• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Highlanders v Crusaders

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
crusadershighlanders
249 Posts 44 Posters 28.3k Views
Highlanders v Crusaders
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #177

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Tim" data-cid="579492" data-time="1463131161">
    <div>
    <p>That's the first I've seen of Dagg this season. Not getting back in the All Blacks.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Disagree. His form since he's been back has been very good. He's been miles better than that 12 year old playing for the Chiefs.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SammyCS Offline
    SammyCS Offline
    SammyC
    wrote on last edited by
    #178

    Great game, as I said last week Joseph is an excellent coach.<br><br>
    From a crusaders perspective I'm not overly disappointed. Nadolo to come back, moody, Barrett and crotty to start ahead of Crockett, Romano and fonotia.<br><br>
    Thought Dagg was our best player, almost error free and a threat with ball in hand.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mattasaurus
    wrote on last edited by
    #179

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="ACT Crusader" data-cid="579497" data-time="1463131478"><p>Fantastic win for the Landers. Well done and congrats to Mattasauraus and SouthernMan. <br>
    Crotty needed to come on earlier to stop the pourous 10-12-13 defence.</p></blockquote>
    <br>
    Was stunned crotty didn't come on at half time....

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SammyCS Offline
    SammyCS Offline
    SammyC
    wrote on last edited by
    #180

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="antipodean" data-cid="579500" data-time="1463131509"><p>
    Disagree. His form since he's been back has been very good. He's been miles better than that 12 year old playing for the Chiefs.</p></blockquote>
    <br>
    He's been excellent tonight I thought

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • UncoU Offline
    UncoU Offline
    Unco
    wrote on last edited by
    #181

    <p>Great game. Consolation try at the end but at least it keeps the points difference down. Landers are still third in the NZ conference.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mattasaurus
    wrote on last edited by
    #182

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="SammyC" data-cid="579501" data-time="1463131532"><p>Great game, as I said last week Joseph is an excellent coach.<br>
    From a crusaders perspective I'm not overly disappointed. Nadolo to come back, moody, Barrett and crotty to start ahead of Crockett, Romano and fonotia.<br>
    Thought Dagg was our best player, almost error free and a threat with ball in hand.</p></blockquote>
    <br>
    And some very good kicking too

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Do not disturb
    ACT CrusaderA Do not disturb
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #183

    So Sader, Chiefs and Landers all on 37 points. Landers played one more game. Saders ahead on points diff. <br><br>
    Great stuff by the three teams.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #184

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="ACT Crusader" data-cid="579506" data-time="1463131795"><p>So Sader, Chiefs and Landers all on 37 points. Landers played one more game. Saders ahead on points diff. <br><br>
    Great stuff by the three teams.</p></blockquote>
    That Canes decision to "rest" players could potentially wreck their season now as they could end up being left behind.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #185

    <p>I watched the game with the alternative commentary (ref's mic) once I saw the Crusaders' cheerleaders were there.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Read - whinge, whinge, whinge.</p>
    <p>I thought Dixon was very good and will have done his AB chances no harm.</p>
    <p>Faddes looked like a world beater</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Very tight at the top of the NZ conference now.  These NZ derbies are so crucial.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    tubbyj
    wrote on last edited by
    #186

    <p>Dagg was good I thought. Only attacking threat. Missed Nadolo's physicality out wide, Macali too inexperienced and McNicol not really up to this level.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Missed Crotty in the centres.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Odd option taking as well. Things like Todd having a go at the line in close instead of Tafua then McNicol and Mongia doing so much kicking instead of passing it to Dagg.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #187

    Wow. L Whitelock and Faddes with the game of their lives. Crotty should have started - as should have Moody and Barrett - Toddy should cop some heat for that.<br><br>
    I think Dixon just played his way into the ABs. The Smiths, Sopoaga and Naholo were excellent. Fekitoa was ok but not that great.<br><br>
    For the biggest game of his career - Mo'ounga equipped himself very well.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    Rembrandt
    wrote on last edited by
    #188

    <p>Did Hohneck play? </p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stockcar86S Offline
    Stockcar86S Offline
    Stockcar86
    wrote on last edited by
    #189

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Rembrandt" data-cid="579513" data-time="1463132096">
    <div>
    <p>Did Hohneck play? </p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>Came on as sub with 15? minutes to go</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #190

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Stockcar86" data-cid="579515" data-time="1463132358">
    <div>
    <p>Came on as sub with 15? minutes to go</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>He started at LH.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    tubbyj
    wrote on last edited by
    #191

    <p>Don't want to criticize the ref but he is getting praised because he allowed a free flowing entertaining game not because he applied the laws of the game that well. He also allowed a shitload of off the ball stuff.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>You could certainly make a case that Read and Ellis had a fair bit to whinge about but I won't as it was a great game and good for the competition that the Highlanders won.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    SouthernMan
    wrote on last edited by
    #192

    What I found hilarious about Hohneck at loosehead was the fact we went down to golden oldies the other week, when he had to come on.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    SouthernMan
    wrote on last edited by
    #193

    What happens when you have a backline full of superstars, the opposition analyse the heck out of the world beaters and forget out Faddes. Worked out pretty well for us.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #194

    Not sure if this was mentioned at the time, but I thought I was a bloody strange call;<br>
    When A Smith fired the pass from the ruck into the retreating Crusaders player, the ref let it go... <br>
    Really, since when is that not an automatic penalty?<br><br>
    But anywho, what a freaking game, how good are the Highlanders?<br><br>
    Faddes, Faddes, who the fuck is Faddes?<br><br>
    He's really come outa nowhere and done a hell of a job firstly on the wing, then they put him to 13, and I thought meh.. can't see him doing much there, but hang on a minute... Think he could soon end up with cult hero status in Dunedin if he hasn't already.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #195

    <p>Fuck it!</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Good game. Crusaders started like a house on fire, but needed one or both of those tries to take the crowd out of the game. A couple of missed tackles and the Highlanders were away with their tails up and the Crusaders looking very rattled.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Cut to pieces by fucking Matt Faddes! Fonotia looked outclassed, lacked pace and caught in no man's land a couple of times. Shoulda started with Crotty.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>We didn't get the forward dominance we needed. I don't think we picked off any of their lineouts and their scrum largely stood up. Their backs were better - as expected.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Not too disconsolate, but I will say this.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Fuck you Luke Whitelock - spent who knows how many seasons at the Crusaders playing like a fucking softcock and then turns up with that against us. Someone needs to make him piss in a bottle and take it away for testing. And he should hand at least full season's salary back to buy beer for all the Crusaders' fans who had to put up with his half arsed efforts.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    tubbyj
    wrote on last edited by
    #196

    <p>Faddes was certainly amazing but Feikotoa seems to be struggling at 12 but you couldn't drop Faddes after that performance.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Highlanders v Crusaders
Rugby Matches
crusadershighlanders
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.