Pasifika SR team
-
@duluth said in Pasifika SR team:
@snowy said in Pasifika SR team:
So what is the actual goal here? Simply more matches?
The end result could well be - To weaken the comp again? Keep adding teams until the standard is degraded and we, as sports fans, prefer the Bunnings NPC? The blues back to being shit? (Actually I think that is the master plan - but I like conspiracies).
NZR wanted another NZ team. The current SR license holders didn't want that. Blues are the only NZ franchise without a private license holder, therefore no opposition to NZR. Blues get a team in their backyard.
my guess is they saw all those Tongan flags on the first day of the 2011 RWC and their eyes lit up. And if those fans can become engaged then it's not an idea without merit.
-
@mariner4life said in Pasifika SR team:
@duluth said in Pasifika SR team:
@snowy said in Pasifika SR team:
So what is the actual goal here? Simply more matches?
The end result could well be - To weaken the comp again? Keep adding teams until the standard is degraded and we, as sports fans, prefer the Bunnings NPC? The blues back to being shit? (Actually I think that is the master plan - but I like conspiracies).
NZR wanted another NZ team. The current SR license holders didn't want that. Blues are the only NZ franchise without a private license holder, therefore no opposition to NZR. Blues get a team in their backyard.
my guess is they saw all those Tongan flags on the first day of the 2011 RWC and their eyes lit up. And if those fans can become engaged then it's not an idea without merit.
Except, unless the rules are actual Island born/bred players, it'll be just another reduction in depth of the other NZ SR sides. And that is what is going to happen, you imagine if NZR was seen to be denying pacifika players the right to play - already there is coverage everywhere about all these pacifika players being kept from playing for the islands - everyone forgetting that a huge % were born and/or bred, their rugby skills honed, in NZ (or Oz)
-
@machpants didn't read the posts a bit above this?
-
@duluth said in Pasifika SR team:
Blues are the only NZ franchise without a private license holder, therefore no opposition to NZR. Blues get a team in their backyard.
I did not know that.
My conspiracy theory is completely valid, might as well put a grassy knoll in the middle of Eden Park. -
@mariner4life said in Pasifika SR team:
@machpants didn't read the posts a bit above this?
Yeah, I'm just agreeing
-
@machpants said in Pasifika SR team:
@mariner4life said in Pasifika SR team:
@duluth said in Pasifika SR team:
@snowy said in Pasifika SR team:
So what is the actual goal here? Simply more matches?
The end result could well be - To weaken the comp again? Keep adding teams until the standard is degraded and we, as sports fans, prefer the Bunnings NPC? The blues back to being shit? (Actually I think that is the master plan - but I like conspiracies).
NZR wanted another NZ team. The current SR license holders didn't want that. Blues are the only NZ franchise without a private license holder, therefore no opposition to NZR. Blues get a team in their backyard.
my guess is they saw all those Tongan flags on the first day of the 2011 RWC and their eyes lit up. And if those fans can become engaged then it's not an idea without merit.
Except, unless the rules are actual Island born/bred players, it'll be just another reduction in depth of the other NZ SR sides. And that is what is going to happen, you imagine if NZR was seen to be denying pacifika players the right to play - already there is coverage everywhere about all these pacifika players being kept from playing for the islands - everyone forgetting that a huge % were born and/or bred, their rugby skills honed, in NZ (or Oz)
Yes would have to agree, it would be mainly a NZ domiciled playing base with a few from outside.I can't see how the NZR can put a rule in place to pick only players who are based in the Islands.
-
NEXT STEPS IN PACIFIC ISLAND PROFESSIONAL TEAMS' JOURNEY CONFIRMED BY NZ RUGBY
In a significant step forward for Pacific Island rugby, Moana Pasifika and the Fijian Drua have been granted conditional licences to join a planned new professional competition next year, New Zealand Rugby (NZR) announced today.
The NZR Board’s decision to approve licences is a major step toward the two Pasifika teams joining NZR’s existing five Sky Super Rugby Aotearoa clubs and Rugby Australia’s (RA) five Super Rugby AU teams in a new tournament being planned for 2022 and is conditional on their final business plans and RA's support.NZR CEO Mark Robinson said:
“We are moving into the final phase of planning for 2022 and beyond, and we have confidence that Moana Pasifika and the Fijian Drua will be able to meet the conditions of the licence, which includes final sign off on a sustainable business plan by 30 June.
“In the next two months we will be working with Rugby Australia and the two Pasifika teams to formalise their place in the new competition for what we believe will kick off an exciting, new era for the professional game.”
Moana Pasifika Steering Committee Co-Chair and CEO of the Pacific Business Trust Pelenato Sakalia said:
“We are excited to finally be so close to bringing the dream to reality, but there is still hard work to do, and we cannot afford to miss the moment. This decision on a licence enables Moana Pasifika to proceed with confidence and complete a number of financial obligations to sign off in the coming weeks, and formalise our player, coach and staff recruitment.”
Not any info about where they will be based, where they can recruit their players from etc etc -
From the ESPN article below:
It is yet to be announced where the teams will base their home games, with Sydney Morning Herald reporting Fiji may play out of Sydney, while Pacifika aim to play a handful of their games in New Zealand.
|
The conditional license means Fiji and Pasifika are now all but confirmed additions in the competition and can now formalize their player, coach and staff recruitment. It is another step forward for Pacific Island rugby.Would be great to know what that means: permanent base in Samoa/Tonga, temporary base in NZ?
