• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

NPC 2023

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
665 Posts 47 Posters 46.3k Views
NPC 2023
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble Banned
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #403

    @Stargazer i saw it on insta so missed the twitter one but love that one of the teams called them out!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #404

    @Stargazer I'm torn between wanting to create a twitter account and abusing the shit out of NZR on it and well not wanting a twitter account because fuck that place.

    1 Reply Last reply
    10
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    wrote on last edited by
    #405

    Does anyone believe a 14 team competition is viable? First division in 90's with All Blacks playing had 9

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kev
    wrote on last edited by
    #406

    @Duluth said in NPC 2023:

    Does anyone believe a 14 team competition is viable? First division in 90's with All Blacks playing had 9

    What do you mean viable? Make money?

    2nd division is where rugby goes to die. Those Unions become feeders for larger unions who already steal school boy players.

    DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to kev on last edited by
    #407

    @kev

    Quality rugby that people will pay to watch on TV or at the ground

    Do you think it is viable?

    K 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kev
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #408

    @Duluth said in NPC 2023:

    @kev

    Quality rugby that people will pay to watch on TV or at the ground

    Do you think it is viable?

    I think it’s a huge part of system that has been the best rugby system in the world. But it’s been systematically devalued by head office who have tried more than once to cull teams. The Mako$ being one of those - but money has saved them.

    It won’t make money in its current setup because the players and coaches ride it like a free transport system. They set it up that way so they shouldn’t complain. If they want it to make money they need to promote it, start charging transfer fees, have salary caps.

    Instead they just want to have world club rugby matches, and more internationals.

    DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to kev on last edited by
    #409

    @kev said in NPC 2023:

    I think it’s a huge part of system that has been the best rugby system in the world.

    That wasn't the 14 team competition

    Do you think it's viable?

    K 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    wrote on last edited by
    #410

    I keep asking because I doubt anyone seriously thinks this format is workable. However if anyone suggests reforms it gets shot down

    My preferences would be for something similar to the 1990's 8-10 teams with All Blacks and no Super Rugby

    It would be better than the NPC continuing to fade away and 5 SR teams are all we have forever

    taniwharugbyT B 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble Banned
    replied to Duluth on last edited by Kiwiwomble
    #411

    @Duluth said in NPC 2023:

    Does anyone believe a 14 team competition is viable? First division in 90's with All Blacks playing had 9

    i think it could have been....in the 2000's if NZR had committed to promoting and driving fan engagement ....but we've had 20 years of it being neglected...its nowhere near as much of the NZ publics culture as it was in the late 90's IMO....

    I dont know if the NPC can keep going sustainably whilst super rugby exists, i just feel it splits attention/sponsorships/money/time/loyalty

    edit: i think if you had no super rugby and all blacks then 14 might work, if it had all the same money/advertising/promotion as super rugby and NPC combined.....

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #412

    @Duluth I guess the real question should be, will NZ rugby remain sustainable and viable without an NPC.

    K 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    wrote on last edited by
    #413

    A couple of things I have noticed about the NPC on TSF:

    First of all traffic is going great. We are have ~60% more traffic right now than last year (and AB's losing is generally 'good' for us)
    3 weeks ago we hit an 8 year high in traffic. That was 260% the traffic we had during the last RWC

    Fantastic

    However NPC threads have less posts, people aren't discussing NPC matches as much as previous years, the tipping comp has fewer numbers and general interest is down on previous years (SR posting was up)

    NPC needs drastic reform. Provincial unions vote in self interest. NZR can't force something through so they are just turning down the dimmer switch

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    9
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kev
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #414

    @Duluth said in NPC 2023:

    @kev said in NPC 2023:

    I think it’s a huge part of system that has been the best rugby system in the world.

    That wasn't the 14 team competition

    Do you think it's viable?

    The other system meant the end of rugby for those provinces in the 2nd division.

    I answered the viable question. It’s part of the system that gives NZ rugby the best overall outcome. It should never be thought of as a stand alone competition.

    It’s a reductionist question that ignore the system implications.

    DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to kev on last edited by
    #415

    @kev said in NPC 2023:

    I answered the viable question

    No you didn't. You have avoided it

    K 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kev
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #416

    @Duluth said in NPC 2023:

    @kev said in NPC 2023:

    I answered the viable question

    No you didn't. You have avoided it

    Ok we see it differently.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by Stargazer
    #417

    I think a 14-team competition is viable, but not in one division, or not in the current format.

    I also think a 14-team competition is necessary for rugby to survive in all 14 provinces.

    I don't think it being a 14-team competition is the root of the problem. I think the lack of promotion, the constant changes, the negative attitude of the media towards the competition (seemingly fed by NZR's attitude towards the comp.), the grounds the games are played in some provinces (stadiums too big), the prices of food/drinks a some venues, the times games are played etc are to blame.

    If some provinces live beyond their means (Wellington, for example), they should be forced to live within their means. If small provinces like Manawatū and Southland have to do it, why not the big unions?

    I think changes to SR could also help NPC, like playing more SR games in the smaller provinces.
    SR is too long (for financial gain); if they'd scrap the 2nd games against the same opponents, SR would be shorter and NPC could become longer (proper round robin).

    But again, I think a lot could be gained by good promotion of the NPC. If NZR shows enthusiasme towards the NPC instead of that stupid social media post, that could be a good first step.

    KiwiwombleK K DuluthD 3 Replies Last reply
    2
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kev
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #418

    @taniwharugby said in NPC 2023:

    @Duluth I guess the real question should be, will NZ rugby remain sustainable and viable without an NPC.

    Exactly. Will it remain the game for all NZs? Or just be a version of the Americas Cup and Team NZ.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #419

    @Duluth said in NPC 2023:

    However NPC threads have less posts, people aren't discussing NPC matches as much as previous years, the tipping comp has fewer numbers and general interest is down on previous years (SR posting was up)

    It may be like a self-fulfilling prophecy.
    Be negative on the TSF about the NPC long and often enough, and more people will become negative about the NPC. Or people stop posting about it. They'll just watch the games. The negativity here is sometimes very off-putting.

    DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble Banned
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #420

    @Stargazer i dont think you and i are 100% aligned....but there are lots of things i agree with in that post

    I think our whole rugby "pyramid" is messed up, as many AB's games and super a year and more than NPC is all back to front, less super and international, more NPC would make the higher level games more sacred/special/unmissable and NPC the default place for a rugby fix

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    bayimports
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #421

    @Duluth said in NPC 2023:

    I keep asking because I doubt anyone seriously thinks this format is workable. However if anyone suggests reforms it gets shot down

    My preferences would be for something similar to the 1990's 8-10 teams with All Blacks and no Super Rugby

    It would be better than the NPC continuing to fade away and 5 SR teams are all we have forever

    Yeah I don't think continuing is viable but I deplore NZR running it into the ground, removing investment, having other brands within the same stable make comments that suggest nothing else is on etc

    The strengths of the NPC have been its tribal nature which Super Rugby has never really achieved and that is the product they want to invest in. Super Rugby is a better product for sure but perhaps it would be better with some extra NZ players (who then don't have to play for Aus to get selected).

    I would argue you could expand the NZ teams without losing much. Its not like the Australian teams haven't devalued it anyway already 😉

    Even with my suggestion some teams will still miss out but I suspect someones going to miss out regardless

    gt12G DuluthD 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kev
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #422

    @Stargazer yep. In all its years I think Norhland got 1 or 2 Super games. They bought out our rights in the end.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

NPC 2023
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.