New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2

[MN5]

@KiwiPie said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

Get back to the ODI team - you still need

5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11

All of them played in ODIs in this century.

Oram fell down the batting order late in his career, I nominate him.

[Chris B.]

If someone is appearing twice it's a reasonable bet it's in that No. 5 slot - so, Rossco there as well.....or Little Kane.

[KiwiPie]

@MN5 said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

@KiwiPie said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

Get back to the ODI team - you still need

5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11

All of them played in ODIs in this century.

Oram fell down the batting order late in his career, I nominate him.

No Oram fell into the close but no cigar category

[KiwiPie]

@Chris-B said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

If someone is appearing twice it's a reasonable bet it's in that No. 5 slot - so, Rossco there as well.....or Little Kane.

No not those 2. But it narrows it down somewhat.

[Rapido]

Adam Milne basically never gets dismissed. Is he 10 or 11?

[KiwiPie]

@Rapido said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

Adam Milne basically never gets dismissed. Is he 10 or 11?

No

[Cyclops]

Ronchi at 8 maybe? Can't remember where he batted most (probably 7 though), but for a while we would have had Elliott and Anderson ahead of him.

[KiwiPie]

More clues

5, 6 and 11 have played recently and may or may not be in the current ODI squad. 8, 9, 10 are no longer available for selection. 8 and 9 have all batted higher in the order so these positions would be their lowest.

[Cyclops]

Must be Boult at 11. Latham at 5?

[KiwiPie]

@Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

Must be Boult at 11. Latham at 5?

Latham is a tick at 5. Not Boult for 11, he's been out a few times.

[Cyclops]

@KiwiPie said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

@Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

Must be Boult at 11. Latham at 5?

Latham is a tick at 5. Not Boult for 11, he's been out a few times.

Ooooh, what about Mitch McLenaghan? He's turned himself into a handy pinch hitter but I think he started out batting 11.

[MN5]

@Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

Ronchi at 8 maybe? Can't remember where he batted most (probably 7 though), but for a while we would have had Elliott and Anderson ahead of him.

Fern favourite Luke Ronchi, one massive score and fuck all else.....

Cracked me up once when he came in and the commentators said something like "he'll want to get a decent score, he's been a bit out of form of late...."

"of late" pretty much being his whole fucken career.

[KiwiPie]

@Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

@KiwiPie said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

@Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

Must be Boult at 11. Latham at 5?

Latham is a tick at 5. Not Boult for 11, he's been out a few times.

Ooooh, what about Mitch McLenaghan? He's turned himself into a handy pinch hitter but I think he started out batting 11.

Yes! An average of 55 batting at number 11 ....

1. Turner
2. Guptill
3. Williamson
4. Taylor
5. Latham
7. Harris
11. McClenaghan

[KiwiPie]

@MN5 said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

@Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

Ronchi at 8 maybe? Can't remember where he batted most (probably 7 though), but for a while we would have had Elliott and Anderson ahead of him.

Fern favourite Luke Ronchi, one massive score and fuck all else.....

Cracked me up once when he came in and the commentators said something like "he'll want to get a decent score, he's been a bit out of form of late...."

"of late" pretty much being his whole fucken career.

What he said, it isn't Ronchi.

[Cyclops]

@KiwiPie said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

@Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

@KiwiPie said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

@Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

Must be Boult at 11. Latham at 5?

Latham is a tick at 5. Not Boult for 11, he's been out a few times.

Ooooh, what about Mitch McLenaghan? He's turned himself into a handy pinch hitter but I think he started out batting 11.

Yes! An average of 55 batting at number 11 ....

1. Turner
2. Guptill
3. Williamson
4. Taylor
5. Latham
7. Harris
11. McClenaghan

Ha! Is that the highest average in the 11?

[KiwiPie]

@Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

@KiwiPie said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

@Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

@KiwiPie said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

@Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

Must be Boult at 11. Latham at 5?

Latham is a tick at 5. Not Boult for 11, he's been out a few times.

Ooooh, what about Mitch McLenaghan? He's turned himself into a handy pinch hitter but I think he started out batting 11.

Yes! An average of 55 batting at number 11 ....

1. Turner
2. Guptill
3. Williamson
4. Taylor
5. Latham
7. Harris
11. McClenaghan

Ha! Is that the highest average in the 11?

It is - just ahead of Taylor who has a phenomenal average of 52.65 batting at 4 (definition of phenomenal in this case is being ahead of Martin Crowe)

[MN5]

@KiwiPie said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

@MN5 said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

@Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

Ronchi at 8 maybe? Can't remember where he batted most (probably 7 though), but for a while we would have had Elliott and Anderson ahead of him.

Fern favourite Luke Ronchi, one massive score and fuck all else.....

Cracked me up once when he came in and the commentators said something like "he'll want to get a decent score, he's been a bit out of form of late...."

"of late" pretty much being his whole fucken career.

What he said, it isn't Ronchi.

I think anyone googling "Luke" and "Ronchi" would figure that out but thanks for the clarification

[Chris B.]

Is it Harry also at 8?

[dogmeat]

Cairns at 8
Vettori at 10?

[KiwiPie]

@Chris-B said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

Is it Harry also at 8?

Yes it is.

6, 9 and 10 left.

6 is a recent success, 9 usually batted higher and 10 is a tail ender who could wield a willow.