• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Wallabies v Ireland #1 - Brisvegas

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
181 Posts 35 Posters 10.3k Views
Wallabies v Ireland #1 - Brisvegas
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #115

    @no-quarter said in Wallabies v Ireland #1 - Brisvegas:

    @pukunui said in Wallabies v Ireland #1 - Brisvegas:

    Haha Aussie comms going full retard. Pretty simple, you can't tackle a guy who doesn't, and never did, have the ball. I don't give a shit if you thought he was going to get it. The fact he held him down afterwards just reinforces it.

    If tackling a dummy runner is now illegal than the game will be littered with penalties. Basically every backline move will result in one.

    Nah what Coleman did doesn’t happen that often. He picked the wrong man and then drove him into the ground and held him down. It was a simple cut out ball from Ireland that was completely misread. Poor play.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derm McCrum
    wrote on last edited by
    #116

    Good tackle by Henshaw to stop that initial attack. Pressure building though.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #117

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Wallabies v Ireland #1 - Brisvegas:

    @mn5 said in Wallabies v Ireland #1 - Brisvegas:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Wallabies v Ireland #1 - Brisvegas:

    I don't get why Pocock always gets rag dolled. He's built like a tank and lower to the ground. Is he really slow?

    It is weird. You'd expect him to be like Nonu but he ain't.

    Yeah or Mealamu. A nugget wrecking ball. He's bigger than Hooper, but Hooper runs km more than him.

    Too much gym strength not enough functional strength maybe?

    Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derm McCrum
    wrote on last edited by
    #118

    Ireland tiring more. Some players sucking hard.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • pukunuiP Offline
    pukunuiP Offline
    pukunui
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #119

    @no-quarter said in Wallabies v Ireland #1 - Brisvegas:

    @pukunui said in Wallabies v Ireland #1 - Brisvegas:

    Haha Aussie comms going full retard. Pretty simple, you can't tackle a guy who doesn't, and never did, have the ball. I don't give a shit if you thought he was going to get it. The fact he held him down afterwards just reinforces it.

    If tackling a dummy runner is now illegal than the game will be littered with penalties. Basically every backline move will result in one.

    Tackling a player without the ball has always been illegal.

    No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derm McCrum
    wrote on last edited by
    #120

    Great scrum by Australia at critical moment. Easy three.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    akan004
    wrote on last edited by
    #121

    Tongan Thor demolishes the overrated Irish scrum. Can we have him back and send back Lomax?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #122

    @mn5 said in Wallabies v Ireland #1 - Brisvegas:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Wallabies v Ireland #1 - Brisvegas:

    @mn5 said in Wallabies v Ireland #1 - Brisvegas:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Wallabies v Ireland #1 - Brisvegas:

    I don't get why Pocock always gets rag dolled. He's built like a tank and lower to the ground. Is he really slow?

    It is weird. You'd expect him to be like Nonu but he ain't.

    Yeah or Mealamu. A nugget wrecking ball. He's bigger than Hooper, but Hooper runs km more than him.

    Too much gym strength not enough functional strength maybe?

    Must be but Pocock is such a professional in everything he does. I would have thought he'd be focusing on what will be best for rugby. It's bizarre that he can't break a single tackle, even late in a game.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    replied to pukunui on last edited by
    #123

    @pukunui said in Wallabies v Ireland #1 - Brisvegas:

    @no-quarter said in Wallabies v Ireland #1 - Brisvegas:

    @pukunui said in Wallabies v Ireland #1 - Brisvegas:

    Haha Aussie comms going full retard. Pretty simple, you can't tackle a guy who doesn't, and never did, have the ball. I don't give a shit if you thought he was going to get it. The fact he held him down afterwards just reinforces it.

    If tackling a dummy runner is now illegal than the game will be littered with penalties. Basically every backline move will result in one.

    Tackling a player without the ball has always been illegal.

    Oh yeah, for sure. But I also see dummy runners - I.E players that put their hands up and feign catching the ball - get tackled all the time and no penalty results. To rub out a try where it had no impact on whether the try would be scored or not is ridiculously harsh.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derm McCrum
    wrote on last edited by
    #124

    Stockdale released ball there. But ref says ruck was formed.

    No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    replied to Derm McCrum on last edited by
    #125

    @derm-mccrum said in Wallabies v Ireland #1 - Brisvegas:

    Stockdale released ball there. But ref says ruck was formed.

    Yeah, he definitely released it and got back up. Should have just been play on.

    DamoD H 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derm McCrum
    wrote on last edited by
    #126

    Good try by Pocock. Ireland couldn’t resist pressure.

    Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    replied to pukunui on last edited by
    #127

    @pukunui said in Wallabies v Ireland #1 - Brisvegas:

    Haha Aussie comms going full retard. Pretty simple, you can't tackle a guy who doesn't, and never did, have the ball. I don't give a shit if you thought he was going to get it. The fact he held him down afterwards just reinforces it.

    But it's still bullshit. Because it is foul play you can go back however long you want, even if it is worth only a penalty. For everything else it is only two penalties. The ref plus two assistants missed the off the ball tackle at the time. As an aside, if they screwed up why is time not put back on the clock?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to Derm McCrum on last edited by
    #128

    @derm-mccrum said in Wallabies v Ireland #1 - Brisvegas:

    Good try by Pocock. Ireland couldn’t resist pressure.

    Tongan Thor helped with some interference there.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derm McCrum
    wrote on last edited by
    #129

    Conversion over. That’s the game I reckon. Don’t think Ireland have the game plan to come back here.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #130

    @no-quarter said in Wallabies v Ireland #1 - Brisvegas:

    @derm-mccrum said in Wallabies v Ireland #1 - Brisvegas:

    Stockdale released ball there. But ref says ruck was formed.

    Yeah, he definitely released it and got back up. Should have just been play on.

    I didn't think so. The ruck had formed around him, and by the time he stood up he was in an offside position. If he wanted to play the ball he needed to get onside first.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #131

    @no-quarter said in Wallabies v Ireland #1 - Brisvegas:

    @derm-mccrum said in Wallabies v Ireland #1 - Brisvegas:

    Stockdale released ball there. But ref says ruck was formed.

    Yeah, he definitely released it and got back up. Should have just been play on.

    Ref explained it well. If the ruck is formed around you (which it clearly was) you can't get up and play it again. Stockdale was lucky to stay on the field. Aussies would have scored if he didn't infringe.

    No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derm McCrum
    wrote on last edited by
    #132

    More sneaky stuff by Wallaby hands there.

    Murray needs to shut up though.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to Derm McCrum on last edited by
    #133

    @derm-mccrum said in Wallabies v Ireland #1 - Brisvegas:

    More sneaky stuff by Wallaby hands there.

    Murray needs to shut up though.

    It was, but the Irish foot kicked it out of his hands.

    Good gamesmanship.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by
    #134

    @hydro11 said in Wallabies v Ireland #1 - Brisvegas:

    @no-quarter said in Wallabies v Ireland #1 - Brisvegas:

    @derm-mccrum said in Wallabies v Ireland #1 - Brisvegas:

    Stockdale released ball there. But ref says ruck was formed.

    Yeah, he definitely released it and got back up. Should have just been play on.

    Ref explained it well. If the ruck is formed around you (which it clearly was) you can't get up and play it again. Stockdale was lucky to stay on the field. Aussies would have scored if he didn't infringe.

    Fair enough, have seen players get away with that but makes sense.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Wallabies v Ireland #1 - Brisvegas
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.