@antipodean said in All Blacks 2025:
@KiwiMurph his PR skills might suck, in fact his entire tenure concerns me as to his capability to perform the role. But I find Hinton's article full of unfounded premises.
Where's the evidence that another Bledisloe Cup magically turns into a massive money spinner just because it's held on a certain date?
Why would SR clubs support a venture that takes away players during a competition when they could have an injury crisis?
If it requires a Test during SR to capture the attention of the rugby public, why aren't they addressing the problem with SR?
The fact Robinson appears to have consulted with stakeholders is the opposite of a "wave-of-the-hand type dismissal".
I have had similar thoughts.
We all now we moved away from having 3 tests with Aus a year due to over familiarity and interest dropping. I dont see why everyone will want it because it is held on anzac day.
Why dont they do something completely unique?
Have a super round on anzac weekend 4 aussie teams vs 4 kiwi teams in the same stadium. (Or saturday - 2 games in sudney/ sunday 2 games in Perth) and play for the Anzac cup. Country with the most wins in the weeknd, wins the cup.
Its unique, its country vs country for an additional prize in super rigby (bit like The triple crown in the 6 nstions)
This might sound daft but it took me 2 minutes to think of this and i prefer it over another bledisloe test