Australia v India
-
@Rapido said in Australia v India:
@booboo said in Australia v India:
@KiwiMurph said in Australia v India:
@Dan54 said in Australia v India:
Snicko isn't perfect, looked like ball deflected. Shows perhaps that Snicko shouldn't be used??
It was used perfectly there. It's part of the process not the be all and end all. Doesn't mean you should get rid of it
You can see small spikes from the ambient noise throughout the replay, one of which could easily have been the ball on bat. Mind you, those small spikes could have come from anywhere... (yes, I've still got the shits about the Llong-Lyon debacle and the over reliance on snicko ... that was proof snicko is unreliable in and of itself.)
IIRC the Llong 3rd umpiring debacle decision was a hot spot one, not snicko.
Edit. Actually. I guess that means there was no snick, but was a Hotspot. So yes, actually you're point is correct.
Yeah hotspot showed on all angles ("which coul1d have come from anywhere) (and Lyon gave himself up and was waiting by the boundary), but as nothing showed on snicko Llong convinced himself there was no noise.
Same principle here: obvious bat, no snicko.
-
-
-
-
@KiwiMurph said in Australia v India:
I just heard shrieks of joy from the Sydney suburbs where @NTA lives