-
From the article in the Sydney Morning Herald below:
The Pasifika team is expected to be partly based in south Auckland and the Fijians - who were part of the now-defunct NRC - could be partly based in western Sydney.
“That’s one thing that’s been brought up,” Fiji general manager of rugby Simon Raiwalui told the Herald.
“Obviously Fiji is a small market. We would definitely look at playing matches externally. Whether that’s in Australia, New Zealand or whatever other opportunities become available to us.
“With the Fijian and Pasifika communities in both countries and throughout south-east Asia, there are huge communities and huge support for anything Fiji rugby. That’s definitely an opportunity.”
Raiwalui believes the lure of returning home will help bring many Fijian stars now plying their trade abroad back to Fiji in the near future.
“One thing we don’t struggle with is talent. That’s our strongest resource. Obviously, it’s going to come down to timing with contracts and turnover,” he said.
“The first couple of years it’s going to be about building that initial squad. We have obviously talked to a lot of our talent worldwide. Whether that’s Australia, New Zealand or Europe.
“And there is a lot of interest to come back at the first opportunity to come and live in Fiji. To work and live in their home country, with their families and be able to earn a competitive salary
“It’s going to come down to timing but it’s not going to just be a one year project. It’s about planning over the next two, three, four or five years and targeting guys we want to bring back.”Fiji, Pasifika teams to join Super Rugby in ‘new dawn’ for region
The competition will expand to 12 teams next year, and the two new sides will come from the Fiji and Pasifika regions.
-
-
@nzzp said in Pasifika SR team:
Fijian Drua - great stuff. Population base of nearly a million in Fiji, and a stadium to play at.
PI team leaves me a bit cold, though. Could they do a travelling home game - take it out to Whangarei, Tauranga, Naki, etc? Would soak up some fan support
yuck!!! nomad teams never work. Teams need a home.
-
@mariner4life said in Pasifika SR team:
@nzzp said in Pasifika SR team:
Fijian Drua - great stuff. Population base of nearly a million in Fiji, and a stadium to play at.
PI team leaves me a bit cold, though. Could they do a travelling home game - take it out to Whangarei, Tauranga, Naki, etc? Would soak up some fan support
yuck!!! nomad teams never work. Teams need a home.
yeah, I guess. South Auckland as a base though - seriously? Just as the Blues get some people behind them, you split up their feeders and their supporters. Yuck again.
-
I like the Moana Pasifika idea as long as they focus on PI eligible players. I understand that counties are looking at working with them. This would be good for my home province. They don't really get much love from the Chiefs in regard to games. Pukekohe might be their NZ training base and the stadium (Eco-light stadium) or Mt Smart could be where they play.
-
Auckland based 'Moana Pasifika' Super Rugby team bid unveiled - but are Fiji on board?
A new south Auckland based group - Moana Pasifika - have launched a bid to become Super Rugby's much-vaunted new Pacific rugby team.
The group that wants to represent all of the Pacific nations, and are proposing to work closely with Counties-Manukau rugby union, who are based in south Auckland. -
-
@machpants Do you ever read posts on the Fern? This has already been posted.
-
@stargazer said in Pasifika SR team:
@machpants Do you ever read posts on the Fern? This has already been posted.
I blame the iPad it often starts me past my last read post.
My apologies!
-
@mariner4life said in Pasifika SR team:
@crucial said in Pasifika SR team:
@mariner4life said in Pasifika SR team:
conceptually i love this idea. the problem is the reality.
Island teams based out of the islands, playing in the islands, exposing the best local players (including those that have schooled in NZ/Aus) and providing a realistic pathway. Awesome. Who doesn't love it? Imagine popping up to Fiji for the weekend to watch the Chiefs then stay at on at Denarau? Great for the economy. Throw in a couple of teams with a different style to what we usually see, and there is little to quibble at.
Then the reality sets in. Local players using local facilities are going to be a fucking miiiiiiile behind the required standard. And horrendous beatings will be on the cards. So they'll need a few seasoned pros to help them out. Where do they get them from? The obvious hope is Europe. but what are the chances of Charlie Piatau leaving England to go live in Tonga/Samoa for a Super rugby salary? Then what are the chances of a guy from Auckland/Wellington doing the same? Neither are high. So you have to base in Auckland to be attractive. That's half the above advantages gone already. Broadcasters will whinge about the cost of showing games from the Islands, so again, base in Auckland please. You base in Auckland, and suddenly guys already here, and already in a semi-pro environment look so much better. So instead of providing a pathway for the Islands, you are eroding the paper-thin depth of NZ. Or staffing your team with players not good enough for NZ teams, so we are back to the beatings.
It might be better for everyone if the Tonga/Samoa team is based in Aus if it has to be anywhere.
and this is from a guy whose speciality is posting stupid Star Wars memes.
you may have me confused with someone else
You all look alike you people with names starting with M.
I wish I could put today's posting down to being drunk but sadly it was a result of being pissed off and really busy at work so just firing in here to make stupid comments. I know that sounds normal but I think there was maybe an extra 1% stupidity added.
-
Seems to be a lot of negativity and doom and gloom about this announcement.
Does anyone remember the conference system we had only a year or two ago? To me this new competition seems like a massive upgrade on the shit show we had previously.
Let’s wait and see what happens re eligibility, home bases, financials, competitiveness etc etc before we throw the baby out with the bath water.
I’m looking forward to it!
