Wallabies vs Springboks 2
-
It's fucking teeming with rain now.
-
@antipodean said in Wallabies vs Springboks 2:
It's fucking teeming with rain now.
Conditions not doing the Perth tourist board any favour, that's for sure.
-
-
-
Did the Wallabies decide to remove their props so they could have all their loose forwards on the field?
Surely a team that can't compete at set piece should lose a player?
-
Fk me the Wallabies are shit house. They haven’t improved at all. Same old cracking under any sort of pressure.
-
@antipodean said in Wallabies vs Springboks 2:
Did the Wallabies decide to remove their props so they could have all their loose forwards on the field?
Surely a team that can't compete at set piece should lose a player?
I think the reasoning was something like the prop was injured due to opposition foul play, so no player is removed
-
@Tordah said in Wallabies vs Springboks 2:
@antipodean said in Wallabies vs Springboks 2:
Did the Wallabies decide to remove their props so they could have all their loose forwards on the field?
Surely a team that can't compete at set piece should lose a player?
I think the reasoning was something like the prop was injured due to opposition foul play, so no player is removed
IMO that's open to abuse. Especially when you see players gingerly touching any other part of their body, but going off for a suspected HIA.
-
Lolesio is mud. Schmidt stuck between a rock and a hard place because, well, who else? Put a green Lynagh in and when he inevitably fails due to inexperience, they'll complain he shouldn't have been thrown in the deep end.
-
@antipodean said in Wallabies vs Springboks 2:
Lolesio is mud. Schmidt stuck between a rock and a hard place because, well, who else? Put a green Lynagh in and when he inevitably fails due to inexperience, they'll complain he shouldn't have been thrown in the deep end.
Should have started.
Everyone can see he's already better.
And will only get better by being played.
