RWC Week 2: Springboks v Romania
-
@Smuts really good strength in depth and giving time to AE and CM to forge a midfield partnership in case of injuries.
Forget that Mapimpi is still about. Really good test match player.
Hopefully Reinach has a good game to put some pressure on Faf.
You’ve got a front 4 and a back 4 playing up front. Should be more than enough to provide a platform for what looks like an electric back line.
-
@stodders said in RWC Week 2: Springboks v Romania:
@Smuts really good strength in depth and giving time to AE and CM to forge a midfield partnership in case of injuries.
Forget that Mapimpi is still about. Really good test match player.
Hopefully Reinach has a good game to put some pressure on Faf.
You’ve got a front 4 and a back 4 playing up front. Should be more than enough to provide a platform for what looks like an electric back line.
Yeah, pretty good team. As @SidBarret said above, there were always going to be some stretch selections in this game.
Just a delicate shouldered nudge to the punditry’s blather about selecting four scrummies in the squad.
-
@booboo said in RWC Week 2: Springboks v Romania:
@Smuts said in RWC Week 2: Springboks v Romania:
ruck rats
Never heard the term.
Love it.
Courtesy of the Specimen - terror of the Vancouver Island third division in the late 90s.
-
didnt see this posted elsewhere
-
Poor bugger
-
@booboo said in RWC Week 2: Springboks v Romania:
Bummer for Malcolm.
But every team has to deal with injuries.
That's pretty callous. Its sucks for him and it sucks for us all when one of the players who most people would put in a world 23 doesn't play