• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
crusadersblues
557 Posts 49 Posters 26.5k Views
SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to Nepia on last edited by pakman
    #393

    @nepia said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    So just watched a replay of this match. Haven't read the match thread so this may have been covered.

    WTF was the ref thinking for the the 57 minute ruck penalty he gave to the Crusaders?

    Three seperate Crusaders came in from the side and Richie Mo'unga lifted Christie in the air and pushed him over the ruck (I mean he is a ginga but still). Then he awards the penalty to the Crusaders?

    Also Mo'unga when arriving had just flopped on the ruck and then Reece went round behind him and flopped on him, then Reece did a fake Hollywood falling backwards while one of the other players came in the side.

    Not sure anyone was supporting their weight when penalty given on Chch goal line. More case of lying on bodies and reaching over. Think Papili'i told the ref as much. Huge swinger.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #394

    @kiwimurph said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    @pakman said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    @kiwimurph said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    @kev said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    @broughie said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    @akan004 said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    @broughie said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    McDonald must be tearing his hair out. Maybe he should just select players outside of Auckland because their is a funk that can’t be removed. I don’t blame him at all.

    He has to accept a lot of blame for his terrible selections.

    There has been coach after coach that has gone through Auckland without success. When does the blame rest with the players and culture of the area?

    Exactly, the Coaches job to sift through this and find the winning formula. Not easy with Blues as we have seen.

    It's not easy when you keep picking the same failed players week after week after week.

    Plummer/Tele'a?

    Ruru/Perofeta.

    Don't talk to me about Ruru.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #395

    @bones said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    @pakman said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    @machpants said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    @kiwimurph said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    Penalty only?? Wtf.

    Was normal tackle, penalty only, he tried to wrap but the guy flew backwards

    Tele'a taken out of game by foul play. Feels like it ought to have been yellow.

    Nah I think that was fair for just a penalty. It was half Tele'a running into him.

    I used 'Feels' because I suspect the ref ruled it by the book. But totally unneccessary and changed the game.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #396

    @pakman said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    @machpants said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    @kiwimurph said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    Penalty only?? Wtf.

    Was normal tackle, penalty only, he tried to wrap but the guy flew backwards

    Tele'a taken out of game by foul play. Feels like it ought to have been yellow.

    As it turns out, Tele'a was taken out of the game by the match doctor, not by foul play.

    P boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    African Monkey
    wrote on last edited by
    #397

    Well another year of turning up to that dump of a stadium in Addington and another year of leaving empty handed for the Blues (17 years and counting haha).

    We vertainly created plenty of opportunities but as usual, we weren't ruthless enough when it counted, where as the Crusaders were, and that was pretty much the difference. We lack serious direction from our 9, 10, and 12 and Perofeta is offering bugger all from the back. Why Havili wasn't binned for his late shot I'll never know but never mind, it wouldn't have made a difference.

    Akira, Sotutu and Papali'i were brilliant I thought but they lacked support from anyone else especially our backline which is all over the place right now. One thing that annoys me is our lack of urgency in support for when someone makes a break. Our fast men (especially our halfbacks) should be sprinting up to support but instead we had a broken Papali'i in support for Akira, and no-one in sight for Clarke.

    Would like to see a few young players blooded for next week. Sullivan at the back for starters would be good, as would Kneepkins in there somewhere.

    nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to trodthesod on last edited by
    #398

    @trodthesod said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    Saddest part of that loss was Dalton Papallii’s knee injury.He Is having a fabulous year.A couple of weeks off now I suppose.

    In the radio interview after the game, he sounded quite optimistic. Said his knee needed to be checked, but he didn't think it was too bad. Fingers crossed.

    mofitzy_M 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #399

    @stargazer said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    @pakman said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    @machpants said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    @kiwimurph said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    Penalty only?? Wtf.

    Was normal tackle, penalty only, he tried to wrap but the guy flew backwards

    Tele'a taken out of game by foul play. Feels like it ought to have been yellow.

    As it turns out, Tele'a was taken out of the game by the match doctor, not by foul play.

