Super Rugby 2023
-
@mariner4life Another way of looking at it is
Last year the gap between 7th and 11th was 23 competition points.
This year the difference between 7th and 11th was 5 competion points.
-
@KiwiMurph said in Super Rugby 2023:
@mariner4life Another way of looking at it is
Last year the gap between 7th and 11th was 23 competition points.
This year the difference between 7th and 11th was 5 competion points.
Last year the gap bewteen 1 and 7 was 23 points. This year, 33 points.
There's a massive gap developing in the comp, it's not healthy, but it ain't going away soon
-
@KiwiMurph This may be proven totally incorrect, but I'm picking it to be even tighter across the board next year. I do worry about Moana and potentially the Drua, but all of the Australian teams are likely to take a step forward/NZ sides a step back, simply because the carrot of the Lions Tour/Eddie Jones has meant strong player retention.
Western Force to crack the Top 6, and I think it could well be that they along with another Aussie side (The Tahs?) crack the Top 4. Should be good fun for all.
-
I'm Picking that these could be the rivalry games for next year... I can easily see these being tightly contested barring MP, which should hopefully aid the close competition.
2024:
BLU: CRU, CHI, MP
CHI: BLU, HUR, MP
CRU: BLU, HIG, HUR
HIG: CRU, HUR, MP
HUR: CHI, HIG, HUR
MP: BLU, CHI, HIG2023:
BLU: HUR, HIG, CRU
CHI: CRU, HUR, HIG
CRU: BLU, CHI, MP
HIG: BLU, FOR, CHI
HUR: BLU, CHI, MP
MP: CRU, HUR, DRU2022:
BLU: CHI, HIG, MP
CHI: BLU, CRU, MP
CRU: CHI, HIG, HUR
HIG: BLU, CRU, HUR
HUR: HIG, CRU, MP
MP: BLU, CHI, HUR -
@friedrugby said in Super Rugby 2023:
I'm Picking that these could be the rivalry games for next year... I can easily see these being tightly contested barring MP, which should hopefully aid the close competition.
2024:
BLU: CRU, CHI, MP
CHI: BLU, HUR, MP
CRU: BLU, HIG, HUR
HIG: CRU, HUR, MP
HUR: CHI, HIG, HUR
MP: BLU, CHI, HIG2023:
BLU: HUR, HIG, CRU
CHI: CRU, HUR, HIG
CRU: BLU, CHI, MP
HIG: BLU, FOR, CHI
HUR: BLU, CHI, MP
MP: CRU, HUR, DRU2022:
BLU: CHI, HIG, MP
CHI: BLU, CRU, MP
CRU: CHI, HIG, HUR
HIG: BLU, CRU, HUR
HUR: HIG, CRU, MP
MP: BLU, CHI, HURWatching the Hurricanes playing with themselves might not be a good look!
-
SRP currently has 12 teams same as English Premiership in which teams play each other twice (home and away) & I see no reason as to why we shouldn't do the same.
When they become a 10 team league next season the English Premiership will still have 18 regular season, 4 more than SRP does.
The Top14 remains the outlier with 26 matches - and it doesn't seem to be doing them much harm.
-
@kiwi_expat i hear the answer that these teams have much bigger squads, does anyone know but big the pro14 squads are?
-
-
@Chris with our short term injury covers...the highlanders have had 50 by my count this year...so we're not talking an exponentially bigger squad
we might be kidding our selves the current squad size is right and we need a complete rethink
-
@Kiwiwomble not sure, I know our CEO's were pushing for more regular season games, think Andrew Hore wanted a 9 month season.
-
@kiwi_expat said in Super Rugby 2023:
SRP currently has 12 teams same as English Premiership in which teams play each other twice (home and away) & I see no reason as to why we shouldn't do the same.
When they become a ten-team league next season the English Premiership will still have 18 regular season, 4 more than SRP does.
The Top14 remains the outlier with 26 matches - and it doesn't seem to be doing them much harm.
That would require:
- bigger squads
and more importantly:
- the competition to start even earlier in Summer, because there's no way the tail end of the SRP competition will be played at the same time as the July test matches (assuming these will continue, even with an overhaul of the international test calendar) and the competition having a break for test matches and then play the final stages of SRP is very unlikely, too.
So I see plenty of reason why we shouldn't do the same.
I actually find SRP more than long enough. I'm reaching that stage that I'm really looking forward to the NPC and can't wait for SRP to end.
-
@Kiwiwomble Squads absolutely need to be bigger... teams shouldn't need to be calling players in as injury cover. As well as having contracted U20 players, I think this should be the rough guide of a 48 man squad:
Loosehead Props (4x)
Tighthead Props (4x)
Hookers (4x)
Locks (6x)
Loose Forwards (9x)
Halfbacks (4x)
First Fives (4x)
Midfielders (6x)
Outside Backs (7x)If they go down this route, the answer is to play more games, and the NPC becomes a feeder competition, that is closer to the Heartland Championship. The current model where there are give or take 450 pro/kind of pro NPC players model is simply too many, and I'm sure in part contributes to the player drain.
-
@friedrugby i would also say teams should not be able to start injury cover ahead of original squad members, i'd feel like a piece of shit if i made a squad and then someone was brought in to start ahead of me
@Stargazer obviously a "9 month season" is a complete rethink of rugby in NZ, NPC would have to become a amature representative comp under super or one of the suggestions like ditching super and elevating 10 NPC teams to a new and improved NPC would have to be adopted
question though, can you elaborate more on the "cant wait for one rugby comp to end so i can watch another rugby comp" ?...isn't still the same amount of rugby roughly?
-
@Kiwiwomble It's not about the number of games, but about the comp. I prefer watching NPC over watching SRP. That's why I disagree with suggestions to ditch the NPC, make it a feeder comp for SRP, ditch provinces from the NPC to make it a 10 team comp etc etc.
-
Crusaders have used 48 players squads of 38 are a bit light.
-
@Stargazer so, would you look at it a different way, if it was NPC that got given a 9 month full home and away season?
-
@Kiwiwomble I'd prefer to keep both competitions. One after the other, just like now. Maybe make NPC a bit longer, so all provinces play each other once, but I see the practical difficulties in that, too.
Edit: what I would like to add is a proper SRP U20 competition (not the way they do it now), although that probably would be bad for local club rugby.
-
@Chris Yep but using 48 players is probably quite a difference to having that many under contract fulltime. Money becomes a huge problem, and before we get into how it works in England etc I not sure we got the coin in the game to go down theuir track. It's not just England, Wales are down to 3 teams etc. Just be careful what we start wishing for.
I do tend to go along with @Stargazer , I think it about long enough, we now have test season coming up followed by NPC, which I like Star, really enjoy, I know it's all just rugby to some, but NPC is OUR rugby!!
