• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

The Ashes

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
662 Posts 46 Posters 72.3k Views
The Ashes
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #156

    England are insipid.

    5 - 0.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #157

    Trash. 143/7 in Adelaide? fucking hopeless. This should be all over by tomorrow.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #158

    Go the pink ball at night!

    3 down.

    Healy gutted at that last wicket 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #159

    41 for 3

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #160

    Eeeeedge ... drops in front offirst slip

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #161

    Out!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #162

    Smith reviewing. Only if he hits it.

    Out
    Out
    Out

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #163

    Oooh barely pitching outside leg... deserved to be out

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Do not disturb
    ACT CrusaderA Do not disturb
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #164

    That was a pearler by Anderson and so so close. The ball two deliveries later was a great one to that had Smith in no mans land.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #165

    Out again?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #166

    High?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #167

    Close

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #168

    Umpires call.

    Fuck off!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #169

    Smithy out. 50 for 4.

    Pink ball at night doing it's thing and changing it all it up.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #170

    Lyon? Night watchman

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #171

    So... anyone think the bullshit about not enforcing the follow on is just crap?

    So VVS made mincemeat of you 20 years ago ... in India... on a road ...

    ... and you're rested ... on a cool evening ... with a pink ball at night ....

    Dumb.

    As dumb Joe Root electing to bowl.

    DonsteppaD 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • pukunuiP Offline
    pukunuiP Offline
    pukunui
    wrote on last edited by
    #172

    Can someone clarify for me? Why was the first Smith LBW not an umpires call with the pitch of the ball given part of the ball was in line with leg?
    Are there different rules for that because it isn't a prediction of the balls path rather a record of it's actual pitch?

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to pukunui on last edited by
    #173

    @pukunui said in The Ashes:

    Can someone clarify for me? Why was the first Smith LBW not an umpires call with the pitch of the ball given part of the ball was in line with leg?
    Are there different rules for that because it isn't a prediction of the balls path rather a record of it's actual pitch?

    I think it's the proportion of the ball that is judged to be in line with whatever.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to booboo on last edited by Donsteppa
    #174

    @booboo said in The Ashes:

    So... anyone think the bullshit about not enforcing the follow on is just crap?

    So VVS made mincemeat of you 20 years ago ... in India... on a road ...

    ... and you're rested ... on a cool evening ... with a pink ball at night ....

    Dumb.

    As dumb Joe Root electing to bowl.

    Ha! Was just logging in to post that. Was surprised when Oz didn’t enforce the follow on under lights, and unsurprised to wake up to 53/4.

    Maybe one day Oz will get over 2001...

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    wrote on last edited by
    #175

    The non enforcement of the follow on isn't dumb because the Aussies already have enough runs to win.
    Another 50 from here makes the game safe.

    Best 4th innings there is 233 in 2003 pre ground development.

    At this stage oz are miles in front of the test. The follow on thing ain't that relevant in my opinion

    1 Reply Last reply
    2

The Ashes
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.