Spark Sport
-
@sneakdefreak said in And the winner of the RWC broadcasting rights is...:
Not many people seem that chuffed about this, considering TVNZ's coverage of the Comms Games. Why didn't Sky TV and Vodafone make a similar bid?
Sky is basically haemorrhaging money and subscribers. Because there has to be those 7 free to air games, same as last time, it wasn't worth them doing it. If they were allowed to put the entire RWC on Sky/paid only, then they would have bid and won IMO. But they're not allowed to, the final has to be free to air, waste of time for a struggling paid TV service
-
Looking forward to the RWC final with Toni Street referring to Kieran Read as Richie McCaw and asking how Daniel Carterβs preparation being ( while showing a shot of Beauden Barrett warming up)
Then doing a live cross to Sam Wallace walking around Toyko interviewing the locals -
I am pretty disgusted by this decision - that covers other tournaments too. Sky coverage has been excellent for past tournaments and I enjoy watching non-NZ matches. I expect a lot of kiwis will want to watch the Pacific Island matches too.
But, I can't be bothered with live-streaming to my laptop. Is it all about forcing kiwis to explore this option? -
Unless you're referring to pre-game and post-game 'shows', then SKY was never going to do the coverage of the 2019 RWC. The host broadcaster* provides a feed of the matches to the various right-holding broadcasters around the globe who beam it into your living room.
With TVNZ only showing seven games live, they're hardly going to throw the presenters at it that they did for the Comm Games, where they had 11 days of non-stop coverage over four feeds that they needed to package.
The real concern is how will Spark present their coverage given they have absolutely no history in broadcasting and production. They will have every All Black game, and every playoff game. Who will anchor their coverage? Which former Internationals will be their studio experts? Will SKY allow their contracted former ABs jump ship for six weeks?
*The Host Broadcaster is Japan and given they don't have a sophisticated rugby broadcasting pedigree they are no doubt going to dip into experts broadcasters and producers from England, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand... therefore some of the SKY crew. But that would be the case whether SKY, TVNZ, Three or Trackside won the rights.
-
@stargazer said in And the winner of the RWC broadcasting rights is...:
My internet connection is slow and I don't have unlimited broadband. There's a higher price tag for many people than just paying for the package that Spark is going to offer.
Yup. For those of us without a landline and outside main centres, live streaming isn't exactly a great option.
-
Don't forget TV3 won the 2007 world cup (that's from memory) -- we got to see Mehrts as a colour commentator in the studio, and it was quality
As someone said, Sky would just be rebroadcasting with their own commentary. All the pictures will be from the local broadcaster. That said, they are the best in the world at rugby pictures I reckon, so could have a line on supporting the local broadcaster with tech and people on the ground ...
Edit: https://www.nbr.co.nz/article/tv3-wins-broadcast-rights-rugby-world-cup
article from 2005 -
2007 TV3 had Hamish MacKay as the lead commentator. Is he around somewhere else these days? As nzzp notes, they had Merts, as well as people like John Hart - there's no real shortage of ex-Rugby players who can provide colour commentary from the studio - lots of guys who turn up on "The Breakdown" etc occasionally, who can only be under casual/freelance type contracts with Sky.
More concerned with who they'll have actually calling the match. I fear they'll go with the "experience" of John McBeth and we'll get something from the 1980s.
Biggest concern though is quite what the streaming experience will be out in the sticks.
On the plus side, I imagine the games will be played to cater for the big NH audiences so probably not kicking off till around midnight NZ time, so I'm unlikely to watch too much live. If we assume the ABs games will play live on TVNZ (and others will be delayed) that side of things might be OK.
-
A combo of John McBeth and Keith Quinn
-
@nzzp said in And the winner of the RWC broadcasting rights is...:
Don't forget TV3 won the 2007 world cup (that's from memory) -- we got to see Mehrts as a colour commentator in the studio, and it was quality
As someone said, Sky would just be rebroadcasting with their own commentary. All the pictures will be from the local broadcaster. That said, they are the best in the world at rugby pictures I reckon, so could have a line on supporting the local broadcaster with tech and people on the ground ...
Edit: https://www.nbr.co.nz/article/tv3-wins-broadcast-rights-rugby-world-cup
article from 2005TV3 in 2007 did already broadcast the FTA rugby under the then deal. They had some expertise at taking a sky feed and doing something with it.
Modern TVNZ is a hollow shell.
I suppose they've had had America Cup, that's the only stuff I can think of that they've done during the last 25 years. They have no expertise anymore.
-
I wonder if the FTA stuff will be broadcast in HD again?
TV1 & TV3 broadcast their FTA stuff in 2007 FTA, but unless you had the HD ticket, none of the Sky stuff was, so you were better off watching the matches aired on FTA on 1 or 3 (3 had Merhts IIRC, so that one)
-
@chris-b said in And the winner of the RWC broadcasting rights is...:
2007 TV3 had Hamish MacKay as the lead commentator. Is he around somewhere else these days? As nzzp notes, they had Merts, as well as people like John Hart - there's no real shortage of ex-Rugby players who can provide colour commentary from the studio - lots of guys who turn up on "The Breakdown" etc occasionally, who can only be under casual/freelance type contracts with Sky.
More concerned with who they'll have actually calling the match. I fear they'll go with the "experience" of John McBeth and we'll get something from the 1980s.
Biggest concern though is quite what the streaming experience will be out in the sticks.
On the plus side, I imagine the games will be played to cater for the big NH audiences so probably not kicking off till around midnight NZ time, so I'm unlikely to watch too much live. If we assume the ABs games will play live on TVNZ (and others will be delayed) that side of things might be OK.
If Nisbo etc is tied down by an exclusive contract.
I'd be happy with a Tom Conroy? Used to do TV gig down in Southland on local tv? Sometimes on Grassroots rugby. Assume he had a radio background. Him plus an ex-player or coach comments man.
Variety is good.
-
@rapido said in And the winner of the RWC broadcasting rights is...:
@chris-b said in And the winner of the RWC broadcasting rights is...:
If Nisbo etc is tied down by an exclusive contract.
I suspect the main Sky guys are - they didn't feature in 2007.
-
@stockcar86 said in And the winner of the RWC broadcasting rights is...:
A combo of John McBeth and Keith Quinn
Too many old white men. Diversity will trump rugby knowledge so they'll have Anika Moa and Golriz Ghahraman calling the game. John Campbell and Hillary Barry in the studio.
It could happen and you know it.