2023 (expanded) World Cup in South Africa

jegga

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="mariner4life" data-cid="554651" data-time="1453936307">look, when you've got a narrative going, changing it just looks weak</blockquote>
 
Of course, I call that " wingerising" or " to wingerise".

Disgusted of TW

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="jegga" data-cid="554614" data-time="1453932378">Is the weather in Ireland really any different to England? The last rwc produced some fantastic running rugby , I can't see why Ireland wouldn't be the same .</blockquote>
 
Inside The Pale, maybe. Out in the fwesht, it can be a very different kettle of fish. Which reminds me, Mrs DoTW and I are about due for our annual "discussion" where I suggest the mother country for summer hols as opposed to her suggestion of, ooh, anywhere but.

MN5

Weather is an irrelevant argument, no one knows when it's gonna piss down, in the SA/France semi of 95 in 'hot, dry' South Africa I genuinely worried that someone might drown at the bottom of a ruck or maul. 
Closer to home I had a lot of free time set aside to watch the cricket today, damn you Hawkes Bay!!!!!!

Rowan

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="jegga" data-cid="554643" data-time="1453935640">
<div>
There's that attempt at distraction again , pretty sad behaviour IMHO 
Care to explain why a rwc in the Uk can produce running rugby but one in Ireland wouldn't? 
" really really dislike South Africa " ffs, what a joke
</div>
</blockquote>
 
Sure, just checked the average October weather conditions for London, Dublin and Belfast.
 
In London the average temperature is 13 degrees with 5 hours of sunshine and a 50% chance of rain.
In Dublin the average temperature is 10 degrees with 3 hours of sunshine and a 60% chance of rain.
In Belfast the average temperature is 9 degrees with 2 hours of sunshine and a 74% chance of rain.
 
So it's the idea I have a chip on my shoulder about Ireland which is a joke, clearly.

Hooroo

The weather again? Is that it?
 
OK, we understand, you don't like it wet, I'm not surprised, but that's hardly a reason for this thread.

jegga

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Rowan" data-cid="554662" data-time="1453937005">Sure, just checked the average October weather conditions for London, Dublin and Belfast. 
 
In London the average temperature is 13 degrees with 5 hours of sunshine and a 50% chance of rain. 
In Dublin the average temperature is 10 degrees with 3 hours of sunshine and a 60% chance of rain. 
In Belfast the average temperature is 9 degrees with 2 hours of sunshine and a 74% chance of rain. 
 
So it's the idea I have a chip on my shoulder about Ireland which is a joke, clearly.</blockquote>
 
It's not that you have a chip on your shoulder about Ireland it's that you've decided South Africa is the only possible place for the rwc and got your knickers in a twist when it was pointed out your reasons why don't add up. Brining Samoa and Fiji into the discussion adds weight to the idea that you're starting to see holes in your own reasoning if you have to go to those silly lengths as does your post about " two cities and a bunch of towns" . 
Fully understand if you're feeling a bit embarrassed about your earlier posts but feel you've gone too far down the South Africa path to back up now . I would be in your shoes too, I doubt I'd try and divert attention away by saying silly things like " you really really dislike South Africa" . But then again I read your post on the t2 forum and your arguments got torn to pieces there and you started bringing up terrorism in Europe so who knows what sort of tangent you'll go off on next ?

Rowan

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="jegga" data-cid="554650" data-time="1453936238">
<div>
Why are you saying two cities and a bunch of towns when it's already been pointed out that that is not true?
</div>
</blockquote>
 
Ireland really only has one large city - Dublin. Belfast is a medium size city of just under half a million. Cork is the only other city with over 100,000, but it's a small city by anyone's standards - even New Zealand's. Beyond that, there are only 3 more municipalities with more than 75,000. Most countries would consider those 'towns.'
 
South Africa has four large cities of over a million (Jo'burg has more people than Ireland), and six more medium size cities of around 400,000 or over. It also has about a dozen additional small cities of over 100,000, and perhaps a dozen more large towns of between 75,000 and 100,000.

mariner4life

half of which live in poverty, with 20% living in extreme poverty.

Rowan

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Hooroo" data-cid="554666" data-time="1453937452">
<div>
The weather again? Is that it?
 
OK, we understand, you don't like it wet, I'm not surprised, but that's hardly a reason for this thread.
</div>
</blockquote>
 
I was answering a question. I just answered another. If you want to see my wider views on the topic, go to the top of the thread and see my original post. In terms of my nationality and location, I'm a complete neutral on the topic. My preference is determined solely by what I regard as being in the best interests of rugby.

gt12

Checks avatar, leaves thread.

jegga

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Rowan" data-cid="554669" data-time="1453938012">Ireland really only has one large city - Dublin. Belfast is a medium size city of just under half a million. Cork is the only other city with over 100,000, but it's a small city by anyone's standards - even New Zealand's. Beyond that, there are only 3 more municipalities with more than 75,000. Most countries would consider those 'towns.' 
 