    Still sucks!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus Banned
    replied to African Monkey on last edited by
    #400

    @african-monkey said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    Well another year of turning up to that dump of a stadium in Addington and another year of leaving empty handed for the Blues (17 years and counting haha).

    We vertainly created plenty of opportunities but as usual, we weren't ruthless enough when it counted, where as the Crusaders were, and that was pretty much the difference. We lack serious direction from our 9, 10, and 12 and Perofeta is offering bugger all from the back. Why Havili wasn't binned for his late shot I'll never know but never mind, it wouldn't have made a difference.

    Akira, Sotutu and Papali'i were brilliant I thought but they lacked support from anyone else especially our backline which is all over the place right now. One thing that annoys me is our lack of urgency in support for when someone makes a break. Our fast men (especially our halfbacks) should be sprinting up to support but instead we had a broken Papali'i in support for Akira, and no-one in sight for Clarke.

    Would like to see a few young players blooded for next week. Sullivan at the back for starters would be good, as would Kneepkins in there somewhere.

    Not according to other posters, can't see the game live but in particular, judging by this thread, posters are watching two different Akiras.

    P A Victor MeldrewV boobooB 4 Replies Last reply
    1
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to nostrildamus on last edited by pakman
    #401

    @nostrildamus said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    @african-monkey said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    Well another year of turning up to that dump of a stadium in Addington and another year of leaving empty handed for the Blues (17 years and counting haha).

    We vertainly created plenty of opportunities but as usual, we weren't ruthless enough when it counted, where as the Crusaders were, and that was pretty much the difference. We lack serious direction from our 9, 10, and 12 and Perofeta is offering bugger all from the back. Why Havili wasn't binned for his late shot I'll never know but never mind, it wouldn't have made a difference.

    Akira, Sotutu and Papali'i were brilliant I thought but they lacked support from anyone else especially our backline which is all over the place right now. One thing that annoys me is our lack of urgency in support for when someone makes a break. Our fast men (especially our halfbacks) should be sprinting up to support but instead we had a broken Papali'i in support for Akira, and no-one in sight for Clarke.

    Would like to see a few young players blooded for next week. Sullivan at the back for starters would be good, as would Kneepkins in there somewhere.

    Not according to other posters, can't see the game live but in particular, judging by this thread, posters are watching two different Akiras.

    Akira may have done less donkey work than some might like, but he unquestionably provided more go forward than any of the other forwards on either side.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #402

    @stargazer
    He needs a rest anyway. Blues have Gibson and Choat as back ups, who are perfectly serviceable.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Billy TellB Offline
    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy Tell
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #403

    @sparky said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    @billy-tell said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    Papilii was excellent for the Blues and would be my choice for the AB 7 jersey.

    My ABs backline from 9 to 15: Smith, Mounga, Ioane, Havili, ALB, Jordan, Barrett the giraffe

    Papilii has been the Blues Player of the Season by some distance. Ready IMHO to be given the AB 7 Jersey until Sam Cane if fit.

    More or less agree on that backline. The AB coaches might back themselves to fix Caleb Clarke's workrate and finishing issue. Such a talent, but he hasn't delivered for the Blues this year for some reason.

    I'd go with DMac at 10 ahead of Mo'unga. Loving his distribution and game management at First Five this year.

    Yeah DMac has been going very well. I wouldn’t be fussed if he was chosen ahead of mounga for the start. Think mounga is a better goal kicker though.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    African Monkey
    replied to nostrildamus on last edited by
    #404

    @nostrildamus He was good. Everytime he carried he got us going forward. 11 strong carries in 30 minutes suggests to me that his workrate that continues to get questioned for whatever reason Was strong.

    I've admitted myself that he has been below standard of late but he was very good when he came on. Don't really wanna say it, but to say he wasn't good today is out of pure dislike for the guy.

    Dan54D ACT CrusaderA 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor Meldrew
    replied to nostrildamus on last edited by Victor Meldrew
    #405

    @nostrildamus said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    Not according to other posters, can't see the game live but in particular, judging by this thread, posters are watching two different Akiras.

    Watched him closely for about 10 minutes and he was doing a shed-load of unspectacular grunt work.

