Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber
-
@KiwiMurph said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:
Would be interested to know why Neesham has bowled 7 overs and Mitchell 2 overs.
I'm pleasantly surprised that Kane has even bowled Mitch at all...
-
@KiwiMurph said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:
Would be interested to know why Neesham has bowled 7 overs and Mitchell 2 overs.
Probably 69 wickets in 70 ODIs vs one wicket in nine ODIs…..but what would I know ?
-
@MN5 said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:
@KiwiMurph said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:
Would be interested to know why Neesham has bowled 7 overs and Mitchell 2 overs.
Probably 69 wickets in 70 ODIs vs one wicket in nine ODIs…..but what would I know ?
Yes Neesham's career ODI bowling average of 78 vs Aussies is just too good to ignore.....
-
@KiwiMurph said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:
@MN5 said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:
@KiwiMurph said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:
Would be interested to know why Neesham has bowled 7 overs and Mitchell 2 overs.
Probably 69 wickets in 70 ODIs vs one wicket in nine ODIs…..but what would I know ?
Yes Neesham's career ODI bowling average of 78 vs Aussies is just too good to ignore.....
At least he actually has an average vs the Aussies.
I’m sure the solitary wicket that Johns son got vs Scotland sent shock waves through the cricketing world.
-
-
@nzzp said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:
Well played Smith.
Going to take something special here for us to chase whatever they get to. We just don't seem to have the little extra bit of class to roll them when we get ahead in the game.
Conway due a big score surely ?
-
@MN5 said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:
@nzzp said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:
Well played Smith.
Going to take something special here for us to chase whatever they get to. We just don't seem to have the little extra bit of class to roll them when we get ahead in the game.
Conway due a big score surely ?
Australia are making this pitch look easy to bat on. I'm no tsure we'll do the same
-
@nzzp said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:
@MN5 said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:
@nzzp said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:
Well played Smith.
Going to take something special here for us to chase whatever they get to. We just don't seem to have the little extra bit of class to roll them when we get ahead in the game.
Conway due a big score surely ?
Australia are making this pitch look easy to bat on. I'm no tsure we'll do the same
It will turn into a minefield. It always does
-
-
@kev said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:
@booboo said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:
Part of me wants to say bullshit because there's no clear evidence to overturn...
... but yeah he was out...
That’s the key no clear evidence - so how come?
Yeah. Protocol was not out. Should not have been given in the basis of the soft signal.
But he was out.
