SF Crusaders v Blues
-
@Mattasaurus said in SF Crusaders v Blues:
incoming repeated Saders infringements in the 22 and warnings
It's kinda clever how they do a big angled press from the outside so the main tackler can fold around the back, but at test level it's penalty central. Blues dealing with it well.
-
Red Card
-
Yeah direct head contact, no obvious mitigation, will be lucky not to see red
-
@No-Quarter said in SF Crusaders v Blues:
Yeah direct head contact, no obvious mitigation, will be lucky not to see red
clear reduction of height... but definitely a YC
-
Unfortunately, HS needs to go off for an HIA
Is Ennor able to do his HIA protocols while on a YC?
-
@Mattasaurus said in SF Crusaders v Blues:
@No-Quarter said in SF Crusaders v Blues:
Yeah direct head contact, no obvious mitigation, will be lucky not to see red
clear reduction of height... but definitely a YC
Not a sudden reduction of height though
-
@NTA said in SF Crusaders v Blues:
@nzzp said in SF Crusaders v Blues:
by the laws, that's a red these days.
Prediction: it'll stay yellow because Sotutu dipped 2.6mm right before contact.
Prediction based on this prediction: non-Crusaders well be outraged when this happens
-
@nzzp said in SF Crusaders v Blues:
by the laws, that's a red these days.
If that's not a 20min RC, then nothing in the tackle area should be.
-
@NTA said in SF Crusaders v Blues:
@NTA said in SF Crusaders v Blues:
@nzzp said in SF Crusaders v Blues:
by the laws, that's a red these days.
Prediction: it'll stay yellow because Sotutu dipped 2.6mm right before contact.
Prediction based on this prediction: non-Crusaders well be outraged when this happens
if you are surprise by card lotteiries, you dn't watch much rugby