Southland Rugby
-
as good a chance as they will get this year to break that streak when the face Manawatu.
Not a nice feeling being where they are.
-
@taniwharugby said in Southland Rugby:
as good a chance as they will get this year to break that streak when the face Manawatu.
Not a nice feeling being where they are.
I really hope they do. They are my second team if there is such a thing
-
I think depth in the school grades is part of the issue. Know a few guys from around there as the misses is unfortunately from there.
Looking at their school results seems like SBHS is the only team. I know they have always been head and shoulders above but look at the likes of James Hargest I know a lot of guys who went there over the years who are half decent footy players. Now the school i think had 2 or 3 teams total and their 1st 15 is in 2nd 15 grade.
They have never really supplied Stags that I know of but more the flow on to Southland Secondary Schools sides, development of colts grades and even just building good juniors who might go off to uni but then come back and make prems more competitive over the years.
On all accounts my mates said the Prems comp is shit house. Hard to get guys from club rugby to NPC level when its so crap. We have all seen over the years teams that have been so-so but had enough quality to overperform....the following year they get a bunch of super rugby players who then get to train full time and come back and strengthen the province.
Southland is the opposite they are stuck in the loop of very few Super rugby players who come back into a team full of guys who have been playing a season of shithouse club footy.
Don't know what the solution is. Maybe get the check book out to NZSS kids and get them to SIT for free and build from there.
-
@Magpie_in_aus maybe the solution is to redistribute the teams along populations lines? Should Southland just become a heartland team?
-
@Kirwan said in Southland Rugby:
@Magpie_in_aus maybe the solution is to redistribute the teams along populations lines? Should Southland just become a heartland team?
The criteria being how many people in order to have a Div 1 team? 100,000 would see others such as Ta$man also demoted, and 16 sides from Greater Auckland.
-
@shark the last time they talked about demotiion (Northland, Ta$man, Counties) Southland were all but safe due to some arbitrary criteria....2 of those sides have proven even considering ditching them was wrong, Northland are plodding along, paying thier way...ditching Southland would kill thier schoolboy and club rugby further I expect.
-
@taniwharugby Yup can't be easy for them as you Northland fans would know being in the same situation yourselves. Good luck to them I hope things can change as they had some decent sides going back a decade or so.
-
@shark said in Southland Rugby:
@Kirwan said in Southland Rugby:
@Magpie_in_aus maybe the solution is to redistribute the teams along populations lines? Should Southland just become a heartland team?
The criteria being how many people in order to have a Div 1 team? 100,000 would see others such as Ta$man also demoted, and 16 sides from Greater Auckland.
Population would be one factor. Local club numbers, functioning pathways through the various levels, facilities, budgets, sponsorship would some others.
Personally, I’d prefer survival of the fittest. Bring back relegation and if you wanted a new team it has to play it’s way up like North Harbour did.
In that scenario, if Southland can’t stay up then so be it. Go back through history and previously strong team aren’t any more.
The rep system has to factor in changes in the community around teams.
-
@shark said in Southland Rugby:
@Kirwan said in Southland Rugby:
@Magpie_in_aus maybe the solution is to redistribute the teams along populations lines? Should Southland just become a heartland team?
The criteria being how many people in order to have a Div 1 team? 100,000 would see others such as Ta$man also demoted, and 16 sides from Greater Auckland.
Ta$man's catchment - i.e. Nelson City, Marlborough, Ta$man District has a population of 150,000.
