• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

ABs v Scotland

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksscotland
536 Posts 67 Posters 43.0k Views
ABs v Scotland
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    replied to chimoaus on last edited by
    #506

    @chimoaus said in ABs v Scotland:

    Anyone know the laws in AFL?, those guys practically wrestle in the air.

    fucking play on

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #507

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to infidel on last edited by
    #508

    @infidel said in ABs v Scotland:

    Some random thoughts, was at Murrayfield for the first time.

    We were in corporate hosting, Doddie Weir was our MC, he was absolutely hilarious. Very moving when he went onto the field before kickoff. Justin Marshall also present, dull by comparison.

    Battling win, probably deserved, with about 7 minutes to go the ABs were up by 12. I think Hansen emptied the bench too early. He was basically saying with 10 minutes to go it was all over.

    Thought the ref was very good, he seemed to rule absolutely everything, probably better than the other way and allowing a free for all. Did think he got the Naholo situation wrong, yellow card all day for me, massive benefit of doubt there.

    Taylor was very good and a credible replacement for Coles as starter which is a good thing. Should have dummied Russell when try butchered!

    Romano from the replay poor, needs to get lower on the carry, but was on his own once at least surrounded by four Scots, need your teammates there to help you out sometimes.

    Read must be running on empty, thought he had a very, very quiet game, apart from lineout.

    Fifita got through a lot of work, mostly good.

    Big fan of Liam Squire, massive potential. Should have passed when he made the big break but I guess he thought Sopoaga would get tackled. He did pick the ball off that scrum in preference to Kieran Reid.

    Echo what others have said about Edinburgh, great city to go for a test match.

    Pakman seems you went to the Hilton buffet so you could rub shoulders with Kane Hames and Crockett, love your work. 😀

    Did he have one of those obnoxious tartan suits on? It takes a real character to pull those off. He is a real funny bugger judging by some YouTube footage I've seen.

    C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    Crash
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #509

    @mn5 The Scots are funny buggers though. Anyone who calls themselves"Doddie Weir" or "Dusty Hare" can't take themselves too seriously..

    RapidoR T 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    replied to Crash on last edited by
    #510

    @crash said in ABs v Scotland:

    @mn5 The Scots are funny buggers though. Anyone who calls themselves"Doddie Weir" or "Dusty Hare" can't take themselves too seriously..

    Dusty Hare was English, though.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    Talisker
    replied to Crash on last edited by
    #511

    @crash

    Dod or Doddie is a shortened version of George in Scotland.

    My favourite off-field Doddie moment was from the Lions - they were doing media training and being asked questions to see how they would respond, Doddie was asked why he'd been spotted out drinking late in a night club before a game and he said, "Mistaken identity"

    "Could you tell us who the B&I Lions player it was then?

    Doddie says, "My father is out on tour with us"

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Rapido on last edited by
    #512

    @rapido said in ABs v Scotland:

    @crash said in ABs v Scotland:

    @mn5 The Scots are funny buggers though. Anyone who calls themselves"Doddie Weir" or "Dusty Hare" can't take themselves too seriously..

    Dusty Hare was English, though.

    This

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to infidel on last edited by
    #513

    @infidel said in ABs v Scotland:

    Pakman seems you went to the Hilton buffet so you could rub shoulders with Kane Hames and Crockett, love your work.

    Took my son up in 2005 and we did same. He spoke to Rieko Gear, whom he said was very friendly. Carl Hayman he said less so.

    He wanted to repeat, so we did.

    Dirty job, but someone's got to do it!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to infidel on last edited by
    #514

    @infidel said in ABs v Scotland:

    @antipodean
    It's his job to see what Hogg is doing. Hogg has the rights.
    Naholo has to err on the side of caution for me, let's stick to the facts, Naholo tackled Hogg in mid-air.

    That's why he was penalised. This isn't difficult to grasp.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #515

    In the comments, several people are saying that it is a Glasgow move.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    akan004
    wrote on last edited by
    #516

    Except Jones was half a metre in front of the kicker in the game against the ABs and the try should have been disallowed.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to akan004 on last edited by
    #517

    @akan004 said in ABs v Scotland:

    Except Jones was half a metre in front of the kicker in the game against the ABs and the try should have been disallowed.

    Just saw that. Was it Jones or the bloke further inside?

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #518

    @booboo Jones. Its basically the same situation for what Hooper got his try denied v England.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #519

    @kiwimurph protest time? This impacts our defensive aura!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Billy TellB Offline
    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy Tell
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #520

    @taniwharugby said in ABs v Scotland:

    @hydro11 looked more like he was swatting a fly, so that mitigates him hitting the ball.

    As I said elsewhere, Crockett being pinged for playing the 9 without the ball was wrong, regardless of what the 9 is allowed to do, his hands were on the ball so therefore not played without the ball.

    This is an area they need to clear up, touching it and taking your hands away seems to be quite a popular thing in the NH at moment.

    Think you’re wrong there. I think they clarified that hands on the ball doesn’t count it’s lifting the ball off the ground. It was a clarification about a year ago or so.

    CrucialC taniwharugbyT 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Billy Tell on last edited by
    #521

    @billy-tell said in ABs v Scotland:

    @taniwharugby said in ABs v Scotland:

    @hydro11 looked more like he was swatting a fly, so that mitigates him hitting the ball.

    As I said elsewhere, Crockett being pinged for playing the 9 without the ball was wrong, regardless of what the 9 is allowed to do, his hands were on the ball so therefore not played without the ball.

    This is an area they need to clear up, touching it and taking your hands away seems to be quite a popular thing in the NH at moment.

