• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Highlanders v Crusaders

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
highlanderscrusaders
197 Posts 42 Posters 8.8k Views
Highlanders v Crusaders
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #176

    Works hard. Not dynamic. Not from England.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    9
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #177

    @mariner4life bit like his brother huh...

    mariner4lifeM KiwiMurphK 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #178

    @bones said in Highlanders v Crusaders:

    @mariner4life bit like his brother huh...

    The shit ones? Absolutely.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Bones on last edited by KiwiMurph
    #179

    @bones @mariner4life

    Yeah no one is going to confuse Luke with....

    alt text

    ACT CrusaderA taniwharugbyT 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #180

    @kiwimurph said in Highlanders v Crusaders:

    @bones @mariner4life

    Yeah no one is going to confuse Luke with....

    alt text

    I’m a bit disappointed. I could’ve sworn that was an 80 metre run the last time I told someone about that try....

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #181

    @kiwimurph was only the Reds 🙄 he shoulda been able to play and win that game on his own 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #182

    @act-crusader said in Highlanders v Crusaders:

    I’m a bit disappointed. I could’ve sworn that was an 80 metre run the last time I told someone about that try....

    180? Rounding up is fine for that one.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #183

    @duluth said in Highlanders v Crusaders:

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/102398745/heat-needs-to-go-on-sanzaar-in-wake-of-controversial-call-in-dunedin

    Bitterness from the Cantab journo ...

    StargazerS Crazy HorseC 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #184

    @booboo Not really ...

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/102410124/sanzaar-referees-boss-lyndon-bray-set-to-issue-warning-to-all-super-rugby-teams

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/102429310/highlanders-waiting-for-clarity-from-sanzaar-in-the-aftermath-of-ben-smith-controversy

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #185

    Anti Cantab bullshit aside, @booboo would you be comfortable if it was the BIL captain who did it during a test last year?

    I didn't see the incident so curious about people's opinions on this.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #186

    If a player is blocking a conversion they should be penalised.

    Would be outraged if another team did it to the ABs.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Crazy Horse on last edited by booboo
    #187

    @crazy-horse said in Highlanders v Crusaders:

    Anti Cantab bullshit aside, @booboo would you be comfortable if it was the BIL captain who did it during a test last year?

    I didn't see the incident so curious about people's opinions on this.

    I didn't see it either ... or more correctly don't recall it.

    And I don't like what was described.

    Still comes across as bitter.

    Would Knowler be praising the Cantab skipper for "standing up" for his team if it was reversed?

    Was the right decision made?

    Perhaps Briant should have penalised Smith ... ? You can ask the question as captain but you can't fluff your bunny.

    Still funny seeing the Cantabs whinge ...

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • WurzelW Offline
    WurzelW Offline
    Wurzel
    wrote on last edited by
    #188

    The boss of SANZAAR isn't impressed with Ben Smith's soccer-like pleading with the ref...

    Stuff
    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #189

    Lessons to be learned for all - players AND officials.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • pukunuiP Offline
    pukunuiP Offline
    pukunui
    wrote on last edited by
    #190

    Total over reaction to this whole thing.
    Ben Smith didn't do anything i haven't see happen 100 times over the last few years.

    I would rather the refs got the call right in the first place. It was pretty clear the ball bounced, so check it.

    I would have liked it if Read had put similar pressure on both french fucks when we got screwed at the end of the 2nd and 3rd Lions tests.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    wrote on last edited by
    #191

    I know I'm not an impartial judge on this one, but the more we see stuff like this the more I think we need a system of appeals/reviews in rugby. I'm not quite sure how to implement it, but I think maybe 3 reviews, if successful the review is lost, (with a 4th given after 3 successes), and a sub lost if unsuccessful (borrowing from the nfl). Encourage the ref to make a call on the field, and let the captains challenge if they miss something. That way in this scenario the ref can ask 'is this your appeal', and the captain either puts up or shuts up.

    Would need some fine tuning about how many appeals, what and when you can appeal and how to restart play but I think that is the way to go.

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • pukunuiP Offline
    pukunuiP Offline
    pukunui
    wrote on last edited by
    #192

    I don't think it needs some gimmicky system.
    How about if the captain has something specific he thinks the ref should check he asks the ref to have a look. The ref can quickly ask the tmo to check if they need to take a closer look. If it looks like something might have happened then take a look. If not then continue on. If it becomes clear that the captain is just clutching at straws at every decision then tell him to piss off.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Cyclops on last edited by
    #193

    @cyclops said in Highlanders v Crusaders:

    I know I'm not an impartial judge on this one, but the more we see stuff like this the more I think we need a system of appeals/reviews in rugby. I'm not quite sure how to implement it, but I think maybe 3 reviews, if successful the review is lost, (with a 4th given after 3 successes), and a sub lost if unsuccessful (borrowing from the nfl). Encourage the ref to make a call on the field, and let the captains challenge if they miss something. That way in this scenario the ref can ask 'is this your appeal', and the captain either puts up or shuts up.

    Would need some fine tuning about how many appeals, what and when you can appeal and how to restart play but I think that is the way to go.

    The problem is that according to the refs they were talking about reviewing as Smith approached. In the review system that opens a can of worms on whether you lose a review because you weren't aware of what the refs were saying over their comms.
    I would prefer it if the TMO was just onto it for every try and the ref checked with him before allowing the conversion whether they needed to wait a moment and have a look. Don't need to stop and have a conversation every time, just stop the clock after awarding a try and the conversion can't be taken until the ref gives the all clear. A simple 'have you spotted anything to look at?'
    I think that is kind of what happens anyway but because the clock is ticking it adds an element of panic and urgency resulting in what we saw Bender do.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #194

    @crucial but as someone else has raised, bit antiquated that once the conversion is taken the try stands, why is that a thing? Surely as long as the kickoff isn't taken then it's not a problem.

    CrucialC mimicM 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #195

    @bones said in Highlanders v Crusaders:

    @crucial but as someone else has raised, bit antiquated that once the conversion is taken the try stands, why is that a thing? Surely as long as the kickoff isn't taken then it's not a problem.

    I agree but that only shifts the cutoff line. What is wrong with stopping the clock? You can start it again when the ref oks the conversion attempt.
    That way the captain knows that the ref team have had look back and haven't spotted anything obvious enough to warrant stopping the game for. He has to accept that is the end of it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Highlanders v Crusaders
Rugby Matches
highlanderscrusaders
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.