Australia v India
-
-
@KiwiMurph said in Australia v India:
@NTA said in Australia v India:
Mitch Marsh: specialist catcher.
What's the rules with 12th men fielders? Seriously he should be a fielding 12th man going forward
and put Marnus in the dugout... -
@KiwiMurph said in Australia v India:
Aus should get a dozen overs with the new ball (if they need them)
To be fair if they fail to take the wickets then for me it is all on Cummins, new ball has been crucial for both teams in the last two days. I would have had India batting earlier
-
@bayimports Yeah - late yesterday, I think Shastri said Lyon or Boland not getting out might actually be hurting Australia's chances.
Because I'm very conservative and from a different era, I wouldn't have had the balls to declare - but, I was surprised they didn't. Baz would've pulled the plug with an hour to go.
-
-
-
@KiwiMurph said in Australia v India:
That shows the limits of snicko
Snicko isn't perfect
But it is racist 😜
-
-
@Dan54 said in Australia v India:
Snicko isn't perfect, looked like ball deflected. Shows perhaps that Snicko shouldn't be used??
It was used perfectly there. It's part of the process not the be all and end all. Doesn't mean you should get rid of it
-
@KiwiMurph said in Australia v India:
@Dan54 said in Australia v India:
Snicko isn't perfect, looked like ball deflected. Shows perhaps that Snicko shouldn't be used??
It was used perfectly there. It's part of the process not the be all and end all. Doesn't mean you should get rid of it
Yep, whet I meant is when they use snicko to decide whether a batsman is out LBW. I not keen on all tech maybe, but it shows it still not perfect etc.
-
