India v Aus
-
@Crazy-Horse said in India v Aus:
We have just seen an umpire review for a stumping where the Aussies also appeared to appeal for a caught behind which was turned down. Part of the review process was to look at the front view to see if there was an edge. In effect, the Aussies just got a free review for the edge. Unless there is something that has escaped me, I cannot see any reason why the front view is necessary for a stumping.
I agree that the front view is not required for a stumping.
I think it is one of those weird cricket things where you don't have to state what the appeal or review is for - the umpires just go through every option
-
@KiwiMurph said in India v Aus:
India in trouble here.
Lyon bowling brilliantly
And then their tail remembers how to bat. Hilarious.
-
-
-
@KiwiMurph said in India v Aus:
@NTA said in India v Aus:
6 down for -95 and suddenly they're going to take a first innings lead. FFS...
Spoke too soon on the innings lead
1 run.
-
-
@KiwiMurph said in India v Aus:
Advantage Australia again as Head is going full Bazball.
Warner: try not to get out and protect my batting average
Head: fucking up this guy's bowling average is my jam
-
So from 1 for a few overnight, we're now fucked.
Fall of wickets: 1-23 (Usman Khawaja, 5.5 ov), 2-65 (Travis Head, 12.6 ov), 3-85 (Steven Smith, 18.6 ov), 4-95 (Marnus Labuschagne, 21.4 ov), 5-95 (Matt Renshaw, 22.6 ov), 6-95 (Peter Handscomb, 23.1 ov), 7-95 (Pat Cummins, 23.2 ov)
Fuck me.
-
-
@ACT-Crusader said in India v Aus:
@Chris said in India v Aus:
I’m surprised Sportsbet did post their odds on “a sweep” in that tweet…
Clean sweep pays 5:2
-
Watched the highlights of Aussie 2nd innings. Some shot selection poor but the pitch was a joke. Basically cheating imho.
-
Indians didn't make the Australian batsmen throw their wickets away.
