• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Wallabies v Springboks 1

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
australiaspringboks
266 Posts 47 Posters 4.2k Views
Wallabies v Springboks 1
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to Dan54 on last edited by
    #109

    @Dan54 said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:

    Well White just made all soccer fans say, see rugby players do it too!

    That's the downside of it. White played it and the penalty should have been reversed.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #110

    After all is said and done it was very smart play by White. The Boks best player is now off the field

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    wrote on last edited by
    #111

    That was fucking dire from SA

    So much possession and field position

    Did fuck all with it

    M NTAN ACT CrusaderA 3 Replies Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #112

    @MiketheSnow said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:

    That was fucking dire from SA

    So much possession and field position

    Did fuck all with it

    They really do choke versus Oz, in Oz

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by NTA
    #113

    @MiketheSnow said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:

    That was fucking dire from SA

    So much possession and field position

    Did fuck all with it

    Didn't kick as much as they usually do. Lot of line breaks but no finishes. Looks like they want to play differently but why?

    Just kick kick kick and score.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #114

    @NTA said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:

    @antipodean said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:

    Fuck this is a joke.

    Why?

    Because he got sent from the field for 10mins for a slight, unintentional slap. It wasn't deliberate, there's almost no degree of force. Anyone making an argument for that to be a YC is a moron.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #115

    @MiketheSnow looked unimaginative after the maul when it went wide.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    wrote on last edited by
    #116

    Anyone that believes that slap should have been a yellow needs their head read. An accidental slap to face. Penalty at worse. What the fuck is rugby becoming?

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #117

    @antipodean said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:

    It wasn't deliberate, there's almost no degree of force. Anyone making an argument for that to be a YC is a moron.

    Did he make contact with the head or not?

    antipodeanA Crazy HorseC 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #118

    @NTA said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:

    @antipodean said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:

    It wasn't deliberate, there's almost no degree of force. Anyone making an argument for that to be a YC is a moron.

    Did he make contact with the head or not?

    Do you think it should be a YC or not?

    NTAN KiwiMurphK 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #119

    @antipodean said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:

    @NTA said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:

    @antipodean said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:

    It wasn't deliberate, there's almost no degree of force. Anyone making an argument for that to be a YC is a moron.

    Did he make contact with the head or not?

    Do you think it should be a YC or not?

    Yes. You can call me a moron now.

    On the flipside, I'd penalise White for his conduct and reverse the penalty.

    antipodeanA D 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #120

    @NTA said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:

    @antipodean said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:

    It wasn't deliberate, there's almost no degree of force. Anyone making an argument for that to be a YC is a moron.

    Did he make contact with the head or not?

    There is contact to the head all the time. How do you reckon the Bok got his head cut?

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #121

    @antipodean said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:

    @NTA said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:

    @antipodean said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:

    It wasn't deliberate, there's almost no degree of force. Anyone making an argument for that to be a YC is a moron.

    Did he make contact with the head or not?

    Do you think it should be a YC or not?

    No way.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #122

    @NTA said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:

    @antipodean said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:

    @NTA said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:

    @antipodean said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:

    It wasn't deliberate, there's almost no degree of force. Anyone making an argument for that to be a YC is a moron.

    Did he make contact with the head or not?

    Do you think it should be a YC or not?

    Yes. You can call me a moron now.

    So you think it was dangerous? Holy fuck.

    80cc05f0-adfa-4d6a-98a6-3fce258eae2d-image.png

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #123

    Fuck that's an awesome tackle, and he got his arms up. Just so good

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to Crazy Horse on last edited by
    #124

    @Crazy-Horse said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:

    @NTA said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:

    @antipodean said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:

    It wasn't deliberate, there's almost no degree of force. Anyone making an argument for that to be a YC is a moron.

    Did he make contact with the head or not?

    There is contact to the head all the time. How do you reckon the Bok got his head cut?

    Of course there is. It's rugby. Shit happens in contact. But this is upright at the back of a scrum with no mitigating factors other than there wasn't a lot of force in an open hand.

    Refs aren't given much option here.

    If White had been passing the ball and Faf knocked it down with that single swinging arm, would just be a penalty. But it isn't.

    Crazy HorseC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #125

    @NTA said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:

    @Crazy-Horse said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:

    @NTA said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:

    @antipodean said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:

    It wasn't deliberate, there's almost no degree of force. Anyone making an argument for that to be a YC is a moron.

    Did he make contact with the head or not?

    There is contact to the head all the time. How do you reckon the Bok got his head cut?

    Of course there is. It's rugby. Shit happens in contact. But this is upright at the back of a scrum with no mitigating factors other than there wasn't a lot of force in an open hand.

    Refs aren't given much option here.

    If White had been passing the ball and Faf knocked it down with that single swinging arm, would just be a penalty. But it isn't.

    I agree the refs have little leeway. That's because the law is an arse.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #126

    @antipodean said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:

    So you think it was dangerous? Holy fuck.

    That chart is used for multiple things, and this situation isn't one of them, so you're being a little facetious.

    And, as a ref, you should know that chart isn't a concrete set of rules.

    350de216-4067-481c-85ba-a44dc9c7f773-image.png

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #127

    @NTA the play acting is definitely the worse crime.

    Although no issue if he just awards advantage as soon as it happens eh. Kinda hard to miss.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #128

    @NTA said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:

    @antipodean said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:

    So you think it was dangerous? Holy fuck.

    That chart is used for multiple things, and this situation isn't one of them, so you're being a little facetious.

    So the Head Contact Process isn't applicable in the situation where White got slapped in the head?

    And, as a ref, you should know that chart isn't a concrete set of rules.

    350de216-4067-481c-85ba-a44dc9c7f773-image.png

    So by ignoring it, that aids consistency. Right.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Wallabies v Springboks 1
Rugby Matches
australiaspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.