SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues
-
-
@kiwimurph said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
Perofeta not once had his position challenged this year.... sums it up.
He is a first playing at Fullback. Offers not much.
-
@kiwimurph said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
Perofeta not once had his position challenged this year.... sums it up.
If they can bring in Barrett and give Zarn a chance next year, this team could be really dangerous. Halfback is still a concern but the Blues have/will have the cattle to be the best team in the competition.
-
@kiwimurph said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
@chris against Renata and 7 men....
Yeah some credit he’s a baby wait and see
-
-
@chris good point , but this game is still about taking your chances
-
@kev said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
@chris said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
I still think the blues selection have helped the Saders
Should have started Akita for one.Akira’s work rate has been very low.
Agreed but Just think he’s a real danger with ball in hand
-
@kev said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
@chris said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
I still think the blues selection have helped the Saders
Should have started Akita for one.Akira’s work rate has been very low.
What?
He has the second highest number of runs and second highest run metres for the forwards, and he’s only played 25 odd minutes?
Edit: 7 defenders beaten (easily no. 1) plus two offloads and one clean break
And no missed tackles.
-
@gt12 said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
@kev said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
@chris said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
I still think the blues selection have helped the Saders
Should have started Akita for one.Akira’s work rate has been very low.
What?
He has the second highest number of runs and second highest run metres for the forwards, and he’s only played 25 odd minutes?
It was a joke by Kev i believe
-
@gt12 said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
@kiwimurph said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
Perofeta not once had his position challenged this year.... sums it up.
If they can bring in Barrett and give Zarn a chance next year, this team could be really dangerous. Halfback is still a concern but the Blues have/will have the cattle to be the best team in the competition.
Nock and Christie are fine. Even Ruru. The Blues problems are wider and more general than a single position.
-
@steven-harris said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
@chris good point , but this game is still about taking your chances
True but I think the selections hurt the Blues they lost rhythm.
Now the Chiefs May rest players but if the Blues win with a bonus point and deny the chiefs a point. They can make the final
On points diff
So a dilemma for the Chiefs maybe a risk to rest players. -
@kev said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
@gt12 said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
@kiwimurph said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
Perofeta not once had his position challenged this year.... sums it up.
If they can bring in Barrett and give Zarn a chance next year, this team could be really dangerous. Halfback is still a concern but the Blues have/will have the cattle to be the best team in the competition.
Nock and Christie are fine. Even Ruru. The Blues problems are wider and more general than a single position.
Dude Ruru is not fine. The guy cannot pass and has dodgy hands. And a bad decision maker. As a 9....
-
Without Moody, a wobbly scrum, no AB centre, halfbacks that still make silly errors, poor discipline that cost us 3 points too often. Very surprised we are leading the comp.
