'Super Rugby' 2021
-
@antipodean who's going to be mid-table and bring in heaps of cash? Maybe if you invite the Japanese national team but otherwise im drawing blanks.
Hell, the Lions were the form South African team over the past five years and lets be honest, they were middling when compared to the NZ sides.
It would be great if you could magic up a highly competitive rugby competition which brought in lots of money and gave your current 5 teams a challenge. It's also a pipe dream.
I think there is plenty of merit to the suggestion that we should not have expanded. But i really don't think you can just 'undo' it and expect to end up where we started.
-
@Derpus said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:
@antipodean who's going to be mid-table and bring in heaps of cash? Maybe if you invite the Japanese national team but otherwise im drawing blanks.
That's why suggested the Brave Blossoms: 'If
Argentinathe Jaguares could play SR, why not the Brave Blossoms?' -
@antipodean and that why i said 'pipe dream'.
-
@Derpus said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:
I think there is plenty of merit to the suggestion that we should not have expanded. But i really don't think you can just 'undo' it and expect to end up where we started.
Why not? You did. Just because you let them into your own Super NRC doesn't mean anyone else is obliged to let them play. If SR started again next year, they'd still be told to fuck off.
-
@Derpus said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:
@antipodean and that why i said 'pipe dream'.
The same pipe dream that had Argentina play SR...
-
@antipodean yeah that went well for them... i can see why teams would be lining up to follow suit.
If your argument is 'you have to cut a team because otherwise we'll get the Brave Blossoms' i think im done here.
-
@Derpus said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:
@antipodean yeah that went well for them... i can see why teams would be lining up to follow suit.
If your argument is 'you have to cut a team because otherwise we'll get the Brave Blossoms' i think im done here.
no, the argument is mainly
you already cut a team, for very good reasons. Why bring it back?
-
@mariner4life Because Twiggy forest is a billionaire and he's chosen to pay for it. We cut it because we couldnt afford it (supposedly). If he is offering to foot the entire bill - why wouldnt we accept it.
But i wouldn't die on a hill for the Force. As you say, they are now separate to RA. The real issue is cutting another team.
-
-
@antipodean said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:
@Derpus said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:
@antipodean and that why i said 'pipe dream'.
The same pipe dream that had Argentina play SR...
The obvious difference being Argentina didn't have a thriving club competition awash with cash.
-
@mariner4life said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:
no, the argument is mainly
you already cut a team, for very good reasons. Why bring it back?
Because it's funded by a guy bringing some spare cash, who is probably worth like 10% of NZ's annual GDP.
-
@Derpus said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:
@antipodean yeah that went well for them... i can see why teams would be lining up to follow suit.
Made last year's final.
If your argument is 'you have to cut a team because otherwise we'll get the Brave Blossoms' i think im done here.
How much easier you must find it to have the argument you wish to have, rather than actually dealing with what the other said.
If SR TT was to have a Japanese side, the precondition would be to not have a SunWolves Mk II scenario, but genuine JRFU support.
-
ah yes, the Great Western Hope, who absolutely does stuff out of the goodness of his heart.
-
@Kiap said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:
@mariner4life said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:
no, the argument is mainly
you already cut a team, for very good reasons. Why bring it back?
Because it's funded by a guy bringing some spare cash, who is probably worth like 10% of NZ's annual GDP.
How long do people think he's going to bankroll this vanity project once he no longer gets the recognition? I genuinely don't understand why people are willing to die on the hill for the Force. Only once in their entire SR participation did they finish with a positive points difference. Their highest table position was seventh. Their squad now is a list of unknowns and retirees.
-
@antipodean said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:
@Kiap said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:
@mariner4life said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:
no, the argument is mainly
you already cut a team, for very good reasons. Why bring it back?
Because it's funded by a guy bringing some spare cash, who is probably worth like 10% of NZ's annual GDP.
How long do people think he's going to bankroll this vanity project once he no longer gets the recognition? I genuinely don't understand why people are willing to die on the hill for the Force. Only once in their entire SR participation did they finish with a positive points difference. Their highest table position was seventh. Their squad now is a list of unknowns and retirees.
now?
-
@barbarian said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:
The obvious difference being Argentina didn't have a thriving club competition awash with cash.
Yeah, I think it's clear enough that Japan are interested in playing SH teams. Just not so much in a TT-style comp when they have their own regular season, but more a post-season Champs competition
-
@mariner4life said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:
ah yes, the Great Western Hope, who absolutely does stuff out of the goodness of his heart.
Lol. I never promised you a rose garden.
Still, short of a big fan ownership component, it's a far better option than the likes of CVC.
-
Where was Twiggy when FirePower wouldn't pay its bills?
-
@Kiap said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:
@mariner4life said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:
ah yes, the Great Western Hope, who absolutely does stuff out of the goodness of his heart.
Lol. I never promised you a rose garden.
Still, short of a big fan ownership component, it's a far better option than the likes of CVC.
private equity makes no sense to me. Of course i am well aware i am probably missing something.
