Hurricanes v B&I Lions
-
@antipodean said in Hurricanes v B&I Lions:
What sort of refereeing was that?
LEAVE IT! LEAVE THE BALL! OK you got it
-
Chance to bring the score to back within 2 tries and they take the Baabaas option and kick for the corner. They are not here to win, just trying to play a bit of razzle dazzle instead. Extremely disappointing.
-
@Nepia said in Hurricanes v B&I Lions:
Why would the Canes go for a driving maul with their backs?
Because NZ backs have been shithouse dealing with the rush defence?
-
@MN5 said in Hurricanes v B&I Lions:
@MiketheSnow said in Hurricanes v B&I Lions:
@MN5 said in Hurricanes v B&I Lions:
@MiketheSnow said in Hurricanes v B&I Lions:
@MN5 said in Hurricanes v B&I Lions:
@MiketheSnow said in Hurricanes v B&I Lions:
@MN5 said in Hurricanes v B&I Lions:
Scotsman intercepts. Passes to another Scotsman to motor away for the try.....
You can stick your fucken arse up your arse Gatland. That was quality yet neither will be in your 23 for Saturday.
Well taken try but if you think either or both should be in the 2nd Test 23 you need your head read.
Laidlaw no. Seymour yes.
I have Scottish blood. It's in my nature to be antagonistic and angry.
Get Davies on FFS.
Is 23-7 enough of a buffer boyo?
Not when Laidlaw throws away possession and kicks so shitly
Laidlaw is #rugbyjesus
.....according to a Scots rugby forum I follow.
Mind you some of them thought 10 Scots would tour so this may be slightly over optimistic.
Comedy Gold 👏 😂
-
@Crazy-Horse said in Hurricanes v B&I Lions:
@Nepia said in Hurricanes v B&I Lions:
Why would the Canes go for a driving maul with their backs?
Because NZ backs have been shithouse dealing with the rush defence?
Laumape and Aso can take it back into traffic if need be. Either way, it's better than two failed mauls.
-
2c worth at halftime
Lions possibly deserve a slight lead. But certainly not the margin they have.
Surely offside for intercept.
Our ground big screen producers have a shit load to learn from Saffers Poms and Welsh.
Poite remains Random. Romaine... Randome ...
Not out of reach. But long way to cone back.
-
This is a flash back to the canes of years gone by
-
@MiketheSnow said in Hurricanes v B&I Lions:
@MN5 said in Hurricanes v B&I Lions:
@MiketheSnow said in Hurricanes v B&I Lions:
@MN5 said in Hurricanes v B&I Lions:
@MiketheSnow said in Hurricanes v B&I Lions:
@MN5 said in Hurricanes v B&I Lions:
@MiketheSnow said in Hurricanes v B&I Lions:
@MN5 said in Hurricanes v B&I Lions:
Scotsman intercepts. Passes to another Scotsman to motor away for the try.....
You can stick your fucken arse up your arse Gatland. That was quality yet neither will be in your 23 for Saturday.
Well taken try but if you think either or both should be in the 2nd Test 23 you need your head read.
Laidlaw no. Seymour yes.
I have Scottish blood. It's in my nature to be antagonistic and angry.
Get Davies on FFS.
Is 23-7 enough of a buffer boyo?
Not when Laidlaw throws away possession and kicks so shitly
Laidlaw is #rugbyjesus
.....according to a Scots rugby forum I follow.
Mind you some of them thought 10 Scots would tour so this may be slightly over optimistic.
Comedy Gold 👏 😂
Yep some serious shit talking. Apparently Barclay, Watson and Wilson were hard done by.
I do agree one or both Grays would have been great tourist though.
-
@taniwharugby With that forward pack, and no Beauden Barrett and TJP, they are pretty, pretty average.
-
The reffing of that last maul was a joke. The canes were average, but they were taken down by players coming around the side that the ref fucking called out.
-
@Crazy-Horse said in Hurricanes v B&I Lions:
@Nepia said in Hurricanes v B&I Lions:
Why would the Canes go for a driving maul with their backs?
Because NZ backs have been shithouse dealing with the rush defence?
If only the players and coaching staff had an example of how to deal with the rush defence favoured by Gatland.
-
Best, Henderson, Lawes, Tipuric and Stander going well.
Biggar solid, North looking like he's interested at least.
Well taken try from Seymour.
Halfpenny showing why he was in the 1st Test 23.
Can he be considered for the 2nd Test after playing 70 mins?
Nowell trying too hard.
Joseph annonymous. Where has his form gone?
Laidlaw, get him off.
-
That second Lions try looks dodgy on the replay, the player who caught the ball kept advancing despite being in front of the kick.
Considering we've recently seen a penalty for a player advancing on a kick when the ball when straight out they can consider themselves lucky.
-
I have just paused the replay of the Lions try from the intercept, maybe it is the camera angles but they look suspiciously offside.
-
@MiketheSnow said in Hurricanes v B&I Lions:
Best, Henderson, Lawes, Tipuric and Stander going well.
Biggar solid, North looking like he's interested at least.
Well taken try from Seymour.
Halfpenny showing why he was in the 1st Test 23.
Can he be considered for the 2nd Test after playing 70 mins?
Nowell trying too hard.
Joseph annonymous. Where has his form gone?
Laidlaw, get him off.
Heard you the first time. Davies isn't exactly #rugbyjesus.....could you actually be any more Welsh?
-
@Tim said in Hurricanes v B&I Lions:
@taniwharugby With that forward pack, and no Beauden Barrett and TJP, they are pretty, pretty average.
Yep, back to the canes of old!
-
@Crazy-Horse said in Hurricanes v B&I Lions:
I have just paused the replay of the Lions try from the intercept, maybe it is the camera angles but they look suspiciously offside.
You needed to pause?
