bloody muppets. Just drop the TMO, apart from checking the actual grounding of tries, and the game would be much better. Then have a wider brief for the citing commissioner and sort it out after, show time, so we don't have to sit through boring TMO decisions at the game.
-
@machpants said in Law trials and changes set for 2017 and beyond:
This part makes no sense whatsoever: The "referee, who should only refer to the TMO issues that are clear and obvious..."
Nothing quite like dragging back a try for a poxy knock-on a ruck or two before. It's part of modern rugby
-
@machpants said in Law trials and changes set for 2017 and beyond:
@nzzp vomit
you look kind of green. Jealous of the TMO are we? Remember, they are there to help ...
-
Fuck off Gosper you total bell end.
-
-
@tim said in Law trials and changes set for 2017 and beyond:
Gosper gives one no confidence that his pronouncements are the result of coordinated analysis of refereeing ...
what the fuck is an Australian pontificating about rugby for anyway? They're fucking hopeless at it...
-
-
@bovidae said in Law trials and changes set for 2017 and beyond:
Based on what Gosper and Pichot have said in recent days rugby is in good hands eh.
what was Pichot's idiocy this time?
-
@mariner4life pichots idea was the world league or whatever it is.
Make test rugby great again...or still or not friendlies or something
-
-
@antipodean so there goes an upright tackle trying to hold the player and ball up to force a maul and turnover
-
@bovidae oh yea he did that too...although it is wrong cos the Beast isn't SA born is he?
-
@taniwharugby he's not in the squad!
-
@bones ah so selective then.
