Cricket: NZ vs Aus
-
-
-
wait, does this mean The Park Cricketer is going to take the new nut? In a test?
Fuuuuck
-
@KiwiMurph said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
Oh no - how ever are we going to replace the production that Williamson, Nicholls and Santner have provided this series.....
that's actually a fair point. when we get pumped to the tune of 300 runs again, at least we have excuses this time.
-
-
@Chris-B said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
Oh - and Oz win the toss and will bat....
pfffft, who the fuck bats first in Australia?
-
Bowling first in all three tests. Tough times.
-
@No-Quarter said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
Bowling first in all three tests. Tough times.
yep. wish we had at least won a toss so we got a choice....
-
also, didn't Henry used to be quite sharp? Like, in 2015?
-
@Gunner said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
Wow what a line up.
It’ll be a miracle if we don’t lose by an innings.
Ian Smith or Gary Stead must have been close to strapping on the pads.
I think Peter Fulton would have been more likely, but damn that's an unlikely team. Hope they win, that would be awesome and hilarious.
-
We're paying $14 to win, $5 to draw - if anyone wants a piece of that.
Oz at $1.20 to win is pretty easy money, unless there's a lot of rain coming.
If Timmy is knackered then there's not much point playing him. Matt Henry will need to bowl a lot of overs and there's not that much between Tim and Matt.
-
We really needed about 4 early wickets if we want to keep this within an innings defeat.
-
@Chris-B said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
We're paying $14 to win, $5 to draw - if anyone wants a piece of that.
Oz at $1.20 to win is pretty easy money, unless there's a lot of rain coming.
If Timmy is knackered then there's not much point playing him. Matt Henry will need to bowl a lot of overs and there's not that much between Tim and Matt.
There's a lot of difference in terms of experience and test record. I also just feel sorry for Southee who missed out on captaincy due to Christchurch.
