Cricket: NZ vs Aus
-
FFS, Latham now spoons one to mid on.
That right here is the difference between the 2 sides, they don’t give their wickets away like that, and they don’t lose wickets back to back, especially not both set batsmen.
We’re in a world of hurt all of a sudden.
-
@Siam said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
Laws clearly state, no bandaging or tape on bowling hand. Will the sportsmanship team NZ let him tape it?
I fkn hope not!
We are too generous.
Chance to get him out of the game or at the very least to make him take it off so its harder for him, but no.
-
It shouldn't be up to us. It's either allowed or it's not. Umpires should make the call.
-
@No-Quarter said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
It shouldn't be up to us. It's either allowed or it's not. Umpires should make the call.
No. Not every game of cricket is played with professional umpires. Having a clear ruling on taped up bowling hands is far more effective.
Much more logical to give the receivers of a taped up hand deciding it's use.
Don't likeit? tough, take the bandage off then -
Would have liked Raval and Latham to press on a while longer, do not like when we lose multiple wickets in a short amount of time. Add to that, Phillips was bloody lucky not to be the third. But we got a solid start, at least. I'm liking Blundell in the opener role.
I have very high expectations of NZA. 300 runs on the board at least.
-
@Gunner said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
@Siam said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
Laws clearly state, no bandaging or tape on bowling hand. Will the sportsmanship team NZ let him tape it?
I fkn hope not!
We are too generous.
Chance to get him out of the game or at the very least to make him take it off so its harder for him, but no.
What would Aus do? It's not allowed, so tell him to take it off. It is effectively cheating - again.
-
-
@mariner4life said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
I'm watching Smithy on a pisstake show called The Professors Night Watchman. And he's killing it. Just a genuine, funny bloke.
Saw that too. Best thing that’s happened on this tour...