Blues MOTM v Brumbies (SF)
-
@Kirwan said in Blues MOTM v Brumbies (SF):
I knew someone would focus on that one mistake, thes rest of his game was excellent
He actively negates the Blues' strength of good carry cleans by slowing down ruck ball. He's so slow that other players quickly insert themselves as scrumhalf.
-
I thought Plummer played very well. Showed some nice touches and defended well.
-
@Duluth said in Blues MOTM v Brumbies (SF):
Lam is a good example of the limits of how we are counting MOTM points. He’s had a great season but hasn’t been in the top 3 yet so has zero points
The table measures something but it doesn’t exactly match performance.
Dependable, especially in the knock outs so far
-
@Duluth said in Blues MOTM v Brumbies (SF):
Lam is a good example of the limits of how we are counting MOTM points. He’s had a great season but hasn’t been in the top 3 yet so has zero points
The table measures something but it doesn’t exactly match performance.
This is the only one I've voted...
Do they have something like where you get ten points to divvy out to players?
Or would that still not work when @Kirwan just gives Akira ten every week?
-
Lam for me - very very good again, physical, low error rate runs hard and hits hard. Love it. He's 25 - a season at 12 could throw him up towards the top level.
RR for solid lineout play and good work around the park
Dalton because his engine is top tierHoskins - superb work, lineouts in particular, lots of involvements but a few errors
Clarke has a big edge for the ABs with his work on restarts and chasing. Has gone to anothe rlevel this year, particularly in the air. Two head knocks i the game worry me though.
Plummer very solid.
Locks get a shout, along with the front row for their outstanding set piece.