• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Six Nations 2017

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
778 Posts 59 Posters 151.0k Views
Six Nations 2017
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Derm McCrum on last edited by
    #461

    @Pot-Hale said in Six Nations 2017:

    Did Eddie Jones really say last week that England plan to put a cricket score on Italy?

    No, he just invited Alistair Cook to training

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Derm McCrum on last edited by
    #462

    @Pot-Hale said in Six Nations 2017:

    Did Eddie Jones really say last week that England plan to put a cricket score on Italy?

    Still, what fucks me off is that these terrible games they have don't result in a loss.

    F 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #463

    Flatman you mong. "I don't think you can go at the ball feet first if it's in the field of play"

    What?

    KruseK 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KruseK Offline
    KruseK Offline
    Kruse
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #464

    @Bones said in Six Nations 2017:

    Flatman you mong. "I don't think you can go at the ball feet first if it's in the field of play"

    What?

    Haven't you heard? in an attempt to differentiate rugby from soccer, they're banning kicking.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #465

    That was the ugliest execution of a 5 man overlap I've ever seen.

    How has this side won so many games in a row?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #466

    22-15, still in range

    9 minutes to go

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #467

    Now they stroll one in after Italy go to sleep. That's the game

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #468

    29-15

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KruseK Offline
    KruseK Offline
    Kruse
    wrote on last edited by
    #469

    And another... optimistic hat... the english will look at the scoreline, forget they were terrible, not learn any lessons (like reading the laws)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #470

    England a different side with George on instead on Hartley.

    A last minute try to blow the score out to something that doesn't reflect how well Italy played/how poor England were

    36-15

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #471

    I wonder if Gatland will take Hartley to NZ?

    To 'drop' him before Eddie does would be disruptive to the team feeling from the England squad members so he's kind of stuck with taking him isn't he?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Frye
    replied to Crucial on last edited by Frye
    #472

    @Crucial said in Six Nations 2017:

    @Pot-Hale said in Six Nations 2017:

    Did Eddie Jones really say last week that England plan to put a cricket score on Italy?

    Still, what fucks me off is that these terrible games they have don't result in a loss.

    I take solace in knowing that the Lions are going to get pumped in NZ.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derm McCrum
    wrote on last edited by
    #473

    Even 36-15 is not a cricket score.

    What's more relevant is the question - would Georgia have managed to play a test like that against England since the world and its mother seems to think they should be playing in the 6/7 Nations with/without relegation?

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Derm McCrum on last edited by
    #474

    @Pot-Hale said in Six Nations 2017:

    Even 36-15 is not a cricket score.

    What's more relevant is the question - would Georgia have managed to play a test like that against England since the world and its mother seems to think they should be playing in the 6/7 Nations with/without relegation?

    Not sure? Who is their coach at the moment. Conor O'Shea sure had a shit eating grin on his face for picking a tactic that Eddie hadn't thought of.
    Maybe it was his inside knowledge that the England players didn't study the laws

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derm McCrum
    wrote on last edited by
    #475

    If Italy had managed to keep the scoreline close until half-time, it would have been even more effective if they'd adopted the no-contest ruck tactic only in the second half.

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Disgusted of TW
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #476

    @Crucial What ruck, though? My recollection is that the ref had already explicitly stated that there was "tackle only" at that particular breakdown. Not saying it wasn't a penalty, but logically Itoje's can't have been a ruck offence.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Disgusted of TW
    replied to Derm McCrum on last edited by
    #477

    @Pot-Hale But without using it in first half, I doubt the halftime score would have been close (even with OF's bad kicking day), so it was only going to work for them as a Plan A. I'd guess even with presumed inside knowledge of English player IQs, the Italian coaching team can't have believed how well their tactics worked. Even when it looked like England had worked out how to counter the no-ruck, they didn't do so consistently, which was disappointing.

    But, they won, and hopefully will have learned from such a hastening experience. Even Hartley and Haskell (maybe...)

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Disgusted of TW on last edited by
    #478

    @Disgusted-of-TW said in Six Nations 2017:

    @Crucial What ruck, though? My recollection is that the ref had already explicitly stated that there was "tackle only" at that particular breakdown. Not saying it wasn't a penalty, but logically Itoje's can't have been a ruck offence.

    Didn’t see it but you can't play thecball when off your feet. Ruck or tackle.

    F D 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Frye
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #479

    @booboo said in Six Nations 2017:

    @Disgusted-of-TW said in Six Nations 2017:

    @Crucial What ruck, though? My recollection is that the ref had already explicitly stated that there was "tackle only" at that particular breakdown. Not saying it wasn't a penalty, but logically Itoje's can't have been a ruck offence.

    Didn’t see it but you can't play thecball when off your feet. Ruck or tackle.

    Or general play.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Disgusted of TW
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #480

    @booboo and @Frye. Yes, indeed. It was general dumb, not specific dumb. Ah well, onwards and upwards. I just hope that the Scots don't take a leaf out of the Italian book and try anything sneaky, like, you know, playing to the laws of the game.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

Six Nations 2017
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.