NZ v Australia Test #2
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="barbarian" data-cid="560052" data-time="1456137937">
<div><br><p>Mitch Marsh is still a giant question mark. Obviously has talent but needs runs, luckily no-one seems to be banging down the door for his place at the moment.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Maxwell on the subcontinent maybe? He seems like a guy who still very much has his eye on tests & one good 4 test tour to India might be all it takes.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="barbarian" data-cid="560052" data-time="1456137937">
<div>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Mitch Marsh is still a giant question mark. Obviously has talent but needs runs, luckily no-one seems to be banging down the door for his place at the moment.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="gollum" data-cid="560059" data-time="1456150139">
<div>
<p>Maxwell on the subcontinent maybe? He seems like a guy who still very much has his eye on tests & one good 4 test tour to India might be all it takes.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>I think they'll give him time (well as much as you can in Oz cricket).</p>
<p> </p>
<p>His bowling as the 4th seamer is the goods and it allows the favoured balance of 3 quicks and Lyon. He's got the raw ingredients, as you said, of Watto and they gave him a lot of opportunities.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>One thing all the successful teams have taught us is if you think they've got the real mental and physical talent, then perservere. e.g. Steve Smith</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Interesting listening to cricketers commentate, Punter, KP, Flintoff etc they're flaberghasted that the public laymen bag Watto, they see him as a pretty much auto selection and opposition feared and rated him</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Siam" data-cid="560060" data-time="1456152008">
<div><br><p> </p>
<p>Interesting listening to cricketers commentate, Punter, KP, Flintoff etc they're flaberghasted that the public laymen bag Watto, they see him as a pretty much auto selection and opposition feared and rated him</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Watson was unlucky in that he was an outstanding prospect at 6 but got moved up to open / 3 because of Aussie issues. You feel the thing they will do with Marsh is give him time as you say, but also not fuck him about moving him all over as they did with Watson. </p> -
Kane to nab BMacs high score....
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Siam" data-cid="560060" data-time="1456152008">
<div>
<p>I think they'll give him time (well as much as you can in Oz cricket).</p>
<p> </p>
<p>His bowling as the 4th seamer is the goods and it allows the favoured balance of 3 quicks and Lyon. He's got the raw ingredients, as you said, of Watto and they gave him a lot of opportunities.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>One thing all the successful teams have taught us is if you think they've got the real mental and physical talent, then perservere. e.g. Steve Smith</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Interesting listening to cricketers commentate, Punter, KP, Flintoff etc they're flaberghasted that the public laymen bag Watto, they see him as a pretty much auto selection and opposition feared and rated him</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Surely people do rate Watson but just like mocking him? I would rate Watson not too far behind Flintoff in terms of value to a team.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="taniwharugby" data-cid="560063" data-time="1456163321">
<div>
<p>Kane to nab BMacs high score....</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Just need someone to hang around with him. Hopefully its watling as I get that feeling that Southee isnt the man for the job</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="JK" data-cid="560070" data-time="1456166873">
<div>
<p>Hopefully its watling as I get that feeling that Southee isnt the man for the job</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>We keep you here for your cricketing insight JK.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I was impressed with Anderson towards the end of yesterday - did what he had to do to survive. He needs to show that he is more than just a clunker of the ball.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The ball that got Guptill wasn't even a challenging delivery, outside off coming in on the angle - Guppy just seemed to be late getting there, it was almost catching practice.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Hard to see NZ getting a lead of over 100 unfortunately but we can dream ....</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="KiwiPie" data-cid="560071" data-time="1456168112">
<div>
<p><strong>We keep you here for your cricketing insight JK.</strong></p>
<p> </p>
<p>I was impressed with Anderson towards the end of yesterday - did what he had to do to survive. He needs to show that he is more than just a clunker of the ball.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The ball that got Guptill wasn't even a challenging delivery, outside off coming in on the angle - Guppy just seemed to be late getting there, it was almost catching practice.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Hard to see NZ getting a lead of over 100 unfortunately but we can dream ....</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I was going to write something cheeky too but am glad I didn't as that made me laugh</p> -
-
<p>wouldn't we be more like Aus. given neither Ireland or Scotland have beaten the ABs' and Wallabies do so from time to time also, as have the Black Caps, we look shit hot against most other teams but when the heat comes on and it matters, neither the Wallabies or BCs can make that next step.</p>
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="taniwharugby" data-cid="560082" data-time="1456173802">
<div>
<p>wouldn't we be more like Aus. given neither Ireland or Scotland have beaten the ABs' and Wallabies do so from time to time also, as have the Black Caps, we look shit hot against most other teams but when the heat comes on and it matters, neither the Wallabies or BCs can make that next step.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>No that's a really dumb analogy, the Wallabies have won the WC twice. Black Caps never have.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Hooroo" data-cid="560083" data-time="1456174495">
<div>
<p>You are all mad!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>We are France! Made it to WC final, never won the thing. Can look sublime and ridiculous within two games!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Flair and misfortune!!</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I've always thought Pakistan and France were the most comparable.....volatile brilliant players who can smash the best but also get a hiding from the worst.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Help us Obi Wan Kaneobi......you're our only hope</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Hooroo" data-cid="560088" data-time="1456176276">
<div>
<p>No that's a really dumb anaolgy as Pakistan have won the WC....</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Standing by for a "like" from TR in 3......2.......1......</p>
<p> </p>
<p>They haven't won it twice so that makes my argument basically foolproof.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="MN5" data-cid="560084" data-time="1456174789">
<div>
<p>No that's a really dumb analogy, the Wallabies have won the WC twice. Black Caps never have.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>better than your dumb ones, even Monique thinks you're dumb!</p>
