• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

AB Blindside - past, present & future

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
110 Posts 28 Posters 1.3k Views
AB Blindside - past, present & future
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to Mauss last edited by voodoo
    #6

    Damn it @Mauss I was just about to post the exact same thing 😔

    1 Reply Last reply
    23
  • MaussM Offline
    MaussM Offline
    Mauss
    replied to canefan last edited by
    #7

    @canefan said in AB Blindside - past, present & future:

    But I might need to feed it into chat gpt for a summary in 100 words or less...

    Yeah, I went a bit over the top with the word count. I suppose the summary is:

    (1) Poor planning and future-proofing by AB selectors after Kaino
    (2) Too many variables in selectors' demands of the position
    (3) If divided into tight and loose blindside candidates, plenty of options in NZ
    (4) Proper blindside: combination of tight five grunt work and number 8 soft skills
    (5) Interesting option for 2025: Simon Parker.

    That's, I think, the gist of it.

    canefanC nostrildamusN 2 Replies Last reply
    12
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Mauss last edited by
    #8

    @Mauss said in AB Blindside - past, present & future:

    @canefan said in AB Blindside - past, present & future:

    But I might need to feed it into chat gpt for a summary in 100 words or less...

    Yeah, I went a bit over the top with the word count. I suppose the summary is:

    (1) Poor planning and future-proofing by AB selectors after Kaino
    (2) Too many variables in selectors' demands of the position
    (3) If divided into tight and loose blindside candidates, plenty of options in NZ
    (4) Proper blindside: combination of tight five grunt work and number 8 soft skills
    (5) Interesting option for 2025: Simon Parker.

    That's, I think, the gist of it.

    The selectors and coaches should eat a large slice of blame pie. Lack of leadership starts at the top, and without direction and good communication, how can they expect the players to perform in the way they want?

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • nostrildamusN Online
    nostrildamusN Online
    nostrildamus
    replied to Mauss last edited by
    #9

    @Mauss said in AB Blindside - past, present & future:

    @canefan said in AB Blindside - past, present & future:

    But I might need to feed it into chat gpt for a summary in 100 words or less...

    Yeah, I went a bit over the top with the word count. I suppose the summary is:

    (1) Poor planning and future-proofing by AB selectors after Kaino
    (2) Too many variables in selectors' demands of the position
    (3) If divided into tight and loose blindside candidates, plenty of options in NZ
    (4) Proper blindside: combination of tight five grunt work and number 8 soft skills
    (5) Interesting option for 2025: Simon Parker.

    That's, I think, the gist of it.

    I have to ask, though, isn't there the potential factor that they couldn't replace Kaino because no one was consistent enough (or, potentially, flexible enough?)

    MaussM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MaussM Offline
    MaussM Offline
    Mauss
    replied to nostrildamus last edited by Mauss
    #10

    @nostrildamus said in AB Blindside - past, present & future:

    I have to ask, though, isn't there the potential factor that they couldn't replace Kaino because no one was consistent enough (or, potentially, flexible enough?)

    To me, part of the issue, if we’re talking about the situation immediately after Kaino’s departure (late 2017-’19), is that, in the selectors' eyes, they had already identified the perfect replacement in Squire.

    The problem, of course, is that Squire suffered from injuries as well as his own personal struggles. The fact that they selected, in his absence, (1) a player who plays in a completely different manner (Fifita) and (2) a player who was very raw at the time (Frizell), tells me that they never considered that Squire might not make the World Cup.

    So the question – were there no players available? – becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy, as they didn't test the players which could've potentially done a job. To me, there were players in Super Rugby at the time – Brad Shields, Taleni Seu, Akira Ioane – who, at least, mirrored certain aspects of Squire’s play more than someone like Fifita did. So the selectors' mistake, to me, is their overconfidence that Squire would come right and their inability to plan for a scenario where he doesn’t make it.

    It’s how you end up in a semi-final of a World Cup with a completely makeshift loose forward trio, which then gets badly outplayed by their opposites.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Mauss last edited by canefan
    #11

    @Mauss said in AB Blindside - past, present & future:

    @nostrildamus said in AB Blindside - past, present & future:

    I have to ask, though, isn't there the potential factor that they couldn't replace Kaino because no one was consistent enough (or, potentially, flexible enough?)

