• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Crusaders vs Chiefs

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
chiefscrusaders
150 Posts 34 Posters 6.0k Views
Crusaders vs Chiefs
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by
    #117

    @hydro11 said in Crusaders vs. Chiefs:

    If Alaatoa is a red because ducking doesn't matter - that has to be a Yellow card and penalty try.

    If you want to bring that into then, I thought Boshier would have got the diving defence, attacker was diving so, so reduced to no penalty.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • JayCeeJ Offline
    JayCeeJ Offline
    JayCee
    wrote on last edited by
    #118

    Thats fucked. Lead with your head and youre untouchable

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #119

    P.S. A great game rendered a futile exercise by overzealous official.

    Very 21st century.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    wrote on last edited by
    #120

    I was settling in to watch the Tahs v Stormers just because it’s some rugby, but I can’t be fucked now.

    Decent game ruined.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Steven Harris
    wrote on last edited by
    #121

    Might as well play tiddly winks..!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote on last edited by
    #122

    RC for Taimanivalu?

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote on last edited by
    #123

    Fucking McKenzie.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote on last edited by
    #124

    Well deserved win to the Saders as it turns out.

    The Saders should be one of the better sides, but it looks like it is going to be a long year for us.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #125

    Wait, the shit barrett didn't drop that? Jesus...

    Patriots indeed.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #126

    Ive lost count of how many errors DMac has made tonight.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #127

    @gt12 said in Crusaders vs. Chiefs:

    RC for Taimanivalu?

    Forceful contact with the head, it should have been.

    Who cares that M Mac almost fell into his knee, ‘falling tackler’ isn’t a defence these days.
    Who cares that it was purely accidental, contact with the head is contact with the head.

    Come on refs stick to the rules.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #128

    @gt12 said in Crusaders vs. Chiefs:

    Fucking McKenzie.

    Chiefs fans will get used to saying that too now he's their first choice five-eighth.

    1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Steven Harris
    wrote on last edited by
    #129

    No question the better side has won this evening,
    but all you ever ask for consistency from the officials,having watched all 4 x games..inconsistency in around the high tackle interpretation is already creating confusion for supporters and viewers.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    replied to Steven Harris on last edited by
    #130

    @steven-harris said in Crusaders vs. Chiefs:

    The rules are there for safety purposes but I fear every game I am going to be watching this year is going to have problem in and around high tackles which is going to hugely influence results.

    Except Steven that the laws aren't there for safety mate, they're primarily there to appease social and mainstream media, lest they lower rugby's appeal to corporate sponsorship.

    These administrators and lawmakers have made a pigs breakfast of the game since the last WC and their sole objective has been to placate social justice fuckwits who'd never travel to a game rather than the people who actually "own" and love the game.

    If you're fair dinkum about player welfare, then you start by decreasing the games played, not try to micro manage every fucking collision.

    That yellow and penalty try make the game barely recognisable, and random as a legitimate contest.

    A pox on them all

    antipodeanA MajorRageM 2 Replies Last reply
    12
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to Siam on last edited by
    #131

    @siam said in Crusaders vs. Chiefs:

    @steven-harris said in Crusaders vs. Chiefs:

    The rules are there for safety purposes but I fear every game I am going to be watching this year is going to have problem in and around high tackles which is going to hugely influence results.

    Except Steven that the laws aren't there for safety mate, they're primarily there to appease social and mainstream media, lest they lower rugby's appeal to corporate sponsorship.

    These administrators and lawmakers have made a pigs breakfast of the game since the last WC and their sole objective has been to placate social justice fuckwits who'd never travel to a game rather than the people who actually "own" and love the game.

    If you're fair dinkum about player welfare, then you start by decreasing the games played, not try to micro manage every fucking collision.

    That yellow and penalty try make the game barely recognisable, and random as a legitimate contest.

    A pox on them all

    Quoted just so everyone can read that twice.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    wrote on last edited by
    #132

    I'm sympathetic to the lawmakers on this one. The research from the NFL is terrifying and the physicality of the game is only increasing which will mean more and more concussion and head trauma. We can't just accept it as a cost of the game but there is clearly more work needed to get the balance right because I agree that the too often good tackles are being penalised.

    I don't think shortening the season will be a solution though since the nfl season is 16 to 20 games, or about half the length of the rugby one.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • pukunuiP Offline
    pukunuiP Offline
    pukunui
    wrote on last edited by
    #133

    Pretty messy game compared to last night. But a few decent plays.

    I agree the high tackle card lottery is a fucking joke but that penalty try was the most clear cut example of a penalty try and yellow that you can get. It was a massive high tackle as he was diving for the line. If you can't see that you are blind.
    Heres how to stop him legally, don't hit him in the fucking head. If you need to let him pass slightly so you get him side on and he scores the try then tough shit. You don't get a free high tackle because he is diving to score.

    Ngatai was wasted at 15. But i guess he will be out for 6 weeks injured now. Cane awesome as usual. Dmac still doesn't look like a 10. Maybe 9 is where he should be, TJP style broken field play with goal kicking as a bonus.
    For the Crusaders Goodhue was good. Don't rate Bridge but a few good plays in the final 10 min.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRage
    replied to Siam on last edited by
    #134

    @siam said in Crusaders vs. Chiefs:

    @steven-harris said in Crusaders vs. Chiefs:

    The rules are there for safety purposes but I fear every game I am going to be watching this year is going to have problem in and around high tackles which is going to hugely influence results.

    Except Steven that the laws aren't there for safety mate, they're primarily there to appease social and mainstream media, lest they lower rugby's appeal to corporate sponsorship.

    These administrators and lawmakers have made a pigs breakfast of the game since the last WC and their sole objective has been to placate social justice fuckwits who'd never travel to a game rather than the people who actually "own" and love the game.

    If you're fair dinkum about player welfare, then you start by decreasing the games played, not try to micro manage every fucking collision.

    That yellow and penalty try make the game barely recognisable, and random as a legitimate contest.

    A pox on them all

    I came on here to rant about the stupidity of the laws, but this sums it up far more eloquently than I could have. Spot. On.

    Too much enthusiasm to put people in the bin, not enough enthusiasm to look at what the players are actually trying to achieve.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.
    replied to pukunui on last edited by
    #135

    @pukunui said in Crusaders vs. Chiefs:

    Heres how to stop him legally, don't hit him in the fucking head. If you need to let him pass slightly so you get him side on and he scores the try then tough shit. You don't get a free high tackle because he is diving to score.

    That's spot on.

    Mainly, what I've seen this weekend is that if you hit people around the neck or head you're probably going to the bin. I haven't found it too confusing.

    Pretty scrappy game - useful points - onwards and upwards.

    NepiaN mariner4lifeM 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by Chris B.
    #136

    @mariner4life

    Pom..Pom..Pom Pom Pom Pom Pom Pom
    Pom..Pom..Pom Pom Pom Pom Pom Pom
    Hmmmmmm, Hmm Hmmm, Hmmmmmm, Hmm, Hmmmmm
    Hmmmmmm, Hmm Hmmm, Hmmmmmm, Hmm, Hmmmmm...........

    [Horses galloping around the field....]

    Don't Forget!!!

    🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

Crusaders vs Chiefs
Rugby Matches
chiefscrusaders
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.