    Think you’re wrong there. I think they clarified that hands on the ball doesn’t count it’s lifting the ball off the ground. It was a clarification about a year ago or so.

    @billy-tell said in ABs v Scotland:

    @taniwharugby said in ABs v Scotland:

    @hydro11 looked more like he was swatting a fly, so that mitigates him hitting the ball.

    As I said elsewhere, Crockett being pinged for playing the 9 without the ball was wrong, regardless of what the 9 is allowed to do, his hands were on the ball so therefore not played without the ball.

    This is an area they need to clear up, touching it and taking your hands away seems to be quite a popular thing in the NH at moment.

    Think you’re wrong there. I think they clarified that hands on the ball doesn’t count it’s lifting the ball off the ground. It was a clarification about a year ago or so.

    Correct. What is missing is the change of interpretation on a halfback not being allowed to dummy from the base.
    A dummy should include hands on the lifting them without the ball

    Billy TellB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • Billy TellB Offline
    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy Tell
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #522

    @majorrage said in ABs v Scotland:

    @talisker to be fair, what is deemed racist / offensive in modern, overtly PC, lets take offense to anything we can, Britain does differ somewhat to what is deemed acceptable in New Zealand / Australia.

    Poms, Paki's are 2 things I regularly used in NZ which I found were not deemed offensive at all in NZ, which had different meanings over here. I've not heard that Jock was in that category, and if so, then I'll be sure to not use it in conversation here.

    But lets be clear, that this place is rather light heartened, and shouldn't really be taken seriously. I mean, have you read some of the points of view and thoughts .... ?

    I got a shock in Ireland where Pom is a bit of a no-go word. It’s fine to use it in nz.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Billy Tell on last edited by taniwharugby
    #523

    @billy-tell Not what I was meaning, I was referring to the terminology used, his hands were ON THE BALL, ref saying played without the ball is technically incorrect.

    I understand the daft change to the rule, but if they change rules they need ot change the terminology too, should be ball was not out, which is applicable to more than just that scenario.

    @Crucial the French 9 threw a dummy against us, the mungo comms guy was lauding the move.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Billy TellB Offline
    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy Tell
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #524

    @crucial said in ABs v Scotland:

    @billy-tell said in ABs v Scotland:

    @taniwharugby said in ABs v Scotland:

    @hydro11 looked more like he was swatting a fly, so that mitigates him hitting the ball.

    As I said elsewhere, Crockett being pinged for playing the 9 without the ball was wrong, regardless of what the 9 is allowed to do, his hands were on the ball so therefore not played without the ball.

    This is an area they need to clear up, touching it and taking your hands away seems to be quite a popular thing in the NH at moment.

    Think you’re wrong there. I think they clarified that hands on the ball doesn’t count it’s lifting the ball off the ground. It was a clarification about a year ago or so.

    @billy-tell said in ABs v Scotland:

    @taniwharugby said in ABs v Scotland:

    @hydro11 looked more like he was swatting a fly, so that mitigates him hitting the ball.

    As I said elsewhere, Crockett being pinged for playing the 9 without the ball was wrong, regardless of what the 9 is allowed to do, his hands were on the ball so therefore not played without the ball.

    This is an area they need to clear up, touching it and taking your hands away seems to be quite a popular thing in the NH at moment.

    Think you’re wrong there. I think they clarified that hands on the ball doesn’t count it’s lifting the ball off the ground. It was a clarification about a year ago or so.

    Correct. What is missing is the change of interpretation on a halfback not being allowed to dummy from the base.
    A dummy should include hands on the lifting them without the ball

    Ah the nick farr Jones law. No dummy from the half. In the days when you used sand to kick goals, team going forward won the maul, you had to have a foot on the ground to take a mark, and rucks were rucks.

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Billy Tell on last edited by
    #525

    @billy-tell said in ABs v Scotland:

    @crucial said in ABs v Scotland:

    @billy-tell said in ABs v Scotland:

    @taniwharugby said in ABs v Scotland:

    @hydro11 looked more like he was swatting a fly, so that mitigates him hitting the ball.

    As I said elsewhere, Crockett being pinged for playing the 9 without the ball was wrong, regardless of what the 9 is allowed to do, his hands were on the ball so therefore not played without the ball.

    This is an area they need to clear up, touching it and taking your hands away seems to be quite a popular thing in the NH at moment.

    Think you’re wrong there. I think they clarified that hands on the ball doesn’t count it’s lifting the ball off the ground. It was a clarification about a year ago or so.

    @billy-tell said in ABs v Scotland:

    @taniwharugby said in ABs v Scotland:

    @hydro11 looked more like he was swatting a fly, so that mitigates him hitting the ball.

    As I said elsewhere, Crockett being pinged for playing the 9 without the ball was wrong, regardless of what the 9 is allowed to do, his hands were on the ball so therefore not played without the ball.

    This is an area they need to clear up, touching it and taking your hands away seems to be quite a popular thing in the NH at moment.

    Think you’re wrong there. I think they clarified that hands on the ball doesn’t count it’s lifting the ball off the ground. It was a clarification about a year ago or so.

    Correct. What is missing is the change of interpretation on a halfback not being allowed to dummy from the base.
    A dummy should include hands on the lifting them without the ball

    Ah the nick farr Jones law. No dummy from the half. In the days when you used sand to kick goals, team going forward won the maul, you had to have a foot on the ground to take a mark, and rucks were rucks.

    The Law is still in the books and 99.9% of the time halfbacks no longer try the big dummy from the base. That should now extend to dummying picking up the ball.

    Chester DrawsC 1 Reply Last reply
    0

ABs v Scotland
Rugby Matches
allblacksscotland
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.