Otago v Tasman
-
@frugby said in Otago v Ta$man:
East Timor is an incredible first name.
Obviously the parents didn't Dili-dally when it came to registering his name.
-
If Otago don’t take this considering it’s pretty much a Ta$man C team, may as well replace them all with the Otago boys under 15 c team
-
@Chris-B said in Otago v Ta$man:
A real B team this week - quite a bit of C team about it! Lots of kids from the development squad.
Not surprising given that we've got a Shield Challenge vs Auckland on Wednesday and another vs Taranaki on Sunday.
Interesting to see a glimpse of the future, but we're probably handing Wellington the top seeding for the play-offs. Be annoying if we lose our last three games and slide out of the play-offs - which could happen with a storm week like this!
Don't be certain of that, Wellington will probably cock it up somehow.
-
I’ve seen this episode before… Wellington sent a B team down and still got the job done. Granted, that was a rotation squad from Otago and this one is a lot stronger on paper. If we can’t win this by a margin in the double digits that is incredibly concerning.
-
@Duluth said in Otago v Ta$man:
I think this is Faleafaga's second start of the season. He's had a few games from the bench.
I haven't watched closely. Is he out of form?
Complicated. He has been poor in his couple of bench appearances and singular start, but equally I think he is a real confidence player who just needs a run in the side. He is definitely good enough to dominate at NPC level - I am pleased to finally see him at 12.
Don't think it was anticipated Millar would be so good that he basically has to play the full 80 to give us a chance. With Gilbert as captain at 12, it meant there was no gap there until he got injured, and Hurley has been a lock in at 15.
-
The weirdest part about Faleafaga is he wasn’t part of the matchday 23 until week 4 or 5 if I remember correctly. He was playing 10 for the development side. He should have 100% been on the bench at least so unless something happened in the background that hasn’t surfaced, it’s pretty disappointing.
-
@Landers92 but he hasn’t done anything in his appearances to warrant the coaches putting him on the bench? He’s a specialist 10 who can kinda play 12. That’s not exactly the ideal bench player
-
@KiwiInLondon said in Otago v Ta$man:
@Landers92 but he hasn’t done anything in his appearances to warrant the coaches putting him on the bench? He’s a specialist 10 who can kinda play 12. That’s not exactly the ideal bench player
My comment was referring to him missing the first 4/5 weeks completely for an unknown reason. He should have 100% been on the bench during those weeks but was playing for the development side like I stated.
Upon his return though, I agree, he hasn’t done much to warrant a lot of game time. As for the part about a 10 who can play 12 isn’t an ideal bench player. I would argue a 10 who can play 12 is the ideal bench player with an outside back/centre in the 23 jersey. All bases covered.
-
Kids looking OK - nicely drilled and running some phases - defence quite solid as well.
Getting out-muscled in the scrum and a few other places and lacking a bit of x-factor or power to break the line.
Like the look of Odereyn - and Cooper Grant looks like he's a player with a bit of extra time.
Taumoefolau and Gray look the most dangerous.
-
Jeez that game flipped on its head. Last I saw it was 19-10 to Otago.
-
@Canes4life Unfortunately, it flipped back at the end.
We've got some good kids though. Can definitely see why they're excited about Maloni Kunawave.
-
Watching the highlights it seems Otago yo-yo’d between decent footie and some seriously dumb and awful defence
