• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Crusaders v Highlanders

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
highlanderscrusaders
362 Posts 41 Posters 8.6k Views
Crusaders v Highlanders
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    replied to Yeetyaah on last edited by
    #117

    @yeetyaah His kicking game may be off today, but there isn't a halfback within a 100 miles of him in NZ.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to Yeetyaah on last edited by
    #118

    @yeetyaah said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    Nuggie past it, too busy fucking around with cringey NFTs on Twitter.

    that is a random and bullshit call, not like he's on twitter right now or anything

    YeetyaahY 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Yeetyaah on last edited by KiwiMurph
    #119

    @yeetyaah said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    Nuggie past it, too busy fucking around with cringey NFTs on Twitter.

    He's carrying a very average team. He'd look a million bucks as the Crusaders 9.

    1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • MachpantsM Offline
    MachpantsM Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by Machpants
    #120

    'ball flung into open spaces' bridge makes zero metres

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    wrote on last edited by
    #121

    "its a penalty every time the want it that scrum"

    and thats what wrong with things at the moment

    MachpantsM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MachpantsM Offline
    MachpantsM Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #122

    Havili, he's no jordie

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MachpantsM Offline
    MachpantsM Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #123

    @kiwiwomble said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    "its a penalty every time the want it that scrum"

    and thats what wrong with things at the moment

    For the Highlanders? Yep

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #124

    @machpants said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    @taniwharugby said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    @gt12 maybe they could try some rush defences, at least give us more idea on breaking them down.

    Crazy that the canes won their title on immense rush defended. No tries conceded in knock outs. What the fuck had happened since then?

    Was Plums was in charge of defense then? They had Watt (forwards) and Holland (??)

    MachpantsM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #125

    @machpants said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    'ball flung into open spaces' bridge makes zero metres

    hardly a bridge champion here...but it landed about 15m from bridge, and had to coming and regather and still recycled, not like he got the ball in open space

    MachpantsM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • YeetyaahY Offline
    YeetyaahY Offline
    Yeetyaah
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #126

    @kiwiwomble said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    @yeetyaah said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    Nuggie past it, too busy fucking around with cringey NFTs on Twitter.

    that is a random and bullshit call, not like he's on twitter right now or anything

    😂 I'm just shitposting

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MachpantsM Offline
    MachpantsM Offline
    Machpants
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #127

    @gt12 said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    @machpants said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    @taniwharugby said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    @gt12 maybe they could try some rush defences, at least give us more idea on breaking them down.

    Crazy that the canes won their title on immense rush defended. No tries conceded in knock outs. What the fuck had happened since then?

    Was Plums was in charge of defense then? They had Watt (forwards) and Holland (??)

    I'm not really thinking of personell, more why the fuck did we move away from rush?

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    wrote on last edited by
    #128

    Good first half from Newell getting more starts so growing into his game.

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MachpantsM Offline
    MachpantsM Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by Machpants
    #129

    @kiwiwomble said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    @machpants said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    'ball flung into open spaces' bridge makes zero metres

    hardly a bridge champion here...but it landed about 15m from bridge, and had to coming and regather and still recycled, not like he got the ball in open space

    Twas joke. Just made me laugh coming from TJ

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to Machpants on last edited by gt12
    #130

    @machpants said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    @gt12 said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    @machpants said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    @taniwharugby said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    @gt12 maybe they could try some rush defences, at least give us more idea on breaking them down.

    Crazy that the canes won their title on immense rush defended. No tries conceded in knock outs. What the fuck had happened since then?

    Was Plums was in charge of defense then? They had Watt (forwards) and Holland (??)

    I'm not really thinking of personell, more why the fuck did we move away from rush?

    I’m speculating about whether that might be related to coaches. Although, as the Canes looked uncoached, maybe the players are dreaming up the system on their way to the field each day.

    MachpantsM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #131

    @machpants said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    @kiwiwomble said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    "its a penalty every time the want it that scrum"

    and thats what wrong with things at the moment

    For the Highlanders? Yep

    you think its good rugby any team can basically force a penalty out of another?

    MachpantsM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MachpantsM Offline
    MachpantsM Offline
    Machpants
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #132

    @gt12 said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    @machpants said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    @gt12 said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    @machpants said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    @taniwharugby said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    @gt12 maybe they could try some rush defences, at least give us more idea on breaking them down.

    Crazy that the canes won their title on immense rush defended. No tries conceded in knock outs. What the fuck had happened since then?

    Was Plums was in charge of defense then? They had Watt (forwards) and Holland (??)

    I'm not really thinking of personell, more why the fuck did we move away from rush?

    I’m speculating about whether that might be related to coaches. Although, as the Canes looked I coached, maybe the players are dreaming up the system on their way to the field each day.

    But all the NZ super teams, and ABs, defend so passively now. It's bizarre

    gt12G KiwiMurphK 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #133

    @chris said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    Good first half from Newell getting more starts so growing into his game.

    Good to see him with the ball in his hands a bit too.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MachpantsM Offline
    MachpantsM Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #134

    @kiwiwomble said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    @machpants said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    @kiwiwomble said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    "its a penalty every time the want it that scrum"

    and thats what wrong with things at the moment

    For the Highlanders? Yep

    you think its good rugby any team can basically force a penalty out of another?

    If you're that much better, yes.

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to Machpants on last edited by gt12
    #135

    @machpants said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    @gt12 said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    @machpants said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    @gt12 said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    @machpants said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    @taniwharugby said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    @gt12 maybe they could try some rush defences, at least give us more idea on breaking them down.

    Crazy that the canes won their title on immense rush defended. No tries conceded in knock outs. What the fuck had happened since then?

    Was Plums was in charge of defense then? They had Watt (forwards) and Holland (??)

    I'm not really thinking of personell, more why the fuck did we move away from rush?

    I’m speculating about whether that might be related to coaches. Although, as the Canes looked I coached, maybe the players are dreaming up the system on their way to the field each day.

    But all the NZ super teams, and ABs, defend so passively now. It's bizarre

    And you don’t think that’s related to coaching/coaches?

    MachpantsM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #136

    @machpants said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    @gt12 said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    @machpants said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    @gt12 said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    @machpants said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    @taniwharugby said in Crusaders v Highlanders:

    @gt12 maybe they could try some rush defences, at least give us more idea on breaking them down.

    Crazy that the canes won their title on immense rush defended. No tries conceded in knock outs. What the fuck had happened since then?

    Was Plums was in charge of defense then? They had Watt (forwards) and Holland (??)

    I'm not really thinking of personell, more why the fuck did we move away from rush?

    I’m speculating about whether that might be related to coaches. Although, as the Canes looked I coached, maybe the players are dreaming up the system on their way to the field each day.

    But all the NZ super teams, and ABs, defend so passively now. It's bizarre

    Blues defence has taken a step back this year too - under Tana they were much more physical and pressing (whilst admittedly also being highly penalised - but at least it was a different style).

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

Crusaders v Highlanders
Rugby Matches
highlanderscrusaders
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.