South Africa has four large cities of over a million (Jo'burg has more people than Ireland), and six more medium size cities of around 400,000 or over. It also has about a dozen additional small cities of over 100,000, and perhaps a dozen more large towns of between 75,000 and 100,000. </blockquote>
 
So there are actually five cities in Ireland not two like you've been saying?

Hooroo

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Rowan" data-cid="554671" data-time="1453938266">
<div>
I was answering a question. I just answered another. If you want to see my wider views on the topic, go to the top of the thread and see my original post. In terms of my nationality and location, I'm a complete neutral on the topic. My preference is determined solely by what I regard as being in the best interests of rugby.
</div>
</blockquote>
I understand that but your points of 'debate' are weak and have been pointed out by most.
 
There isn't anything in this thread from your username to show in any way that the interests of rugby would be bettered by having the 2023 WC in SA with 24 teams. The worst part is your logic and sustinence to carry this on is only padded by 'the weather is better there' argument

Rowan

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="mariner4life" data-cid="554670" data-time="1453938263">
<div>
half of which live in poverty, with 20% living in extreme poverty. 
</div>
</blockquote>
 
Sadly true. But the other half still dwarfs Ireland. & a World Cup might also help the cause. The 2015 tournament is thought to have injected 2 billion pounds into the British economy - exceeding the expense of staging it manifold. The comment has often been made that it's a shame major events like this are invariably held in wealthy countries, when they could do so much to help boost the economies of poorer countries,

Rowan

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="jegga" data-cid="554673" data-time="1453938401">
<div>
So there are actually five cities in Ireland not two like you've been saying?
</div>
</blockquote>
 
What is this - a police investigation?
 
It depends on your perspective, actually. Different countries have different standards. Pretty sure only Dublin and Belfast would be regarded as cities States side. In New Zealand I think anything over 20,000 is considered a city.

taniwharugby

I'd of thought Ireland would get more non-Irish people travel to watch games in Ireland than SA would get non-SA people travelling to SA.

jegga

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Rowan" data-cid="554677" data-time="1453938754">Sadly true. But the other half still dwarfs Ireland. & a World Cup might also help the cause. The 2015 tournament is thought to have injected 2 billion pounds into the British economy - exceeding the expense of staging it manifold. The comment has often been made that it's a shame major events like this are invariably held in wealthy countries, when they could do so much to help boost the economies of poorer countries,</blockquote>
 
Two billion pounds? Can you give me a link to that? I had no idea the rwc was so lucrative.

Hooroo

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="taniwharugby" data-cid="554679" data-time="1453939195">
<div>
I'd of thought Ireland would get more non-Irish people travel to watch games than SA would get non-SA people travelling.
</div>
</blockquote>
I'd say it would too.

jegga

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Rowan" data-cid="554678" data-time="1453939091">What is this - a police investigation? 
 
It depends on your perspective, actually. Different countries have different standards. Pretty sure only Dublin and Belfast would be regarded as cities States side. In New Zealand I think anything over 20,000 is considered a city.</blockquote>
 
Ignoring the silly comment about a police investigation your perspective is irrevelant . Ireland has five cities , claiming otherwise makes you look foolish and dishonest .

mikedogz

South Africa have Bidded for rights for 2011, 2015 and 2019 and have failed each time. There must be something they are doing wrong. 
 
I think that it should go to a completeley new country of significant size. I say North America, USA/Canada combined or USA alone.
 
<a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rugby_World_Cup_hosts'>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rugby_World_Cup_hosts</a>
 
Current criteria
The International Rugby Board requires for a country to host a Rugby World Cup, it must possess the necessary facilities. Stadiums must have a capacity at least 15,000, with the stadium for the final having a capacity of at least 60,000.[1] The stadiums have other requirements, such as pitch size and floodlighting.[2]
 
World Rugby also looks for hosts that will either generate significant revenue or hosts that will spread the geographic reach of the sport. According to World Rugby Chairman Bernard Lapasset in 2008: "As the revenue generation is vital to our ongoing development plans, we recognise that the World Cup has to be held in one of our senior core markets on a regular basis . . . However, the commercial success of the tournament also means we can now consider placing the tournament in new developing markets to assist the game's strategic growth."[3]

jegga

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="taniwharugby" data-cid="554679" data-time="1453939195">I'd of thought Ireland would get more non-Irish people travel to watch games in Ireland than SA would get non-SA people travelling to SA.</blockquote>
 
I would agree with that, people from the uk and the rest of Europe not to mention expats from the sh. I doubt SA has large communities of expats to draw on for games not involving the boks.

The Silver Fern

2023 (expanded) World Cup in South Africa