    To me, part of the issue, if we’re talking about the situation immediately after Kaino’s departure (late 2017-’19), is that, in the selectors' eyes, they had already identified the perfect replacement in Squire.

    The problem, of course, is that Squire suffered from injuries as well as his own personal struggles. The fact that they selected, in his absence, (1) a player who plays in a completely different manner (Fifita) and (2) a player who was very raw at the time (Frizell), tells me that they never considered that Squire might not make the World Cup.

    So the question – were there no players available? – becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy, as they didn't test the players which could've potentially done a job. To me, there were players in Super Rugby at the time – Brad Shields, Taleni Seu, Akira Ioane – who, at least, mirrored certain aspects of Squire’s play more than someone like Fifita did. So the selectors' mistake, to me, is their overconfidence that Squire would come right and their inability to plan for a scenario where he doesn’t make it.

    It’s how you end up in a semi-final of a World Cup with a completely makeshift loose forward trio, which then gets badly outplayed by their opposites.

    This is the selection strategy of Fozzie and Razor (to date) in a nutshell. Either don't give players a fair go to see if they can actually make a valuable contribution (the game in Dunedin where Fozzie made wholesale changes springs to mins), or give them a few garbage minutes as lip service (Plummer, Stevenson) and cast them aside. I won't hold my breath waiting to see if Razor can select the best of our promising talent (not just from the area around Nelson and the Port Hills) an molding them into a formidable team with a clear game plan. Although this is exactly what I hoped he would do based on his apparent reputation

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    brodean
    wrote last edited by brodean
    #12

    Fifita seemed to lose favour because he was playing lock at the Canes. When he played lock he was a tighter player than Squire. And despite Fifitas comments around contact he was a very physical player.

    I'm not sold on the categorisations of loose and tight. It's not so black and white.

    For example Akira Ioane played it tight last year. Players tend to play as they're asked to by the coaches. Vern wanted Akira to play tighter and he did.

    A MaussM MN5M 3 Replies Last reply
    3
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    African Monkey
    replied to brodean last edited by
    #13

    @brodean said in AB Blindside - past, present & future:

    Fifita seemed to lose favour because he was playing lock at the Canes. When he played lock he was a tighter player than Squire. And despite Fifitas comments around contact he was a very physical player.

    I'm not sold on the categorisations of loose and tight. It's not so black and white.

    For example Akira Ioane played it tight last year. Players tend to play as they're asked to by the coaches. Vern wanted Akira to play tighter and he did.

    That and Akira losing a bit of athleticism in his older years forced him to play closer last season.

    Obviously something went on behind the scenes and I'm rewriting history here, but how on earth did Akira Ioane not get a go before the 2019 world cup? Hansen really knew how to hold a grudge especially with some of the bizarre selections before him (Luke Whitelock and Gareth Evans spring to mind). Hansen really began to run that team into the ground from the loss to Ireland in 2016 onwards.

    Almost as bizarre as seeing Liam Squire playing so many tests. I don't think he was ever the answer and went missing in big tests once he was getting beaten up physically (Ireland 2018 springs to mind before he went off). Not saying Simon Parker is gonna follow the same fate, but his play is similar to Liam Squire, similar with Finau and Vaea Fifita (Finau Is better thought).

    Another guy that wasn't taken into consideration and was treated poorly by Hansen was Steven Luatua. He really started to shine, but Hansen treated him like a prick, received bugger all feedback after being shamed in public in 2014, was the form 6 in 2017 but had already signed overseas by then and part of that was because of Hansen's poor man management towards him and sure enough, once Luatua signed overseas, Hansen had a big whinge about it.

    It's taken a few years to recover from Hansen's disastrous last 2-3 years in charge and the 6 spot was one of them.

    1 Reply Last reply
    10
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    wrote last edited by
    #14

    There’s this kid Parker that might be worth having a look at

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MaussM Offline
    MaussM Offline
    Mauss
    replied to brodean last edited by
    #15

    @brodean said in AB Blindside - past, present & future:

    Players tend to play as they're asked to by the coaches.

