• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Super Rugby News

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
5.2k Posts 139 Posters 1.4m Views
Super Rugby News
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #1581

    MN5 bored by modern rugby in shock revelation.

    MN5M antipodeanA 2 Replies Last reply
    4
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #1582

    @Bones said in Super Rugby News:

    MN5 bored by modern rugby in shock revelation.

    Yep. More to my life than growing rats tails and watching rugby first thing in the morning bro.

    But I'm not the only one as the hordes of people choosing the couch over flat warm shit beer and stodgy overpriced food will attest.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #1583

    @Bones said in Super Rugby News:

    MN5 bored by modern rugby in shock revelation.

    Anything after 1999 5N?

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #1584

    @MN5 fucken whirrrrrrrrr!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #1585

    @antipodean said in Super Rugby News:

    @Bones said in Super Rugby News:

    MN5 bored by modern rugby in shock revelation.

    Anything after 1999 5N?

    1. They lost a game in 1999.
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • jeggaJ Offline
    jeggaJ Offline
    jegga
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #1586

    @antipodean said in Super Rugby News:

    @Stargazer said in Super Rugby News:

    Hilarious:

    It seems they need reminding about their behaviour over the years. Of course, you can join our competition ARU, as a thank you for voting for us to host the 2011 RWC.

    I can imagine the conversation, " here , we've poured you a big warm cup of go fuck yourselves. Drink up , there's plenty more where that came from ".

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
    #1587

    according to the news, Aus are still hopeful they can get a trans- Ta$man comp going...maybe a 2nd tier comp like the old CANZ Series would work...

    Aus are in a dark place right now, little to no bargaining power...also heard the ARU had pumped $30 mill into Super rugby since the expansion foresaking grass roots.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MokeyM Offline
    MokeyM Offline
    Mokey
    wrote on last edited by
    #1588

    I don't know what the reasoning behind the expansion of Aus teams was, whether it was greed or just plain arrogance, but it was massively flawed. They never had the player numbers or feeder systems in place to support five Super-level teams.

    The only way you have strong Super rugby, is by having strong club rugby, then strong provincial rugby. It doesn't matter how much cash you pump into Super, if it is built on a house of cards, the threat of collapse was always just a puff of wind away.

    NZ rugby is strong because it is built on rock solid feeder systems with strong community support. Again, another issue with Aussie rugby. You can't just say, hey state, this is your team YOU WILL LOVE AND SUPPORT THEM. The public will quite rightly say 'who are these guys? What are their credentials? What connection between me and them is there' - eg same club, same town, same school, same Uni, whatever. No connection = superficial support, at best. And they won't stand by you in bad times. It's a lot harder to hate on someone you think could be a mate. But a glossed up show pony who drifts in, plays, then is whisked away? Easiest thing in the world.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #1589

    @Stargazer Still a few debutants who haven't had a run and there won't be any easier games to give them a few minutes...but, I definitely agree on banana skins.

    The Bulls found that out! 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by Stargazer
    #1590

    Barrett free to play after red card

    Editor  /  Apr 10, 2017  /  Uncategorized

    Barrett free to play after red card

    Barrett free to play after red card

    Hurricanes and New Zealand fly-half Beauden Barrett is free to play after a hearing looked into his red card against the Waratahs.

    Hurricanes and New Zealand fly-half Beauden Barrett is free to play after a hearing looked into his red card against the Waratahs.
    
    A SANZAAR Judicial Committee Hearing has found Barrett of the Hurricanes guilty of contravening Law 10.2(a) Intentionally Offending after he received two Yellow Cards for deliberate knockdowns and was subsequently issued with a Red Card during a Super Rugby match at the weekend.
    
    No further sanction has been imposed on the player.
    
    Barrett received two yellow cards in which he is alleged to have contravened Law 10.4(a) Intentionally Offending during the match between the Hurricanes v Waratahs at Westpac Stadium, Wellington on April 7.
    
    The SANZAAR Judicial Hearing held via video conference on Monday, April 10 was heard by Adam Casselden SC (Chairman), Mike Mika and De Wet Barry.
    
    In his finding, the Judicial Committee Chairman Adam Casselden SC ruled the following: “The Judicial Committee conducted a detailed review of all the available evidence, including all camera angles, and additional evidence from the player and submissions from his legal representative, Aaron Lloyd.
    
    “With respect to sanction the Judicial Committee ruled, after considering a number of factors, including the Player’s exemplary disciplinary record, that the Player’s ordering off merited no further sanction.
    
    “The player is therefore free to play and will serve no suspension”
    
    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • SammyCS Offline
    SammyCS Offline
    SammyC
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #1591

    @Chris-B. said in Super Rugby News:

    @taniwharugby Should have been an opportunity to give a few guys a week off from training and what not to completely freshen up. I'd imagine there will be several objectives in the Sunwolves' game - reintegrating the injured, resting a few who've had heavy workloads, maybe giving a few debutants a chance - and winning with a bonus point.

    Don't forget that one Razor! 🙂

    Ran into a few of them at the local pub on the west coast this weekend. They'd all been great given a few days off training.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #1592

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/91399425/aru-brumbies-will-not-be-axed-from-super-rugby

    The Force are not going quietly and have brought in the lawyers.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • jeggaJ Offline
    jeggaJ Offline
    jegga
    wrote on last edited by
    #1593

    Great, the ARU gets to blow more money fighting the Force in court.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #1594

    If the reports are true, giving a bunch of cash to the owners of the Rebels may just be the best idea.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    wrote on last edited by
    #1595

    ARU own the Force ...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.
    replied to jegga on last edited by
    #1596

    @jegga They'll be wishing they called them the Anchors after all.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #1597

    Alan Jones made a valid point this morning...the ARU has allowed SANZAAR to make them ditch a team, while retaining the Sunwolves...Aus have the ability to veto this as well apparently.

    I don't think there is any doubt Aus need to cull one team, but what happens from now going forward will be interesting.

    mariner4lifeM boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #1598

    @taniwharugby all reports i have read say that the ARU actually want to cull a team, it's their decision, they simply can't afford the 5.

    They aren't being pushed by SANZAAR, the NZRU aren't bullying them, the need to cut their costs, and that means one team needs to go. Of course the narrative on social media is very different.

    The fact it's a decision made by the ARU will make it even more messy if the Force (or the Rebels) and the players union decide to get militant.

    taniwharugbyT boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #1599

    @mariner4life oh I agree, was just an interesting point by Jones, who obviously was looking inward...despite calling for heads last week as well.

    Puts them in a tough place, they need more teams, but simply cannot sustain them.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #1600

    The reality is the Force, now owned by the ARU, is costing them the most money. Now that the broadcast partner (FoxSports) has said they'll continue giving the same money for less product, the extra TV timeslot means nothing.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Super Rugby News
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.