    Always thought he was talented, but had plenty of concern about his attitude in the past, but he really seems to have put that behind him and hope he can kick on from his AB form of last year.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    replied to African Monkey on last edited by
    #406

    @african-monkey said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    @nostrildamus He was good. Everytime he carried he got us going forward. 11 strong carries in 30 minutes suggests to me that his workrate that continues to get questioned for whatever reason Was strong.

    I've admitted myself that he has been below standard of late but he was very good when he came on. Don't really wanna say it, but to say he wasn't good today is out of pure dislike for the guy.

    Akira had his best game for year, or part game, but bottom line is he struggling to get a start in Blues, so says a bit about his form this year. I thought both him and Sotutu wer pretty below average in last game and left Papali'i on his own one of resons that Clan touched them up. Akira to me is just frustrating, so much potential, but has basically had one good game this year so far.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to African Monkey on last edited by
    #407

    @african-monkey said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    @nostrildamus He was good. Everytime he carried he got us going forward. 11 strong carries in 30 minutes suggests to me that his workrate that continues to get questioned for whatever reason Was strong.

    I've admitted myself that he has been below standard of late but he was very good when he came on. Don't really wanna say it, but to say he wasn't good today is out of pure dislike for the guy.

    He was excellent yesterday. Offered a point of difference when he came on. Bought a bit of energy in attack which the Blues were lacking.

    I’m more concerned about his brother, he is very up and down. I like him on the AB wing which is looking more and more unlikely IMO given his form.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • Cantab79C Offline
    Cantab79C Offline
    Cantab79
    wrote on last edited by
    #408

    Does any NZ player divide opinions as much as Akira Ioane? There is something about Akira Ioane, people either love him or hate him. People can watch the same game and see completely different performances. Fwiw I thought he was excellent with ball in hand.

    Dan54D Victor MeldrewV 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Machpants on last edited by booboo
    #409

    @machpants said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    @kiwimurph said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    Brilliant by Sotutu.

    Wow, didn't touch the line!

    Just catching up with thread.

    Two things pissed me off with this incident.

    Firstly the comms going on about how (I think it was) Sotutu being accidentally offside.

    I kind of don't mind them being wrong about matters of interpretation, but when they get clear and obvious facts wrong that's inexcusable.

    Second, there was no clear and obvious evidence that the ball did not touch the line. In fact I reckon there was evidence to show it might just have scraped it. Therefore on field decision should have stood.

    But, otherwise ...

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #410

    @gt12 said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    Havili again, he’s good at 12, even if he doesn’t like it.

    Yep. Warming to the idea. Looked quite a solid unit last night. He bulked up? Or just standing nearer to Mo'unga make him look bigger?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to kev on last edited by
    #411

    @kev said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    @crucial said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    @machpants said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    A player must not tackle an opponent who is not in possession of the ball.

    Sanction: Penalty

    The whole dangerous play section says penalty. Once that penalty is decided you decide if it warrants more.
    To me that was a prime example of why tackles without the ball are considered dangerous. Plus the player was injured to the point that they couldn’t continue.
    Deserved more than a penalty IMO

    @crucial said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    @machpants said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    A player must not tackle an opponent who is not in possession of the ball.

    Sanction: Penalty

    The whole dangerous play section says penalty. Once that penalty is decided you decide if it warrants more.
    To me that was a prime example of why tackles without the ball are considered dangerous. Plus the player was injured to the point that they couldn’t continue.
    Deserved more than a penalty IMO

    The injury was caused by the way he landed not the contact. Penalty only for me. Unlucky though.

    Well he ain't going to land that way unless he is hit dangerously off the ball ...

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Frank on last edited by
    #412

    @frank said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    @gt12 said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:

    Grace’s position in the ABs should be under serious threat from Blackadder. They are both big workers but Blackadder is also a running threat.

    Yep. Grace doesn't look like anything special at the moment.

    Second season blues. Was excited by his firm last year. Been quite meh this season.

    Conversely, Sotutu seemed to step out of his second season funk last night. Much bigly step up in form after muddling through most of the season.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2

SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues
Rugby Matches
crusadersblues
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.