Blues v Reds
-
@taniwharugby said in Blues vs. Reds:
@bones bit of both though...there is no consistency, with ref decisions or commentators knowing the rules.
Ref has been quite consistent IMO. He has just been bad. Off your feet has been hardly policed at all.
-
@bones said in Blues vs. Reds:
@nepia said in Blues vs. Reds:
@bones said in Blues vs. Reds:
For those want merhts over Marshall... He just had to ask what the ref calling a tackle means...
I'm with Mehrts on this one - that was a WTF decision
Oh bad decision, but that's not what it seemed he was questioning...
I thought he was confused by the bad decision, like the rest of us.
-
@hydro11 said in Blues vs. Reds:
@taniwharugby said in Blues vs. Reds:
@bones bit of both though...there is no consistency, with ref decisions or commentators knowing the rules.
Ref has been quite consistent IMO. He has just been bad. Off your feet has been hardly policed at all.
Consistently shit
-
@hydro11 said in Blues vs. Reds:
@taniwharugby said in Blues vs. Reds:
@bones bit of both though...there is no consistency, with ref decisions or commentators knowing the rules.
Ref has been quite consistent IMO. He has just been bad. Off your feet has been hardly policed at all.
Nah, he pinged the Blues for a few ruck offences in the first half when he was letting the Reds do what they want.
-