New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2
-
-
@KiwiPie said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:
@Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:
Must be Boult at 11. Latham at 5?
Latham is a tick at 5. Not Boult for 11, he's been out a few times.
Ooooh, what about Mitch McLenaghan? He's turned himself into a handy pinch hitter but I think he started out batting 11.
-
@Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:
Ronchi at 8 maybe? Can't remember where he batted most (probably 7 though), but for a while we would have had Elliott and Anderson ahead of him.
Fern favourite Luke Ronchi, one massive score and fuck all else.....
Cracked me up once when he came in and the commentators said something like "he'll want to get a decent score, he's been a bit out of form of late...."
"of late" pretty much being his whole fucken career.
-
@Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:
@KiwiPie said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:
@Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:
Must be Boult at 11. Latham at 5?
Latham is a tick at 5. Not Boult for 11, he's been out a few times.
Ooooh, what about Mitch McLenaghan? He's turned himself into a handy pinch hitter but I think he started out batting 11.
Yes! An average of 55 batting at number 11 ....
- Turner
- Guptill
- Williamson
- Taylor
- Latham
- Harris
- McClenaghan
-
@MN5 said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:
@Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:
Ronchi at 8 maybe? Can't remember where he batted most (probably 7 though), but for a while we would have had Elliott and Anderson ahead of him.
Fern favourite Luke Ronchi, one massive score and fuck all else.....
Cracked me up once when he came in and the commentators said something like "he'll want to get a decent score, he's been a bit out of form of late...."
"of late" pretty much being his whole fucken career.
What he said, it isn't Ronchi.
-
@KiwiPie said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:
@Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:
@KiwiPie said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:
@Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:
Must be Boult at 11. Latham at 5?
Latham is a tick at 5. Not Boult for 11, he's been out a few times.
Ooooh, what about Mitch McLenaghan? He's turned himself into a handy pinch hitter but I think he started out batting 11.
Yes! An average of 55 batting at number 11 ....
- Turner
- Guptill
- Williamson
- Taylor
- Latham
- Harris
- McClenaghan
Ha! Is that the highest average in the 11?
-
@Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:
@KiwiPie said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:
@Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:
@KiwiPie said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:
@Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:
Must be Boult at 11. Latham at 5?
Latham is a tick at 5. Not Boult for 11, he's been out a few times.
Ooooh, what about Mitch McLenaghan? He's turned himself into a handy pinch hitter but I think he started out batting 11.
Yes! An average of 55 batting at number 11 ....
- Turner
- Guptill
- Williamson
- Taylor
- Latham
- Harris
- McClenaghan
Ha! Is that the highest average in the 11?
It is - just ahead of Taylor who has a phenomenal average of 52.65 batting at 4 (definition of phenomenal in this case is being ahead of Martin Crowe)
-
@KiwiPie said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:
@MN5 said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:
@Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:
Ronchi at 8 maybe? Can't remember where he batted most (probably 7 though), but for a while we would have had Elliott and Anderson ahead of him.
Fern favourite Luke Ronchi, one massive score and fuck all else.....
Cracked me up once when he came in and the commentators said something like "he'll want to get a decent score, he's been a bit out of form of late...."
"of late" pretty much being his whole fucken career.
What he said, it isn't Ronchi.
I think anyone googling "Luke" and "Ronchi" would figure that out but thanks for the clarification
-
-
@Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:
I was sure someone had said Nicholls at 6 but can't find it now. He's got a decent number of not outs there too.
Kyle Mills for the 10 and maybe Baz at 9?
All negative - not sure Nicholls has enough games at 6, Mills is 3rd at 10 (and also at 9) and I don't think Baz was ever that low was he?
-
@KiwiPie said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:
@Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:
I was sure someone had said Nicholls at 6 but can't find it now. He's got a decent number of not outs there too.
Kyle Mills for the 10 and maybe Baz at 9?
All negative - not sure Nicholls has enough games at 6, Mills is 3rd at 10 (and also at 9) and I don't think Baz was ever that low was he?
Hadn't picked up that the qualifier had gone up to 20.
Neesham at 6?
-
@Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:
@KiwiPie said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:
@Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:
I was sure someone had said Nicholls at 6 but can't find it now. He's got a decent number of not outs there too.
Kyle Mills for the 10 and maybe Baz at 9?
All negative - not sure Nicholls has enough games at 6, Mills is 3rd at 10 (and also at 9) and I don't think Baz was ever that low was he?
Hadn't picked up that the qualifier had gone up to 20.
Neesham at 6?
Another one taken - just 9 and 10 to be guessed. 9 is a left-handed bat, 10 is a right-handed bat. Both have opened the bowling at test level for NZ.
-
