Crusaders v Highlanders (QF)
-
@Billy-Tell said in Crusaders v Highlanders (QF):
So if you're a Highlander and your life depending on telling the truth...
Did the Crusaders score there?
Probably more than they legally scored their first.
-
@Hooroo said in Crusaders v Highlanders (QF):
That's fucking bullshit. That should have have been 'any reason I can't give the try'
That doesn't exist any more. Sooooo 2016.
It's onfield decision: try vs no try in ref's opinion.
-
HIghlanders look like a bunch of dudes that arrived in Christchurch on a row boat at 1pm....
-
@Stockcar86 You lucky man I don't have that option in the UK.
-
@Billy-Tell said in Crusaders v Highlanders (QF):
@Hooroo said in Crusaders v Highlanders (QF):
That's fucking bullshit. That should have have been 'any reason I can't give the try'
That doesn't exist any more. Sooooo 2016.
It's onfield decision: try vs no try in ref's opinion.
Fair dinkum? Can they not ask that now?
-
Exactly. When those were contestable kicks, they had meaning, but right now they are just going to Saders. Plus, the chase is shit too.had they focused on working for territory, I think they'd still be losing, but would have got some points out of that half.
-
@KiwiMurph said in Crusaders v Highlanders (QF):
Highlanders are not built to play in these conditions.
Why do people think this?
-
Are you sure Gardner you have fucked most things up tonight
-
Taminavalu's first contact when he dived on the player on the ground was upper arm to the head. No slipping up, just straight contact.
These yellow card rules as they are currently enforced are too arbitary, too random and the punishment affects the game too much
Saders kickihg better in the wet though.
-
@Hooroo said in Crusaders v Highlanders (QF):
@Billy-Tell said in Crusaders v Highlanders (QF):
@Hooroo said in Crusaders v Highlanders (QF):
That's fucking bullshit. That should have have been 'any reason I can't give the try'
That doesn't exist any more. Sooooo 2016.
It's onfield decision: try vs no try in ref's opinion.
Fair dinkum? Can they not ask that now?
Don't think so.
-
@taniwharugby Ah, of course. It's Pryor.