    Well, they'll certainly try. Every player wants, to a certain point, show their coaches that they can deliver what is asked of them.

    But there's also such a thing as ingrained habits. Players have instincts which they've cultivated over years of playing the game. And it becomes exponentially harder to suppress those instincts the higher up the game you go, as the pressure increases and your window to process things becomes smaller and smaller.

    At least, that's how I think of those things. It just makes sense to me. Perhaps you'll go out there and try to play exactly like your coach has told you to. But when there's 50.000 people around you and an angry Afrikaaner is coming at you at a 100 miles an hour, those instincts tend to kick in pretty quickly.

    M B 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • M Online
    M Online
    Mr Fish
    replied to Mauss last edited by
    #16

    @Mauss said in AB Blindside - past, present & future:

    @brodean said in AB Blindside - past, present & future:

    Players tend to play as they're asked to by the coaches.

    Well, they'll certainly try. Every player wants, to a certain point, show their coaches that they can deliver what is asked of them.

    But there's also such a thing as ingrained habits. Players have instincts which they've cultivated over years of playing the game. And it becomes exponentially harder to suppress those instincts the higher up the game you go, as the pressure increases and your window to process things becomes smaller and smaller.

    At least, that's how I think of those things. It just makes sense to me. Perhaps you'll go out there and try to play exactly like your coach has told you to. But when there's 50.000 people around you and an angry Afrikaaner is coming at you at a 100 miles an hour, those instincts tend to kick in pretty quickly.

    I dunno, it feels like a lot of it just comes down to where you stand on the field. If you're near the breakdown, you're going to be carrying into contact. If you're parked out on the wings, you're going to be running in the open field more. It's very hard to be an 'open' player if you're hitting the ball up in the middle of the field.

    MaussM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MaussM Offline
    MaussM Offline
    Mauss
    replied to Mr Fish last edited by
    #17

    @Mr-Fish said in AB Blindside - past, present & future:

    I dunno, it feels like a lot of it just comes down to where you stand on the field. If you're near the breakdown, you're going to be carrying into contact. If you're parked out on the wings, you're going to be running in the open field more. It's very hard to be an 'open' player if you're hitting the ball up in the middle of the field.

    But the question is, how did they end up there, at that particular place on the field? And that does make a big difference. I think there’s three aspects to this: team structure from set-piece, individual decision-making and then, what I’d call, instinctive drift in multi-phase.

    Most players end up in positions where they’re supposed to be from something like lineout or scrum attack. So your six might be tasked with clearing a ruck blindside before folding back to the open. That’s just structure.

    Then there’s recognition of opportunities by the players themselves on the field. Someone like Finau is a good example of this: he’s constantly calling to space, running improvised lines or creating his own ‘pod’ on the fly. He does seem to play with a lot of freedom at the Chiefs, so he ends up in different places, a lot of it seemingly by his own design.

    And finally, as the phases stack up in open play and structure slowly disappears, players are constantly realigning in either attack or defence. And then you see very different patterns with certain players. Some players never move far away from the source, preferring to play close to the ball. Others will naturally drift to the edge, because they’re more comfortable there. That resembles something like instinct.

    So the combination of those three factors – structure, individual decision-making and drift – usually make the difference to me between a player who prefers to play tight and someone who prefers to play wider. Again, that’s just how I see it. I’d also understand if this seems like I’m overthinking things, which wouldn’t be the first time.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Mauss last edited by
    #18

    @Mauss yep and a good attack structure will see some of those and try to manipulate certain players to get in areas they shouldn't to upset the defence by forcing other players into unplanned areas.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote last edited by Tim
    #19

    Related to the discussion, though Elliot Smith generally seems to be completely full of shit (and most of his articles have no relation to reality):

    Super Rugby, Rugby, Sport

    Elliott Smith: The ABs selection questions hanging over Super Rugby playoffs

    Elliott Smith: The ABs selection questions hanging over Super Rugby playoffs

    OPINION: Some All Blacks hopefuls are sidelined as their teams missed the playoffs.

