• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Australia v NZ - CH Series I

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
169 Posts 30 Posters 24.5k Views
Australia v NZ - CH Series I
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MokeyM Offline
    MokeyM Offline
    Mokey
    wrote on last edited by
    #88

    Pretty shit bowling effort actually. A lot of dropped catches, but worse was the actual bowling. Ferguson being wayward I pass cos he was on debut, but Henry 2/74, and Neesham 2/58 off 6 were way, way too expensive. 325 will be a very tough score to run down, a number of guys will need to step up big time.

    Latham bowled Hazelwood for 2. Not a great start.

    H 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by
    #89

    Just seen the Aussie wickets montage. Christ.

    I think I'd rather get excited about scrum penalties.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    replied to Mokey on last edited by
    #90

    @Mokey said in Australia v NZ - CH Series I:

    Pretty shit bowling effort actually. A lot of dropped catches, but worse was the actual bowling. Ferguson being wayward I pass cos he was on debut, but Henry 2/74, and Neesham 2/58 off 6 were way, way too expensive. 325 will be a very tough score to run down, a number of guys will need to step up big time.

    Latham bowled Hazelwood for 2. Not a great start.

    Neesham bowled his first 4 overs for 24. The only reason Neesham had to come back for two more was because Ferguson was hit out of the attack and Williamson only got 9 overs out of Santner. Neesham is always going to get tonked if he has to bowl there. Colin de Grandhomme ends up with good figures but his figures would probably be as bad or worse than Neesham's if he had to bowl at the death. Henry looked dangerous early but was poor late on.

    Our strategy when B Mac was captain was to bowl our strike bowler (Boult) out upfront. I think Henry should perhaps be the one to do that role for us. McClenaghan and Anderson are good death bowlers but both are currently injured. I think Williamson shouldn't have left Boult to bowl 4 of the last ten overs. I think we needed him to get another 2 over spell there in the middle. I suppose he didn't feel confident doing that because then it would be Henry/Neesham/Ferguson to bowl more at the death.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Online
    NTAN Online
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #91

    Unnecessary shot from Williamson

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Online
    No QuarterN Online
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #92

    Now Kane goes. Our sloggers are going to have to come off big time.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #93

    We are poke

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    wrote on last edited by
    #94

    Neesham should not be a number 4. He's a 6 at best.

    H 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CanerbryC Offline
    CanerbryC Offline
    Canerbry
    wrote on last edited by
    #95

    To win this, Guptill needs to carry his bat and beat Smith's score at a better clip.

    Easy.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    replied to Damo on last edited by
    #96

    @Damo said in Australia v NZ - CH Series I:

    Neesham should not be a number 4. He's a 6 at best.

    Then Munro probably has to be at 4 - unless you want Nicholls.

    DamoD L 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by Damo
    #97

    @hydro11 no. I want some better players. I'm lamenting our options not criticizing the decision

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    LABCAT
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by
    #98

    @hydro11 said in Australia v NZ - CH Series I:

    @Damo said in Australia v NZ - CH Series I:

    Neesham should not be a number 4. He's a 6 at best.

    Then Munro probably has to be at 4 - unless you want Nicholls.

    Munro should definitely be at four. He is playing as specialist batsmen, Neesham is the bowling allrounder and should be batting at six.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #99

    There is no way we can win this game

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    wrote on last edited by
    #100

    I think we can win this but this partnership needs to stick together.

    No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Online
    No QuarterN Online
    No Quarter
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by
    #101

    @hydro11 said in Australia v NZ - CH Series I:

    I think we can win this but this partnership needs to stick together.

    There is no way we can win this game.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #102

    @No-Quarter said in Australia v NZ - CH Series I:

    @hydro11 said in Australia v NZ - CH Series I:

    I think we can win this but this partnership needs to stick together.

    There is no way we can win this game.

    The mountain is too far to climb

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    wrote on last edited by
    #103

    We are currently at $5.75 to win. It's tough but doable.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    wrote on last edited by
    #104

    $4.75 all of a sudden.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by
    #105

    @hydro11 said in Australia v NZ - CH Series I:

    We are currently at $5.75 to win. It's tough but doable.

    No way hydro. Stick a fork in us we're done

    CanerbryC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CanerbryC Offline
    CanerbryC Offline
    Canerbry
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #106

    @canefan said in Australia v NZ - CH Series I:

    @hydro11 said in Australia v NZ - CH Series I:

    We are currently at $5.75 to win. It's tough but doable.

    No way hydro. Stick a fork in us we're done

    Dunno, Guptill's ahead of Smith's clip...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #107

    Mods please lock out anyone who thinks we can win this game

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

Australia v NZ - CH Series I
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.