All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.
-
@Stargazer said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:
@Donsteppa To replace who? Because it's too early to take Todd off. Read?
Either. Why too early for Todd?
-
@hydro11 said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:
@Sapetyvi said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:
Savea was never going to run Speight down. Fucking fuck.
Why is that relevant?
Materiality? That little push changed nothing, but overruling the try might have changed a lot. It might be a 'right call' to the letter of the law but certainly over officitiating
-
@Sapetyvi said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:
@hydro11 said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:
@Sapetyvi said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:
Savea was never going to run Speight down. Fucking fuck.
Why is that relevant?
Materiality? That little push changed nothing, but overruling the try might have changed a lot. It might be a 'right call' to the letter of the law but certainly over officitiating
Off the ball stuff is often immaterial but results in penalties.
-
@hydro11 said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:
@Sapetyvi said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:
@hydro11 said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:
@Sapetyvi said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:
Savea was never going to run Speight down. Fucking fuck.
Why is that relevant?
Materiality? That little push changed nothing, but overruling the try might have changed a lot. It might be a 'right call' to the letter of the law but certainly over officitiating
Off the ball stuff is often immaterial but results in penalties.
So you are saying that if that that little push happened in half way behind a ruck, it would have been a penalty?
It was a shit decision by Nige and the TMO in my opinion, you think it wasn't and neither of us is going to change our minds so lets MOVE on.
Edited