    There’s recent precedent for the playoffs helping to clear up tight selections for the All Blacks coaches, with Wallace Sititi’s wrecking-ball performance against the Hurricanes in last year’s semifinal for the Chiefs helping to earn him a spot.

    Akira Ioane and Hoskins Sotutu had a line drawn through their names as the Blues pack was torn to shreds by the Crusaders the previous season, with then All Blacks coach Ian Foster admitting their performances that night had made up the selectors’ minds.

    IIRC, Ioane was just returning from a Lisfranc injury.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    brodean
    replied to Mauss last edited by
    #20

    @Mauss said in AB Blindside - past, present & future:

    @brodean said in AB Blindside - past, present & future:

    Players tend to play as they're asked to by the coaches.

    Well, they'll certainly try. Every player wants, to a certain point, show their coaches that they can deliver what is asked of them.

    But there's also such a thing as ingrained habits. Players have instincts which they've cultivated over years of playing the game. And it becomes exponentially harder to suppress those instincts the higher up the game you go, as the pressure increases and your window to process things becomes smaller and smaller.

    At least, that's how I think of those things. It just makes sense to me. Perhaps you'll go out there and try to play exactly like your coach has told you to. But when there's 50.000 people around you and an angry Afrikaaner is coming at you at a 100 miles an hour, those instincts tend to kick in pretty quickly.

    There is ingrained habits but your post assumes too much of the players. Macdonald and Foster wanted to play wider games and Akira Ioane obliged. When Vern came along and wanted to keep it close Akira Ioane immediately followed the game pattern and stuck to it all year. So in the case of Akira Ioane I think it shows that clearly they were not ingrained habits.

    Also Fifita when he went back to lock for the Canes played a very tight game and was one of the most physical players in the comp. He was also one of the most physical players in the stodgy NH.

    MaussM 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    brodean
    wrote last edited by brodean
    #21

    In terms of Parker I saw him as a potential AB last year however I do think that if Blackadder is fit he is likely to be in the squad as the starting 6 with Savea at 7 and Sititi at 8. Jason Ryan loves him some Blackadder and I can't see him looking past him. Personally I'd like to see someone like Parker in the squad over Blackadder but I'll be shocked if it happens.

    Haig hasn't had a lot of game time this year. I do think there is a place for Finau and Parker in the squad.

    I don't see Razor and co going for a tight 6 under their game plan. They picked Blackadder, Finau, and Sititi as starters last year. They're looking for mobile guys.

    In terms of workrate Finau, Parker and Haig are very much alike compared to Blackadder. Finau is highly effective at attacking rucks and Parker in defensive rucks. With regards to Blackadder the coaches seem to be more interested in volume as opposed to actual impact. He's always been a high volume low impact guy.

    Contact Involvements per 80 Minutes Loose Forwards ( Carries + Tackles + Rucks )
    69.25 Ethan Blackadder
    61.62 Corey Kellow
    61.0 Tom Christie
    58.87 Dalton Papali'i
    58.51 Du'Plessis Kirifi
    58.41 Sean Withy
    56.02 Jahrome Brown
    54.84 Peter Lakai
    53.63 Ardie Savea
    52.35 Vaiolini Ekuasi
    52.17 Luke Jacobson
    50.6 Cullen Grace
    48.87 Christian Lio-Willie
    48.33 Brayden Iose
    47.89 Kaylum Boshier
    47.36 Hugh Renton
    45.14 Hoskins Sotutu
    44.21 Simon Parker
    42.27 Oliver Haig
    39.32 Samipeni Finau

    Top 20 Loose Forward Players by Rucks Per 80 minutes
    35.24 Dalton Papali'i
    35.19 Ethan Blackadder
    33.57 Sean Withy
    31.78 Corey Kellow
    31.4 Du'Plessis Kirifi
    29.68 Tom Christie
    29.13 Jahrome Brown
    27.87 Ardie Savea
    26.91 Luke Jacobson
    25.77 Peter Lakai
    25.44 Kaylum Boshier
    23.85 Cullen Grace
    23.35 Simon Parker
    22.39 Vaiolini Ekuasi
    21.74 Oliver Haig
    20.72 Christian Lio-Willie
    20.28 Samipeni Finau
    20.0 Brayden Iose
    19.95 Hoskins Sotutu
    16.75 Hugh Renton

