Cricket: NZ vs Aus
-
@Mokey said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
NZ fans because of booing is comical.
Aussie comms also having a go at Nigel "that could have been anything" Llong over one a run decision about avoidance of a bouncer that was deemed a no run.
Have a look at some test deciding decisions that he has made!
-
Fuuuuucckk why did we bowl???
-
@No-Quarter supposedly the pitch gets better for batting over time, so the best time to bowl is first.
I'd have batted though.
-
Kane butchers a run out. Just had to bounce it to Southee. Pretty disappointing stuff at this level, what a let off.
-
@Godder said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
@No-Quarter supposedly the pitch gets better for batting over time, so the best time to bowl is first.
I'd have batted though.
Yeah, batting last is fraught with danger regardless of the pitch. Just needed to bat first and get 350+ and she's all on.
-
@Snowy said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
That "bat smash" sensor thing, or whatever they are calling it, looks interesting. Bat speed, angle, etc measured from the bat itself. Pretty cool.
Yeah, would have been interesting to see with Baz, his bat speed would be next level for some of his shots.
-
@No-Quarter said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
Kane butchers a run out. Just had to bounce it to Southee. Pretty disappointing stuff at this level, what a let off.
That's so disappointing - a chance to get their form batsman and almost open up an end (in relative terms). One thing I noticed in Perth was that the Aussies seemed to hit the stumps more than us.
-
Southee bowling well an appeal for LBW but it could have come off anything.
-
I like the tactic of keeping it outside off and frustrating Smith. Getting drawn into attacking his stumps just feeds him easy runs.
-
Shane Warne clearly doesn’t know where the shoulder blades are....
-
I lean towards agreeing with the umpire on the denied run. Smith just turned around and it him in the back, that's hardly evasive action. Not exactly controversial and it's one run, get over it.
-
Comms: "... if Santer can just get one to turn and put doubt in the batsmen..."
Yes, if only.