Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket
-
Or how long you can profess to keep it on the pitch and have a beer afterwards when your onfield approach is feral. There is only so much you can let go. Always thought the contact nature of league and rugby made it easier to let go. Aside from when it's clear someone is trying to injure you... just ask Richie.
-
Australian cricket apparently live streamed the first test for free, and offers the last three for NZD$25. Really interseting - first time I've seen rights being offered outside the home country for something like this.
-
@taniwharugby said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@nzzp yeah RS were promoting that this morning.
Nice - didn't listen to RS. 8 bucks a test - if it wasn't crazy late, I"d spring for that.
Seriously thinking about the NFL fanpass. Couple of hundy, and shedloads of good games to watch later this year.
-
-
-
@barbarian said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
I'm not a fan of the masks either. It feels icky to me. She did nothing wrong with SBW, and neither did he.
There are plenty of reasons to bag Warner, but this one... nah. It's low rent and nasty.
Collateral damage from being married to a dickwad I guess.
@Baron-Silas-Greenback will get online to heroically defend her honour though.
-
@mn5 said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@barbarian said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
I'm not a fan of the masks either. It feels icky to me. She did nothing wrong with SBW, and neither did he.
There are plenty of reasons to bag Warner, but this one... nah. It's low rent and nasty.
Collateral damage from being married to a dickwad I guess.
That's pretty fucked.
-
@barbarian said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@mn5 said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@barbarian said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
I'm not a fan of the masks either. It feels icky to me. She did nothing wrong with SBW, and neither did he.
There are plenty of reasons to bag Warner, but this one... nah. It's low rent and nasty.
Collateral damage from being married to a dickwad I guess.
That's pretty fucked.
Plenty suffer far worse. It's what she signed up for.
-
@mokey said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Two thoughts.
Sledging about family members is shitty and lacking any kind of wit. They aren't there to defend themselves, or hand out a sharp knee to the balls. I mean fuck, if you have a butt ugly boofhead like Warner, and the best you can do is talk shit about his wife, you'd have to be pretty thick yourself.
Warner was foolish to make it about defending her 'honour'. This is not the 50s. Who fucking cares if she had fun as a single. It's not like cricketers walk around wearing chastity belts before they get married (or after they get married...) so now all he's done is made her past a THING.Must suck being in the public eye like that. All the bullshit she must get from fuckwits that decide she's a "slut" just because she, like those fuckwits and millions of other men and women, had a bit of fun in her younger single years.
Warner needs more self-control though, if anyone makes lame remarks he just needs to laugh it off. Blowing it up like this really doesn't help, they've got a young family now so avoiding this type of nonsense should be a priority.
-
@mn5 said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@barbarian said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
I'm not a fan of the masks either. It feels icky to me. She did nothing wrong with SBW, and neither did he.
There are plenty of reasons to bag Warner, but this one... nah. It's low rent and nasty.
Collateral damage from being married to a dickwad I guess.
@Baron-Silas-Greenback will get online to heroically defend her honour though.
Its not about her. It's about getting at Davey. Now if they start chanting that Mrs Dumb Dumb is a slag/ whore/ etc then that is out of line