    Top 20 Loose Forward Players by Attacking Ruck Effectiveness
    91.8% Samipeni Finau
    91.3% Tom Christie
    90.2% Dalton Papali'i
    90.2% Vaiolini Ekuasi
    88.1% Ardie Savea
    87.8% Peter Lakai
    87.6% Jahrome Brown
    86.9% Christian Lio-Willie
    85.9% Hoskins Sotutu
    85.9% Du'Plessis Kirifi
    85.2% Brayden Iose
    85.1% Luke Jacobson
    85.0% Sean Withy
    84.5% Corey Kellow
    84.5% Oliver Haig
    83.1% Simon Parker
    82.6% Hugh Renton
    81.9% Cullen Grace
    81.5% Ethan Blackadder
    77.3% Kaylum Boshier

    Top 20 Loose Forward Players by Defensive Ruck Effectiveness
    29.6% Simon Parker
    23.9% Luke Jacobson
    23.1% Kaylum Boshier
    22.4% Du'Plessis Kirifi
    21.9% Samipeni Finau
    20.1% Ardie Savea
    17.6% Cullen Grace
    17.3% Dalton Papali'i
    16.1% Tom Christie
    15.2% Jahrome Brown
    14.8% Christian Lio-Willie
    14.7% Sean Withy
    13.1% Peter Lakai
    12.1% Hoskins Sotutu
    12.0% Corey Kellow
    11.8% Vaiolini Ekuasi
    9.1% Brayden Iose
    8.3% Hugh Renton
    7.4% Ethan Blackadder
    0.0% Oliver Haig

    Top 20 Loose Forward Players by Dominant Tackle %
    16.5% Simon Parker
    11.5% Samipeni Finau
    8.0% Hugh Renton
    7.9% Ardie Savea
    7.1% Brayden Iose
    6.2% Christian Lio-Willie
    6.0% Ethan Blackadder
    5.8% Hoskins Sotutu
    5.5% Peter Lakai
    5.3% Sean Withy
    4.4% Kaylum Boshier
    4.4% Corey Kellow
    4.3% Du'Plessis Kirifi
    4.2% Luke Jacobson
    3.5% Jahrome Brown
    3.4% Cullen Grace
    3.3% Tom Christie
    3.3% Dalton Papali'i
    2.0% Oliver Haig
    0.0% Vaiolini Ekuasi

    Stats from Opta theanalyst.

    MaussM nostrildamusN T 3 Replies Last reply
    6
  • nostrildamusN Online
    nostrildamusN Online
    nostrildamus
    wrote last edited by
    #22

    Interesting stats, EBs are even more impressive given he isn't that fast, it is not just Ryan but also Razor who loves him but apart from that do they consider how his injury rate affects the loosie combo?
    How is Parker in the lineout compared to Finau?
    I forgot about Luatua, he was good. Vito as a 6/8 (8/6) I also liked.

    B 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    wrote last edited by
    #23

    Finau and Blackadder are lower on tackle %age than the other contenders

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    brodean
    replied to nostrildamus last edited by
    #24

    @nostrildamus said in AB Blindside - past, present & future:

    do they consider how his injury rate affects the loosie combo?

    No. No they don't.

    That was pretty clear when they used tests last year to build Blackadder back into form.

    canefanC F 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to brodean last edited by
    #25

    @brodean said in AB Blindside - past, present & future:

    @nostrildamus said in AB Blindside - past, present & future:

    do they consider how his injury rate affects the loosie combo?

    No. No they don't.

    That was pretty clear when they used tests last year to build Blackadder back into form.

    Unless he ends up born again hard in the next year or so, I fear EB will end up stuffing our RWC cycle because of a failure of the coaches to see past him for the good of the team

    1 Reply Last reply
    2

AB Blindside - past, present & future
Sports Talk
allblacks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.